Cargando…
Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review
OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been updated in the past several years, and various inconsistencies exist across these guidelines. Moreover, the quality of these updated guidelines has not been clarified. We thus conducted this systematic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023014 |
_version_ | 1783416235705237504 |
---|---|
author | Li-zhen, Liao Yun, Xu Xiao-Dong, Zhuang Shu-bin, Hong Zi-lian, Wang Adrian Sandra, Dobs Bin, Liu |
author_facet | Li-zhen, Liao Yun, Xu Xiao-Dong, Zhuang Shu-bin, Hong Zi-lian, Wang Adrian Sandra, Dobs Bin, Liu |
author_sort | Li-zhen, Liao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been updated in the past several years, and various inconsistencies exist across these guidelines. Moreover, the quality of these updated guidelines has not been clarified. We thus conducted this systematic review to evaluate the relationship between the quality and detailed recommendations of these guidelines. DATA SOURCES: The Guidelines International Network Library, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) database, the Medline database, the Embase and the National Guidelines Clearinghouse were searched for guidelines containing recommendations on screening and diagnosis strategies for GDM between 2009 and November 2018. METHODS: Guidelines included a target group of women with GDM, and contained recommendations for screening and diagnostic strategies for GDM were included in the present systematic review. Reviewers summarised recommendations on screening and diagnosis strategies from each guideline and rated the quality of guidelines by using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) criteria. RESULTS: A total of 459 citations were collected by the preliminary literature selection, and 16 guidelines that met the inclusion criteria were assessed. The inconsistencies of the guidelines mainly focus on the screening process (one step vs two step) and criteria of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups [IADPSG] vs CarpenterandCoustan). Guidelines with higher AGREE scores usually recommend a one-step OGTT strategy with IADPSG criteria between 24 and 28 gestational weeks, and the majority of these guidelines likely to select evidence by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines of WHO-2013, NICE-2015, American Diabetes Association-2018, Endocrine Society-2013, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada-2016, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics-2015, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists-2018, United States Preventive Services Task Force-2014 and IADPSG-2015 are strongly recommended in the present evaluation, according to the AGREE II criteria. Guidelines with higher quality tend to recommend a one-step 75 g OGTT strategy with IADPSG criteria between 24 and 28 gestational weeks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6502228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65022282019-05-21 Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review Li-zhen, Liao Yun, Xu Xiao-Dong, Zhuang Shu-bin, Hong Zi-lian, Wang Adrian Sandra, Dobs Bin, Liu BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been updated in the past several years, and various inconsistencies exist across these guidelines. Moreover, the quality of these updated guidelines has not been clarified. We thus conducted this systematic review to evaluate the relationship between the quality and detailed recommendations of these guidelines. DATA SOURCES: The Guidelines International Network Library, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) database, the Medline database, the Embase and the National Guidelines Clearinghouse were searched for guidelines containing recommendations on screening and diagnosis strategies for GDM between 2009 and November 2018. METHODS: Guidelines included a target group of women with GDM, and contained recommendations for screening and diagnostic strategies for GDM were included in the present systematic review. Reviewers summarised recommendations on screening and diagnosis strategies from each guideline and rated the quality of guidelines by using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) criteria. RESULTS: A total of 459 citations were collected by the preliminary literature selection, and 16 guidelines that met the inclusion criteria were assessed. The inconsistencies of the guidelines mainly focus on the screening process (one step vs two step) and criteria of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups [IADPSG] vs CarpenterandCoustan). Guidelines with higher AGREE scores usually recommend a one-step OGTT strategy with IADPSG criteria between 24 and 28 gestational weeks, and the majority of these guidelines likely to select evidence by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines of WHO-2013, NICE-2015, American Diabetes Association-2018, Endocrine Society-2013, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada-2016, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics-2015, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists-2018, United States Preventive Services Task Force-2014 and IADPSG-2015 are strongly recommended in the present evaluation, according to the AGREE II criteria. Guidelines with higher quality tend to recommend a one-step 75 g OGTT strategy with IADPSG criteria between 24 and 28 gestational weeks. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6502228/ /pubmed/31061012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023014 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Li-zhen, Liao Yun, Xu Xiao-Dong, Zhuang Shu-bin, Hong Zi-lian, Wang Adrian Sandra, Dobs Bin, Liu Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review |
title | Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review |
title_full | Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review |
title_short | Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review |
title_sort | evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizhenliao evaluationofguidelinesonthescreeninganddiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreview AT yunxu evaluationofguidelinesonthescreeninganddiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreview AT xiaodongzhuang evaluationofguidelinesonthescreeninganddiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreview AT shubinhong evaluationofguidelinesonthescreeninganddiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreview AT zilianwang evaluationofguidelinesonthescreeninganddiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreview AT adriansandradobs evaluationofguidelinesonthescreeninganddiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreview AT binliu evaluationofguidelinesonthescreeninganddiagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitussystematicreview |