Cargando…
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting
INTRODUCTION: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a serious neurological condition most commonly due to compression of the lumbosacral nerve roots, which can result in significant disability. The evidence for acute intervention in CES is mainly from retrospective studies. There is heterogeneity in the ou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024002 |
_version_ | 1783416195562602496 |
---|---|
author | Srikandarajah, Nisaharan Noble, Adam J Wilby, Martin Clark, Simon Williamson, Paula R Marson, Anthony Guy |
author_facet | Srikandarajah, Nisaharan Noble, Adam J Wilby, Martin Clark, Simon Williamson, Paula R Marson, Anthony Guy |
author_sort | Srikandarajah, Nisaharan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a serious neurological condition most commonly due to compression of the lumbosacral nerve roots, which can result in significant disability. The evidence for acute intervention in CES is mainly from retrospective studies. There is heterogeneity in the outcomes chosen for analysis in these studies, which makes it difficult to synthesise the data across studies. This study will develop a core outcome set for use in future studies of CES, engaging with key stakeholders and using transparent methodology. This will help ensure that relevant outcomes are used in future and will facilitate attempts to summarise data across studies in systematic reviews. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic literature review will document all the outcomes for CES after surgery mentioned in the literature. The qualitative interviews with patients with CES will be semistructured, audio recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed with the use of NVivo V.10 to identify outcomes and determine the themes described. The outcomes from the literature review and patient interviews will be combined and prioritised to determine what the most important outcomes are in CES research studies to patients and healthcare professionals. The prioritisation will be done through a two-round iterative Delphi survey and a consensus meeting. This process will decide the core outcome set for patients with CES. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: REC and HRA approval was obtained on the 6/12/16 for the qualitative interviews from South Central—Hampshire A REC. REC reference 16/SC/0587. REC and HRA approval was obtained on 26/3/18 for the Delphi process and consensus meeting from North West—Greater Manchester Central REC. REC reference was 18/NW/0022. The final core outcome set will be published and freely available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials database as study 824. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6502054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65020542019-05-21 Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting Srikandarajah, Nisaharan Noble, Adam J Wilby, Martin Clark, Simon Williamson, Paula R Marson, Anthony Guy BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a serious neurological condition most commonly due to compression of the lumbosacral nerve roots, which can result in significant disability. The evidence for acute intervention in CES is mainly from retrospective studies. There is heterogeneity in the outcomes chosen for analysis in these studies, which makes it difficult to synthesise the data across studies. This study will develop a core outcome set for use in future studies of CES, engaging with key stakeholders and using transparent methodology. This will help ensure that relevant outcomes are used in future and will facilitate attempts to summarise data across studies in systematic reviews. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic literature review will document all the outcomes for CES after surgery mentioned in the literature. The qualitative interviews with patients with CES will be semistructured, audio recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed with the use of NVivo V.10 to identify outcomes and determine the themes described. The outcomes from the literature review and patient interviews will be combined and prioritised to determine what the most important outcomes are in CES research studies to patients and healthcare professionals. The prioritisation will be done through a two-round iterative Delphi survey and a consensus meeting. This process will decide the core outcome set for patients with CES. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: REC and HRA approval was obtained on the 6/12/16 for the qualitative interviews from South Central—Hampshire A REC. REC reference 16/SC/0587. REC and HRA approval was obtained on 26/3/18 for the Delphi process and consensus meeting from North West—Greater Manchester Central REC. REC reference was 18/NW/0022. The final core outcome set will be published and freely available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials database as study 824. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6502054/ /pubmed/31048424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024002 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Srikandarajah, Nisaharan Noble, Adam J Wilby, Martin Clark, Simon Williamson, Paula R Marson, Anthony Guy Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting |
title | Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting |
title_full | Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting |
title_fullStr | Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting |
title_short | Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting |
title_sort | protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, delphi survey and consensus meeting |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31048424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT srikandarajahnisaharan protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomesetforcaudaequinasyndromesystematicliteraturereviewqualitativeinterviewsdelphisurveyandconsensusmeeting AT nobleadamj protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomesetforcaudaequinasyndromesystematicliteraturereviewqualitativeinterviewsdelphisurveyandconsensusmeeting AT wilbymartin protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomesetforcaudaequinasyndromesystematicliteraturereviewqualitativeinterviewsdelphisurveyandconsensusmeeting AT clarksimon protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomesetforcaudaequinasyndromesystematicliteraturereviewqualitativeinterviewsdelphisurveyandconsensusmeeting AT williamsonpaular protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomesetforcaudaequinasyndromesystematicliteraturereviewqualitativeinterviewsdelphisurveyandconsensusmeeting AT marsonanthonyguy protocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomesetforcaudaequinasyndromesystematicliteraturereviewqualitativeinterviewsdelphisurveyandconsensusmeeting |