Cargando…

Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method

Reading is a crucial visual activity and a fundamental skill in daily life. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) is a text-presentation paradigm that has been extensively used in the laboratory to study basic characteristics of reading performance. However, measuring reading function (reading spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shepard, Timothy G., Hou, Fang, Bex, Peter J., Lesmes, Luis A., Lu, Zhong-Lin, Yu, Deyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31058991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/19.5.5
_version_ 1783416199074283520
author Shepard, Timothy G.
Hou, Fang
Bex, Peter J.
Lesmes, Luis A.
Lu, Zhong-Lin
Yu, Deyue
author_facet Shepard, Timothy G.
Hou, Fang
Bex, Peter J.
Lesmes, Luis A.
Lu, Zhong-Lin
Yu, Deyue
author_sort Shepard, Timothy G.
collection PubMed
description Reading is a crucial visual activity and a fundamental skill in daily life. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) is a text-presentation paradigm that has been extensively used in the laboratory to study basic characteristics of reading performance. However, measuring reading function (reading speed vs. print size) is time-consuming for RSVP reading using conventional testing procedures. In this study, we develop a novel method, qReading, utilizing the Bayesian adaptive testing framework to measure reading function in the periphery. We perform both a psychophysical experiment and computer simulations to validate the qReading method. In the experiment, words are presented using an RSVP paradigm at 10° in the lower visual field. The reading function obtained from the qReading method with 50 trials exhibits good agreement (i.e., high accuracy) with the reading function obtained from a conventional method (method of constant stimuli [MCS]) with 186 trials (mean root mean square error: 0.12 log10 units). Simulations further confirm that the qReading method provides an unbiased measure. The qReading procedure also demonstrates excellent precision (half width of 68.2% credible interval: 0.02 log10 units with 50 trials) compared to the MCS method (0.03 log10 units with 186 trials). This investigation establishes that the qReading method can adequately measure the reading function in the normal periphery with high accuracy, precision, and efficiency, and is a potentially valuable tool for both research and clinical assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6502069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65020692019-05-20 Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method Shepard, Timothy G. Hou, Fang Bex, Peter J. Lesmes, Luis A. Lu, Zhong-Lin Yu, Deyue J Vis Article Reading is a crucial visual activity and a fundamental skill in daily life. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) is a text-presentation paradigm that has been extensively used in the laboratory to study basic characteristics of reading performance. However, measuring reading function (reading speed vs. print size) is time-consuming for RSVP reading using conventional testing procedures. In this study, we develop a novel method, qReading, utilizing the Bayesian adaptive testing framework to measure reading function in the periphery. We perform both a psychophysical experiment and computer simulations to validate the qReading method. In the experiment, words are presented using an RSVP paradigm at 10° in the lower visual field. The reading function obtained from the qReading method with 50 trials exhibits good agreement (i.e., high accuracy) with the reading function obtained from a conventional method (method of constant stimuli [MCS]) with 186 trials (mean root mean square error: 0.12 log10 units). Simulations further confirm that the qReading method provides an unbiased measure. The qReading procedure also demonstrates excellent precision (half width of 68.2% credible interval: 0.02 log10 units with 50 trials) compared to the MCS method (0.03 log10 units with 186 trials). This investigation establishes that the qReading method can adequately measure the reading function in the normal periphery with high accuracy, precision, and efficiency, and is a potentially valuable tool for both research and clinical assessments. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6502069/ /pubmed/31058991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/19.5.5 Text en Copyright 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Shepard, Timothy G.
Hou, Fang
Bex, Peter J.
Lesmes, Luis A.
Lu, Zhong-Lin
Yu, Deyue
Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method
title Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method
title_full Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method
title_fullStr Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method
title_full_unstemmed Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method
title_short Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method
title_sort assessing reading performance in the periphery with a bayesian adaptive approach: the qreading method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31058991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/19.5.5
work_keys_str_mv AT shepardtimothyg assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod
AT houfang assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod
AT bexpeterj assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod
AT lesmesluisa assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod
AT luzhonglin assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod
AT yudeyue assessingreadingperformanceintheperipherywithabayesianadaptiveapproachtheqreadingmethod