Cargando…
Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo
Background: In clinical practice, common problem polypharmacy could result in the increased risks of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Co-administered imatinib (IMA) and voriconazole (VOR) as one treatment protocol in cancer patients with fungal infections are common.Purpose: The aim of the present stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118708 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S199526 |
_version_ | 1783416263707459584 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Qianmeng Xie, Saili Qiu, Xiangjun Chen, Jingjing Xu, Ren-Ai |
author_facet | Lin, Qianmeng Xie, Saili Qiu, Xiangjun Chen, Jingjing Xu, Ren-Ai |
author_sort | Lin, Qianmeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In clinical practice, common problem polypharmacy could result in the increased risks of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Co-administered imatinib (IMA) and voriconazole (VOR) as one treatment protocol in cancer patients with fungal infections are common.Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the potential DDIs associated with the concurrent use of IMA and VOR in rat liver microsomes (RLMs) and in rats.Methods and results: The concentration levels of IMA, VOR, and their metabolites N-desmethyl IMA (CGP74588) and N-oxide voriconazole (N-oxide VOR) were determined by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In vitro study of RLMs, VOR inhibited the IMA metabolism with the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of 105.20 μM, while IC(50) for IMA against VOR was 61.30 μM. After co-administered IMA and VOR in rats, the C(max) of IMA was increased significantly, while the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and C(max) of CGP74588 were decreased significantly. In addition, similar results were also found that the main pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), MRT(0→∞), T(max,) and C(max)) of VOR were increased significantly, while the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and C(max) of N-oxide VOR were decreased significantly. Incorporation of all the results indicated that both drugs had a inhibitory effect on each other’s metabolism in vitro and in vivo.Conclusion: Thus, it is of great value to monitor the concomitant use of IMA and VOR in the clinic to reduce the risks of unexpected clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6502443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65024432019-05-22 Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo Lin, Qianmeng Xie, Saili Qiu, Xiangjun Chen, Jingjing Xu, Ren-Ai Infect Drug Resist Original Research Background: In clinical practice, common problem polypharmacy could result in the increased risks of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Co-administered imatinib (IMA) and voriconazole (VOR) as one treatment protocol in cancer patients with fungal infections are common.Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the potential DDIs associated with the concurrent use of IMA and VOR in rat liver microsomes (RLMs) and in rats.Methods and results: The concentration levels of IMA, VOR, and their metabolites N-desmethyl IMA (CGP74588) and N-oxide voriconazole (N-oxide VOR) were determined by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In vitro study of RLMs, VOR inhibited the IMA metabolism with the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of 105.20 μM, while IC(50) for IMA against VOR was 61.30 μM. After co-administered IMA and VOR in rats, the C(max) of IMA was increased significantly, while the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and C(max) of CGP74588 were decreased significantly. In addition, similar results were also found that the main pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), MRT(0→∞), T(max,) and C(max)) of VOR were increased significantly, while the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and C(max) of N-oxide VOR were decreased significantly. Incorporation of all the results indicated that both drugs had a inhibitory effect on each other’s metabolism in vitro and in vivo.Conclusion: Thus, it is of great value to monitor the concomitant use of IMA and VOR in the clinic to reduce the risks of unexpected clinical outcomes. Dove 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6502443/ /pubmed/31118708 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S199526 Text en © 2019 Lin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lin, Qianmeng Xie, Saili Qiu, Xiangjun Chen, Jingjing Xu, Ren-Ai Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo |
title | Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo |
title_full | Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo |
title_fullStr | Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo |
title_full_unstemmed | Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo |
title_short | Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo |
title_sort | drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118708 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S199526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linqianmeng drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo AT xiesaili drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo AT qiuxiangjun drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo AT chenjingjing drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo AT xurenai drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo |