Cargando…
Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method
Reading is a crucial visual activity and a fundamental skill in daily life. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) is a text-presentation paradigm that has been extensively used in the laboratory to study basic characteristics of reading performance. However, measuring reading function (reading spe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31058991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/19.5.5 |
_version_ | 1783416199074283520 |
---|---|
author | Shepard, Timothy G. Hou, Fang Bex, Peter J. Lesmes, Luis A. Lu, Zhong-Lin Yu, Deyue |
author_facet | Shepard, Timothy G. Hou, Fang Bex, Peter J. Lesmes, Luis A. Lu, Zhong-Lin Yu, Deyue |
author_sort | Shepard, Timothy G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reading is a crucial visual activity and a fundamental skill in daily life. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) is a text-presentation paradigm that has been extensively used in the laboratory to study basic characteristics of reading performance. However, measuring reading function (reading speed vs. print size) is time-consuming for RSVP reading using conventional testing procedures. In this study, we develop a novel method, qReading, utilizing the Bayesian adaptive testing framework to measure reading function in the periphery. We perform both a psychophysical experiment and computer simulations to validate the qReading method. In the experiment, words are presented using an RSVP paradigm at 10° in the lower visual field. The reading function obtained from the qReading method with 50 trials exhibits good agreement (i.e., high accuracy) with the reading function obtained from a conventional method (method of constant stimuli [MCS]) with 186 trials (mean root mean square error: 0.12 log10 units). Simulations further confirm that the qReading method provides an unbiased measure. The qReading procedure also demonstrates excellent precision (half width of 68.2% credible interval: 0.02 log10 units with 50 trials) compared to the MCS method (0.03 log10 units with 186 trials). This investigation establishes that the qReading method can adequately measure the reading function in the normal periphery with high accuracy, precision, and efficiency, and is a potentially valuable tool for both research and clinical assessments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6502069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65020692019-05-20 Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method Shepard, Timothy G. Hou, Fang Bex, Peter J. Lesmes, Luis A. Lu, Zhong-Lin Yu, Deyue J Vis Article Reading is a crucial visual activity and a fundamental skill in daily life. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) is a text-presentation paradigm that has been extensively used in the laboratory to study basic characteristics of reading performance. However, measuring reading function (reading speed vs. print size) is time-consuming for RSVP reading using conventional testing procedures. In this study, we develop a novel method, qReading, utilizing the Bayesian adaptive testing framework to measure reading function in the periphery. We perform both a psychophysical experiment and computer simulations to validate the qReading method. In the experiment, words are presented using an RSVP paradigm at 10° in the lower visual field. The reading function obtained from the qReading method with 50 trials exhibits good agreement (i.e., high accuracy) with the reading function obtained from a conventional method (method of constant stimuli [MCS]) with 186 trials (mean root mean square error: 0.12 log10 units). Simulations further confirm that the qReading method provides an unbiased measure. The qReading procedure also demonstrates excellent precision (half width of 68.2% credible interval: 0.02 log10 units with 50 trials) compared to the MCS method (0.03 log10 units with 186 trials). This investigation establishes that the qReading method can adequately measure the reading function in the normal periphery with high accuracy, precision, and efficiency, and is a potentially valuable tool for both research and clinical assessments. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6502069/ /pubmed/31058991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/19.5.5 Text en Copyright 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Shepard, Timothy G. Hou, Fang Bex, Peter J. Lesmes, Luis A. Lu, Zhong-Lin Yu, Deyue Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method |
title | Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method |
title_full | Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method |
title_fullStr | Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method |
title_short | Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method |
title_sort | assessing reading performance in the periphery with a bayesian adaptive approach: the qreading method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31058991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/19.5.5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shepardtimothyg assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod AT houfang assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod AT bexpeterj assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod AT lesmesluisa assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod AT luzhonglin assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod AT yudeyue assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod |