Cargando…
Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relative performance of hip prosthesis constructs as compared with the best performing prosthesis constructs and illustrate the substantial variability in performance of currently used prostheses. DESIGN: A non-inferiority study. SETTING: The National Joint Registry fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31036708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026685 |
_version_ | 1783416185000296448 |
---|---|
author | Deere, Kevin C Whitehouse, Michael R Porter, Martyn Blom, Ashley W Sayers, Adrian |
author_facet | Deere, Kevin C Whitehouse, Michael R Porter, Martyn Blom, Ashley W Sayers, Adrian |
author_sort | Deere, Kevin C |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relative performance of hip prosthesis constructs as compared with the best performing prosthesis constructs and illustrate the substantial variability in performance of currently used prostheses. DESIGN: A non-inferiority study. SETTING: The National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR). PARTICIPANTS: All patients with a primary total hip replacement registered in the NJR between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier failure function for hip prosthesis constructs. Failure difference between best performing construct and remaining constructs. METHODS: Using a non-inferiority analysis, the performance of hip prosthesis constructs by brand were compared with the best performing contemporary construct. Construct failure was estimated using the 1-Kaplan-Meier survival function method, that is, an estimate of net failure. The difference in failure between the contemporary benchmark and all other constructs was tested. RESULTS: Of the 4442 constructs used, only 134 had ≥500 procedures at risk at 3 years postprimary, 89 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior to the benchmark by at least 100% relative risk. By 10 years postprimary, there were 26 constructs with ≥500 at risk, 13 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior by at least 20% relative risk. Even fewer constructs were not inferior to the benchmark when analysed by age and gender. At 5 years postprimary, there were 15 constructs in males and 11 in females, aged 55–75 years, not shown to be inferior. CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability in construct performance and the majority of constructs have not been demonstrated to be non-inferior to contemporary benchmarks. These results can help to inform patients, clinicians and commissioners when considering hip replacement surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6502009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65020092019-05-21 Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study Deere, Kevin C Whitehouse, Michael R Porter, Martyn Blom, Ashley W Sayers, Adrian BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relative performance of hip prosthesis constructs as compared with the best performing prosthesis constructs and illustrate the substantial variability in performance of currently used prostheses. DESIGN: A non-inferiority study. SETTING: The National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR). PARTICIPANTS: All patients with a primary total hip replacement registered in the NJR between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier failure function for hip prosthesis constructs. Failure difference between best performing construct and remaining constructs. METHODS: Using a non-inferiority analysis, the performance of hip prosthesis constructs by brand were compared with the best performing contemporary construct. Construct failure was estimated using the 1-Kaplan-Meier survival function method, that is, an estimate of net failure. The difference in failure between the contemporary benchmark and all other constructs was tested. RESULTS: Of the 4442 constructs used, only 134 had ≥500 procedures at risk at 3 years postprimary, 89 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior to the benchmark by at least 100% relative risk. By 10 years postprimary, there were 26 constructs with ≥500 at risk, 13 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior by at least 20% relative risk. Even fewer constructs were not inferior to the benchmark when analysed by age and gender. At 5 years postprimary, there were 15 constructs in males and 11 in females, aged 55–75 years, not shown to be inferior. CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability in construct performance and the majority of constructs have not been demonstrated to be non-inferior to contemporary benchmarks. These results can help to inform patients, clinicians and commissioners when considering hip replacement surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6502009/ /pubmed/31036708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026685 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Deere, Kevin C Whitehouse, Michael R Porter, Martyn Blom, Ashley W Sayers, Adrian Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study |
title | Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study |
title_full | Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study |
title_fullStr | Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study |
title_short | Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: a benchmarking study |
title_sort | assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the national joint registry of england, wales, northern ireland and the isle of man: a benchmarking study |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31036708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deerekevinc assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy AT whitehousemichaelr assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy AT portermartyn assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy AT blomashleyw assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy AT sayersadrian assessingthenoninferiorityofprosthesisconstructsusedinhipreplacementusingdatafromthenationaljointregistryofenglandwalesnorthernirelandandtheisleofmanabenchmarkingstudy |