Cargando…
The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
Objective: To synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on opioid and pain medication reduction in patients with intractable spine or limb pain. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify RCTs of patients with chronic back and/or limb pai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118751 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186662 |
_version_ | 1783416262732283904 |
---|---|
author | Pollard, E Morgan Lamer, Tim J Moeschler, Susan M Gazelka, Halena M Hooten, W Michael Bendel, Markus A Warner, Nafisseh S Murad, M Hassan |
author_facet | Pollard, E Morgan Lamer, Tim J Moeschler, Susan M Gazelka, Halena M Hooten, W Michael Bendel, Markus A Warner, Nafisseh S Murad, M Hassan |
author_sort | Pollard, E Morgan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on opioid and pain medication reduction in patients with intractable spine or limb pain. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify RCTs of patients with chronic back and/or limb pain of greater than one year duration. Only comparative studies were included (ie, conventional SCS vs medical therapy, conventional SCS vs high-frequency SCS) and were required to have a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. Random effect meta-an alysis was used to compare the three interventions. Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We identified five trials enrolling 489 patients. Three of the trials reported the results as a number of patients who were able to reduce or eliminate opioid consumption in the SCS vs medical therapy group. The odds of reducing opioid consumption were significantly increased in the SCS group compared to medical therapy (OR 8.60, CI {1.93–38.30}). Two of the trials reported the results as mean medication dose reduction as measured by the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) in the SCS group vs medical therapy group. MQS score significantly decreased in the SCS group and not in the medical group (WMD –1.97, 95% CI {–3.67, –0.27}). One trial reported a number of patients in high-frequency SCS who were able to reduce opioids vs number of patients in conventional SCS group who were able to reduce opioids. Thirty-four percent of the patients in the high-frequency group and 26% of the patients in the conventional SCS group were able to reduce opioid consumption; however, there was not a significant difference between groups (OR 1.43, 95% CI {0.74, 2.78}). This trial also quantified the opioid reduction in morphine equivalent dosage (MED). In the high-frequency SCS group, average MED decreased by 24.8 mg vs average MED decrease of 7.3 mg in the conventional SCS group. Again, the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (–17.50, CI {–66.27, 31.27}). Conclusions: In patients with intractable spine/limb pain, SCS was associated with increased odds of reducing pain medication consumption. However, results should be treated with caution as available data were limited, and clinical significance of these findings requires further study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6502439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65024392019-05-22 The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis Pollard, E Morgan Lamer, Tim J Moeschler, Susan M Gazelka, Halena M Hooten, W Michael Bendel, Markus A Warner, Nafisseh S Murad, M Hassan J Pain Res Review Objective: To synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on opioid and pain medication reduction in patients with intractable spine or limb pain. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify RCTs of patients with chronic back and/or limb pain of greater than one year duration. Only comparative studies were included (ie, conventional SCS vs medical therapy, conventional SCS vs high-frequency SCS) and were required to have a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. Random effect meta-an alysis was used to compare the three interventions. Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We identified five trials enrolling 489 patients. Three of the trials reported the results as a number of patients who were able to reduce or eliminate opioid consumption in the SCS vs medical therapy group. The odds of reducing opioid consumption were significantly increased in the SCS group compared to medical therapy (OR 8.60, CI {1.93–38.30}). Two of the trials reported the results as mean medication dose reduction as measured by the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) in the SCS group vs medical therapy group. MQS score significantly decreased in the SCS group and not in the medical group (WMD –1.97, 95% CI {–3.67, –0.27}). One trial reported a number of patients in high-frequency SCS who were able to reduce opioids vs number of patients in conventional SCS group who were able to reduce opioids. Thirty-four percent of the patients in the high-frequency group and 26% of the patients in the conventional SCS group were able to reduce opioid consumption; however, there was not a significant difference between groups (OR 1.43, 95% CI {0.74, 2.78}). This trial also quantified the opioid reduction in morphine equivalent dosage (MED). In the high-frequency SCS group, average MED decreased by 24.8 mg vs average MED decrease of 7.3 mg in the conventional SCS group. Again, the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (–17.50, CI {–66.27, 31.27}). Conclusions: In patients with intractable spine/limb pain, SCS was associated with increased odds of reducing pain medication consumption. However, results should be treated with caution as available data were limited, and clinical significance of these findings requires further study. Dove 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6502439/ /pubmed/31118751 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186662 Text en © 2019 Pollard et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Pollard, E Morgan Lamer, Tim J Moeschler, Susan M Gazelka, Halena M Hooten, W Michael Bendel, Markus A Warner, Nafisseh S Murad, M Hassan The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis |
title | The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis |
title_full | The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis |
title_short | The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118751 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186662 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pollardemorgan theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT lamertimj theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT moeschlersusanm theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT gazelkahalenam theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT hootenwmichael theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT bendelmarkusa theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT warnernafissehs theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT muradmhassan theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT pollardemorgan effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT lamertimj effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT moeschlersusanm effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT gazelkahalenam effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT hootenwmichael effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT bendelmarkusa effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT warnernafissehs effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis AT muradmhassan effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis |