Cargando…

Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Introduction The impact of donor age on liver transplantation is well known. Data on an appropriate donor age cut-off for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with a background of hepatitis C (HCV) is generally limited. The objective of this study was to determine whether limiting donor age to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dar, Faisal S, Khan, Nusrat Y, Ali, Rubab, Khokhar, Hamzah Khawar, Zia, Haseeb H, Bhatti, Abu Bakar H, Shah, Najmul H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31093473
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4174
_version_ 1783416237574848512
author Dar, Faisal S
Khan, Nusrat Y
Ali, Rubab
Khokhar, Hamzah Khawar
Zia, Haseeb H
Bhatti, Abu Bakar H
Shah, Najmul H
author_facet Dar, Faisal S
Khan, Nusrat Y
Ali, Rubab
Khokhar, Hamzah Khawar
Zia, Haseeb H
Bhatti, Abu Bakar H
Shah, Najmul H
author_sort Dar, Faisal S
collection PubMed
description Introduction The impact of donor age on liver transplantation is well known. Data on an appropriate donor age cut-off for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with a background of hepatitis C (HCV) is generally limited. The objective of this study was to determine whether limiting donor age to less than 35 years improved outcomes in patients with HCV-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Methods This was a retrospective review of 169 patients who underwent LDLT for HCV-related ESLD. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received grafts from donors ≤ 35 (Group 1) or > 35 (Group 2) years of age. Kaplan Meier curves were used to determine survival. Uni and multivariate analysis were performed to determine independent predictors of mortality. Results Mean donor age was 25.1 ± 5.2 and 40.1 ± 3.4 years (P < 0.0001). Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was seen in 11.7% patients in Group 1 versus 29.6% in Group 2 (P = 0.02). A significant difference in mortality was present between the two groups, i.e., 33.3% versus 15.8% (P = 0.04). The estimated four-year overall survival (OS) was 78% and 64% (P = 0.03). Upon doing univariate analysis, the donor age (P = 0.04) and EAD (P = 0.006) were found to be significant variables for mortality. On multivariate analysis, EAD was the only independent predictor of mortality (Hazard ratio: 2.6; confidence interval: 1.1 - 5.8; P = 0.01). Conclusion Opting for younger donors (≤ 35 years) for HCV-related ESLD patients lowers the risk of EAD and improves overall survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6502282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65022822019-05-15 Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation Dar, Faisal S Khan, Nusrat Y Ali, Rubab Khokhar, Hamzah Khawar Zia, Haseeb H Bhatti, Abu Bakar H Shah, Najmul H Cureus Transplantation Introduction The impact of donor age on liver transplantation is well known. Data on an appropriate donor age cut-off for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with a background of hepatitis C (HCV) is generally limited. The objective of this study was to determine whether limiting donor age to less than 35 years improved outcomes in patients with HCV-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Methods This was a retrospective review of 169 patients who underwent LDLT for HCV-related ESLD. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received grafts from donors ≤ 35 (Group 1) or > 35 (Group 2) years of age. Kaplan Meier curves were used to determine survival. Uni and multivariate analysis were performed to determine independent predictors of mortality. Results Mean donor age was 25.1 ± 5.2 and 40.1 ± 3.4 years (P < 0.0001). Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was seen in 11.7% patients in Group 1 versus 29.6% in Group 2 (P = 0.02). A significant difference in mortality was present between the two groups, i.e., 33.3% versus 15.8% (P = 0.04). The estimated four-year overall survival (OS) was 78% and 64% (P = 0.03). Upon doing univariate analysis, the donor age (P = 0.04) and EAD (P = 0.006) were found to be significant variables for mortality. On multivariate analysis, EAD was the only independent predictor of mortality (Hazard ratio: 2.6; confidence interval: 1.1 - 5.8; P = 0.01). Conclusion Opting for younger donors (≤ 35 years) for HCV-related ESLD patients lowers the risk of EAD and improves overall survival. Cureus 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6502282/ /pubmed/31093473 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4174 Text en Copyright © 2019, Dar et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Transplantation
Dar, Faisal S
Khan, Nusrat Y
Ali, Rubab
Khokhar, Hamzah Khawar
Zia, Haseeb H
Bhatti, Abu Bakar H
Shah, Najmul H
Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_full Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_fullStr Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_short Recipient Outcomes with Younger Donors Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
title_sort recipient outcomes with younger donors undergoing living donor liver transplantation
topic Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31093473
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4174
work_keys_str_mv AT darfaisals recipientoutcomeswithyoungerdonorsundergoinglivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT khannusraty recipientoutcomeswithyoungerdonorsundergoinglivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT alirubab recipientoutcomeswithyoungerdonorsundergoinglivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT khokharhamzahkhawar recipientoutcomeswithyoungerdonorsundergoinglivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT ziahaseebh recipientoutcomeswithyoungerdonorsundergoinglivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT bhattiabubakarh recipientoutcomeswithyoungerdonorsundergoinglivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT shahnajmulh recipientoutcomeswithyoungerdonorsundergoinglivingdonorlivertransplantation