Cargando…
Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Prostatectomy is the most common treatment. Morbidity from prostatectomy is high—80% of men experience urinary incontinence which negatively impacts the quality of life. Postsurgical pelvic floor muscle training is commonly prescribed b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028288 |
_version_ | 1783416192278462464 |
---|---|
author | Hodges, Paul Stafford, Ryan Coughlin, Geoff D Kasza, Jessica Ashton-Miller, James Cameron, Anne P Connelly, Luke Hall, Leanne M |
author_facet | Hodges, Paul Stafford, Ryan Coughlin, Geoff D Kasza, Jessica Ashton-Miller, James Cameron, Anne P Connelly, Luke Hall, Leanne M |
author_sort | Hodges, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Prostatectomy is the most common treatment. Morbidity from prostatectomy is high—80% of men experience urinary incontinence which negatively impacts the quality of life. Postsurgical pelvic floor muscle training is commonly prescribed but recent systematic reviews found no evidence of efficacy. We propose a new treatment that commences preoperatively and targets functional training of specific pelvic floor muscles that contribute to urinary continence. Assessment and biofeedback using transperineal ultrasound imaging assists in training. This will be compared against conventional training (maximal pelvic floor muscle contraction assessed by digital rectal examination) and no training. Embedded physiological studies will allow the investigation of moderation and mediation of the treatment effect on the outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised clinical trial will include 363 men scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Participants will be randomised into urethral training, conventional training and no training groups. Clinical data will be collected at baseline (1–2 weeks presurgery) and postsurgery after catheter removal, weekly to 3 months (primary endpoint) and monthly to 12 months. Outcomes include 24-hour pad weight test (primary), incontinence, quality of life and cost-effectiveness data. Neuromuscular control measures of pelvic floor muscles will be measured at baseline, postsurgery, 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months. Study assessors and statisticians will be blinded to the group allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry and has ethical approval from the university and host hospital ethics committees. Trial outcomes will be shared via national/international conference presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000788370; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6502040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65020402019-05-21 Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial Hodges, Paul Stafford, Ryan Coughlin, Geoff D Kasza, Jessica Ashton-Miller, James Cameron, Anne P Connelly, Luke Hall, Leanne M BMJ Open Urology INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Prostatectomy is the most common treatment. Morbidity from prostatectomy is high—80% of men experience urinary incontinence which negatively impacts the quality of life. Postsurgical pelvic floor muscle training is commonly prescribed but recent systematic reviews found no evidence of efficacy. We propose a new treatment that commences preoperatively and targets functional training of specific pelvic floor muscles that contribute to urinary continence. Assessment and biofeedback using transperineal ultrasound imaging assists in training. This will be compared against conventional training (maximal pelvic floor muscle contraction assessed by digital rectal examination) and no training. Embedded physiological studies will allow the investigation of moderation and mediation of the treatment effect on the outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised clinical trial will include 363 men scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Participants will be randomised into urethral training, conventional training and no training groups. Clinical data will be collected at baseline (1–2 weeks presurgery) and postsurgery after catheter removal, weekly to 3 months (primary endpoint) and monthly to 12 months. Outcomes include 24-hour pad weight test (primary), incontinence, quality of life and cost-effectiveness data. Neuromuscular control measures of pelvic floor muscles will be measured at baseline, postsurgery, 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months. Study assessors and statisticians will be blinded to the group allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry and has ethical approval from the university and host hospital ethics committees. Trial outcomes will be shared via national/international conference presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000788370; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6502040/ /pubmed/31061057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028288 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Urology Hodges, Paul Stafford, Ryan Coughlin, Geoff D Kasza, Jessica Ashton-Miller, James Cameron, Anne P Connelly, Luke Hall, Leanne M Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (matchup): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hodgespaul efficacyofapersonalisedpelvicfloormuscletrainingprogrammeonurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomymatchupprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT staffordryan efficacyofapersonalisedpelvicfloormuscletrainingprogrammeonurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomymatchupprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT coughlingeoffd efficacyofapersonalisedpelvicfloormuscletrainingprogrammeonurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomymatchupprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kaszajessica efficacyofapersonalisedpelvicfloormuscletrainingprogrammeonurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomymatchupprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ashtonmillerjames efficacyofapersonalisedpelvicfloormuscletrainingprogrammeonurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomymatchupprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cameronannep efficacyofapersonalisedpelvicfloormuscletrainingprogrammeonurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomymatchupprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT connellyluke efficacyofapersonalisedpelvicfloormuscletrainingprogrammeonurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomymatchupprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hallleannem efficacyofapersonalisedpelvicfloormuscletrainingprogrammeonurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomymatchupprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |