Cargando…

The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis

Objective: To synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on opioid and pain medication reduction in patients with intractable spine or limb pain. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify RCTs of patients with chronic back and/or limb pai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pollard, E Morgan, Lamer, Tim J, Moeschler, Susan M, Gazelka, Halena M, Hooten, W Michael, Bendel, Markus A, Warner, Nafisseh S, Murad, M Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118751
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186662
_version_ 1783416262732283904
author Pollard, E Morgan
Lamer, Tim J
Moeschler, Susan M
Gazelka, Halena M
Hooten, W Michael
Bendel, Markus A
Warner, Nafisseh S
Murad, M Hassan
author_facet Pollard, E Morgan
Lamer, Tim J
Moeschler, Susan M
Gazelka, Halena M
Hooten, W Michael
Bendel, Markus A
Warner, Nafisseh S
Murad, M Hassan
author_sort Pollard, E Morgan
collection PubMed
description Objective: To synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on opioid and pain medication reduction in patients with intractable spine or limb pain. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify RCTs of patients with chronic back and/or limb pain of greater than one year duration. Only comparative studies were included (ie, conventional SCS vs medical therapy, conventional SCS vs high-frequency SCS) and were required to have a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. Random effect meta-an alysis was used to compare the three interventions. Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We identified five trials enrolling 489 patients. Three of the trials reported the results as a number of patients who were able to reduce or eliminate opioid consumption in the SCS vs medical therapy group. The odds of reducing opioid consumption were significantly increased in the SCS group compared to medical therapy (OR 8.60, CI {1.93–38.30}). Two of the trials reported the results as mean medication dose reduction as measured by the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) in the SCS group vs medical therapy group. MQS score significantly decreased in the SCS group and not in the medical group (WMD –1.97, 95% CI {–3.67, –0.27}). One trial reported a number of patients in high-frequency SCS who were able to reduce opioids vs number of patients in conventional SCS group who were able to reduce opioids. Thirty-four percent of the patients in the high-frequency group and 26% of the patients in the conventional SCS group were able to reduce opioid consumption; however, there was not a significant difference between groups (OR 1.43, 95% CI {0.74, 2.78}). This trial also quantified the opioid reduction in morphine equivalent dosage (MED). In the high-frequency SCS group, average MED decreased by 24.8 mg vs average MED decrease of 7.3 mg in the conventional SCS group. Again, the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (–17.50, CI {–66.27, 31.27}). Conclusions: In patients with intractable spine/limb pain, SCS was associated with increased odds of reducing pain medication consumption. However, results should be treated with caution as available data were limited, and clinical significance of these findings requires further study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6502439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65024392019-05-22 The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis Pollard, E Morgan Lamer, Tim J Moeschler, Susan M Gazelka, Halena M Hooten, W Michael Bendel, Markus A Warner, Nafisseh S Murad, M Hassan J Pain Res Review Objective: To synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on opioid and pain medication reduction in patients with intractable spine or limb pain. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify RCTs of patients with chronic back and/or limb pain of greater than one year duration. Only comparative studies were included (ie, conventional SCS vs medical therapy, conventional SCS vs high-frequency SCS) and were required to have a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. Random effect meta-an alysis was used to compare the three interventions. Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We identified five trials enrolling 489 patients. Three of the trials reported the results as a number of patients who were able to reduce or eliminate opioid consumption in the SCS vs medical therapy group. The odds of reducing opioid consumption were significantly increased in the SCS group compared to medical therapy (OR 8.60, CI {1.93–38.30}). Two of the trials reported the results as mean medication dose reduction as measured by the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) in the SCS group vs medical therapy group. MQS score significantly decreased in the SCS group and not in the medical group (WMD –1.97, 95% CI {–3.67, –0.27}). One trial reported a number of patients in high-frequency SCS who were able to reduce opioids vs number of patients in conventional SCS group who were able to reduce opioids. Thirty-four percent of the patients in the high-frequency group and 26% of the patients in the conventional SCS group were able to reduce opioid consumption; however, there was not a significant difference between groups (OR 1.43, 95% CI {0.74, 2.78}). This trial also quantified the opioid reduction in morphine equivalent dosage (MED). In the high-frequency SCS group, average MED decreased by 24.8 mg vs average MED decrease of 7.3 mg in the conventional SCS group. Again, the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (–17.50, CI {–66.27, 31.27}). Conclusions: In patients with intractable spine/limb pain, SCS was associated with increased odds of reducing pain medication consumption. However, results should be treated with caution as available data were limited, and clinical significance of these findings requires further study. Dove 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6502439/ /pubmed/31118751 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186662 Text en © 2019 Pollard et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Pollard, E Morgan
Lamer, Tim J
Moeschler, Susan M
Gazelka, Halena M
Hooten, W Michael
Bendel, Markus A
Warner, Nafisseh S
Murad, M Hassan
The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
title The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
title_full The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
title_short The effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
title_sort effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain medication reduction in intractable spine and limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118751
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S186662
work_keys_str_mv AT pollardemorgan theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT lamertimj theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT moeschlersusanm theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT gazelkahalenam theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT hootenwmichael theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT bendelmarkusa theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT warnernafissehs theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT muradmhassan theeffectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT pollardemorgan effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT lamertimj effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT moeschlersusanm effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT gazelkahalenam effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT hootenwmichael effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT bendelmarkusa effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT warnernafissehs effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis
AT muradmhassan effectofspinalcordstimulationonpainmedicationreductioninintractablespineandlimbpainasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandmetaanalysis