Cargando…

Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics

Background and aim of the work: In 1803, the English physician Thomas Percival published Medical Ethics, a work destined to become a milestone in the development of modern codes of medical ethics, starting from the first edition of the American Medical Association’s ethical code. Notwithstanding the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sara, Patuzzo, Giada, Goracci, Rosagemma, Ciliberti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30333457
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v89i3.7050
_version_ 1783416210510053376
author Sara, Patuzzo
Giada, Goracci
Rosagemma, Ciliberti
author_facet Sara, Patuzzo
Giada, Goracci
Rosagemma, Ciliberti
author_sort Sara, Patuzzo
collection PubMed
description Background and aim of the work: In 1803, the English physician Thomas Percival published Medical Ethics, a work destined to become a milestone in the development of modern codes of medical ethics, starting from the first edition of the American Medical Association’s ethical code. Notwithstanding the undeniable influence that this book has exerted upon the codification of the principles of medical ethics, researchers and experts foster different and opposing points of views on its real nature. They question whether Medical Ethics truly belongs to the literary genre of codes of medical ethics or, better yet, to that of medical etiquettes. Methods:This debate is crucial in the field both of medical history and of medical ethics, with regard not only to Percival’s work, but also to the ethical value of the current codes of medical ethics and deontology. Results:The lack of a rigorous philosophical-moral analysis of the current medical codification is reflected in its mere loyalty to the legal regulation, in substantial continuity with the past. However, the constant challenges proposed by the biomedical development, require the need to rethink the traditional conceptual tools of the current codes of medical ethics, with the purpose to achieve new schemes and innovative solutions. Conclusions:On this perspective, when the codes of medical ethics are worked out by physicians, they could be considered as wrongly titled medical etiquettes. This consideration could regard current codes of medical ethics, that remain faithful to tradition and that would more probably be codes of medical etiquette with a wrong title. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6502118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65021182019-05-08 Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics Sara, Patuzzo Giada, Goracci Rosagemma, Ciliberti Acta Biomed Debate Background and aim of the work: In 1803, the English physician Thomas Percival published Medical Ethics, a work destined to become a milestone in the development of modern codes of medical ethics, starting from the first edition of the American Medical Association’s ethical code. Notwithstanding the undeniable influence that this book has exerted upon the codification of the principles of medical ethics, researchers and experts foster different and opposing points of views on its real nature. They question whether Medical Ethics truly belongs to the literary genre of codes of medical ethics or, better yet, to that of medical etiquettes. Methods:This debate is crucial in the field both of medical history and of medical ethics, with regard not only to Percival’s work, but also to the ethical value of the current codes of medical ethics and deontology. Results:The lack of a rigorous philosophical-moral analysis of the current medical codification is reflected in its mere loyalty to the legal regulation, in substantial continuity with the past. However, the constant challenges proposed by the biomedical development, require the need to rethink the traditional conceptual tools of the current codes of medical ethics, with the purpose to achieve new schemes and innovative solutions. Conclusions:On this perspective, when the codes of medical ethics are worked out by physicians, they could be considered as wrongly titled medical etiquettes. This consideration could regard current codes of medical ethics, that remain faithful to tradition and that would more probably be codes of medical etiquette with a wrong title. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6502118/ /pubmed/30333457 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v89i3.7050 Text en Copyright: © 2018 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Debate
Sara, Patuzzo
Giada, Goracci
Rosagemma, Ciliberti
Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics
title Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics
title_full Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics
title_fullStr Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics
title_full_unstemmed Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics
title_short Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics
title_sort thomas percival. discussing the foundation of medical ethics
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30333457
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v89i3.7050
work_keys_str_mv AT sarapatuzzo thomaspercivaldiscussingthefoundationofmedicalethics
AT giadagoracci thomaspercivaldiscussingthefoundationofmedicalethics
AT rosagemmaciliberti thomaspercivaldiscussingthefoundationofmedicalethics