Cargando…

Effects of restricting movement between root and canopy populations of woolly apple aphid

Movement of insect pests between spatially subdivided populations can allow them to recolonize areas where local extinction has occurred, increasing pest persistence. Populations of woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum [Hausmann]; Hemiptera: Aphididae), a worldwide pest of apple (Malus domestica [...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orpet, Robert J., Jones, Vincent P., Reganold, John P., Crowder, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31059561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216424
_version_ 1783416246902980608
author Orpet, Robert J.
Jones, Vincent P.
Reganold, John P.
Crowder, David W.
author_facet Orpet, Robert J.
Jones, Vincent P.
Reganold, John P.
Crowder, David W.
author_sort Orpet, Robert J.
collection PubMed
description Movement of insect pests between spatially subdivided populations can allow them to recolonize areas where local extinction has occurred, increasing pest persistence. Populations of woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum [Hausmann]; Hemiptera: Aphididae), a worldwide pest of apple (Malus domestica [Borkhausen]), occur both below- and aboveground. These spatially subdivided subpopulations encounter different abiotic conditions, natural enemies, and control tactics. Restricting movement between them might be an effective management tactic to decrease woolly apple aphid persistence and abundance. We examined this possibility in the field, using sticky barriers to restrict upward woolly apple aphid movement to tree canopies, and in the greenhouse, using mulches and sand amendments to restrict downward movement to roots. In the field, blocking aphid movement up tree trunks did not decrease the number of colonies in tree canopies. Instead, sticky-banded apple trees had higher aphid colony counts late in the study. Earwigs, which are woolly apple aphid predators, were excluded from tree canopies by sticky bands. In the greenhouse, fewer root galls (indicative of aphid feeding) occurred on trees in sandy potting media and on those with mulch (wood chips or paper slurry). Our results suggest that upward movement is less important than other factors that affect aboveground aerial woolly apple aphid population dynamics. In addition, apple orchards planted in sandier soils or with mulches may be partially protected from woolly apple aphid root feeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6502340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65023402019-05-23 Effects of restricting movement between root and canopy populations of woolly apple aphid Orpet, Robert J. Jones, Vincent P. Reganold, John P. Crowder, David W. PLoS One Research Article Movement of insect pests between spatially subdivided populations can allow them to recolonize areas where local extinction has occurred, increasing pest persistence. Populations of woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum [Hausmann]; Hemiptera: Aphididae), a worldwide pest of apple (Malus domestica [Borkhausen]), occur both below- and aboveground. These spatially subdivided subpopulations encounter different abiotic conditions, natural enemies, and control tactics. Restricting movement between them might be an effective management tactic to decrease woolly apple aphid persistence and abundance. We examined this possibility in the field, using sticky barriers to restrict upward woolly apple aphid movement to tree canopies, and in the greenhouse, using mulches and sand amendments to restrict downward movement to roots. In the field, blocking aphid movement up tree trunks did not decrease the number of colonies in tree canopies. Instead, sticky-banded apple trees had higher aphid colony counts late in the study. Earwigs, which are woolly apple aphid predators, were excluded from tree canopies by sticky bands. In the greenhouse, fewer root galls (indicative of aphid feeding) occurred on trees in sandy potting media and on those with mulch (wood chips or paper slurry). Our results suggest that upward movement is less important than other factors that affect aboveground aerial woolly apple aphid population dynamics. In addition, apple orchards planted in sandier soils or with mulches may be partially protected from woolly apple aphid root feeding. Public Library of Science 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6502340/ /pubmed/31059561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216424 Text en © 2019 Orpet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Orpet, Robert J.
Jones, Vincent P.
Reganold, John P.
Crowder, David W.
Effects of restricting movement between root and canopy populations of woolly apple aphid
title Effects of restricting movement between root and canopy populations of woolly apple aphid
title_full Effects of restricting movement between root and canopy populations of woolly apple aphid
title_fullStr Effects of restricting movement between root and canopy populations of woolly apple aphid
title_full_unstemmed Effects of restricting movement between root and canopy populations of woolly apple aphid
title_short Effects of restricting movement between root and canopy populations of woolly apple aphid
title_sort effects of restricting movement between root and canopy populations of woolly apple aphid
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31059561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216424
work_keys_str_mv AT orpetrobertj effectsofrestrictingmovementbetweenrootandcanopypopulationsofwoollyappleaphid
AT jonesvincentp effectsofrestrictingmovementbetweenrootandcanopypopulationsofwoollyappleaphid
AT reganoldjohnp effectsofrestrictingmovementbetweenrootandcanopypopulationsofwoollyappleaphid
AT crowderdavidw effectsofrestrictingmovementbetweenrootandcanopypopulationsofwoollyappleaphid