Cargando…

Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relative performance of hip prosthesis constructs as compared with the best performing prosthesis constructs and illustrate the substantial variability in performance of currently used prostheses. DESIGN: A non-inferiority study. SETTING: The National Joint Registry fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deere, Kevin C, Whitehouse, Michael R, Porter, Martyn, Blom, Ashley W, Sayers, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31036708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026685
_version_ 1783416185000296448
author Deere, Kevin C
Whitehouse, Michael R
Porter, Martyn
Blom, Ashley W
Sayers, Adrian
author_facet Deere, Kevin C
Whitehouse, Michael R
Porter, Martyn
Blom, Ashley W
Sayers, Adrian
author_sort Deere, Kevin C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relative performance of hip prosthesis constructs as compared with the best performing prosthesis constructs and illustrate the substantial variability in performance of currently used prostheses. DESIGN: A non-inferiority study. SETTING: The National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR). PARTICIPANTS: All patients with a primary total hip replacement registered in the NJR between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier failure function for hip prosthesis constructs. Failure difference between best performing construct and remaining constructs. METHODS: Using a non-inferiority analysis, the performance of hip prosthesis constructs by brand were compared with the best performing contemporary construct. Construct failure was estimated using the 1-Kaplan-Meier survival function method, that is, an estimate of net failure. The difference in failure between the contemporary benchmark and all other constructs was tested. RESULTS: Of the 4442 constructs used, only 134 had ≥500 procedures at risk at 3 years postprimary, 89 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior to the benchmark by at least 100% relative risk. By 10 years postprimary, there were 26 constructs with ≥500 at risk, 13 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior by at least 20% relative risk. Even fewer constructs were not inferior to the benchmark when analysed by age and gender. At 5 years postprimary, there were 15 constructs in males and 11 in females, aged 55–75 years, not shown to be inferior. CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability in construct performance and the majority of constructs have not been demonstrated to be non-inferior to contemporary benchmarks. These results can help to inform patients, clinicians and commissioners when considering hip replacement surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6502009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65020092019-05-21 Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study Deere, Kevin C Whitehouse, Michael R Porter, Martyn Blom, Ashley W Sayers, Adrian BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relative performance of hip prosthesis constructs as compared with the best performing prosthesis constructs and illustrate the substantial variability in performance of currently used prostheses. DESIGN: A non-inferiority study. SETTING: The National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR). PARTICIPANTS: All patients with a primary total hip replacement registered in the NJR between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier failure function for hip prosthesis constructs. Failure difference between best performing construct and remaining constructs. METHODS: Using a non-inferiority analysis, the performance of hip prosthesis constructs by brand were compared with the best performing contemporary construct. Construct failure was estimated using the 1-Kaplan-Meier survival function method, that is, an estimate of net failure. The difference in failure between the contemporary benchmark and all other constructs was tested. RESULTS: Of the 4442 constructs used, only 134 had ≥500 procedures at risk at 3 years postprimary, 89 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior to the benchmark by at least 100% relative risk. By 10 years postprimary, there were 26 constructs with ≥500 at risk, 13 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior by at least 20% relative risk. Even fewer constructs were not inferior to the benchmark when analysed by age and gender. At 5 years postprimary, there were 15 constructs in males and 11 in females, aged 55–75 years, not shown to be inferior. CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability in construct performance and the majority of constructs have not been demonstrated to be non-inferior to contemporary benchmarks. These results can help to inform patients, clinicians and commissioners when considering hip replacement surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6502009/ /pubmed/31036708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026685 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Deere, Kevin C
Whitehouse, Michael R
Porter, Martyn
Blom, Ashley W
Sayers, Adrian
Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study
title Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study
title_full Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study
title_fullStr Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study
title_short Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study
title_sort assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the national joint registry of england, wales, northern ireland and the isle of man: a benchmarking study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31036708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026685
work_keys_str_mv AT deerekevinc assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy
AT whitehousemichaelr assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy
AT portermartyn assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy
AT blomashleyw assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy
AT sayersadrian assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy