Cargando…

Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo

Background: In clinical practice, common problem polypharmacy could result in the increased risks of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Co-administered imatinib (IMA) and voriconazole (VOR) as one treatment protocol in cancer patients with fungal infections are common.Purpose: The aim of the present stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Qianmeng, Xie, Saili, Qiu, Xiangjun, Chen, Jingjing, Xu, Ren-Ai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118708
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S199526
_version_ 1783416263707459584
author Lin, Qianmeng
Xie, Saili
Qiu, Xiangjun
Chen, Jingjing
Xu, Ren-Ai
author_facet Lin, Qianmeng
Xie, Saili
Qiu, Xiangjun
Chen, Jingjing
Xu, Ren-Ai
author_sort Lin, Qianmeng
collection PubMed
description Background: In clinical practice, common problem polypharmacy could result in the increased risks of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Co-administered imatinib (IMA) and voriconazole (VOR) as one treatment protocol in cancer patients with fungal infections are common.Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the potential DDIs associated with the concurrent use of IMA and VOR in rat liver microsomes (RLMs) and in rats.Methods and results: The concentration levels of IMA, VOR, and their metabolites N-desmethyl IMA (CGP74588) and N-oxide voriconazole (N-oxide VOR) were determined by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In vitro study of RLMs, VOR inhibited the IMA metabolism with the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of 105.20 μM, while IC(50) for IMA against VOR was 61.30 μM. After co-administered IMA and VOR in rats, the C(max) of IMA was increased significantly, while the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and C(max) of CGP74588 were decreased significantly. In addition, similar results were also found that the main pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), MRT(0→∞), T(max,) and C(max)) of VOR were increased significantly, while the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and C(max) of N-oxide VOR were decreased significantly. Incorporation of all the results indicated that both drugs had a inhibitory effect on each other’s metabolism in vitro and in vivo.Conclusion: Thus, it is of great value to monitor the concomitant use of IMA and VOR in the clinic to reduce the risks of unexpected clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6502443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65024432019-05-22 Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo Lin, Qianmeng Xie, Saili Qiu, Xiangjun Chen, Jingjing Xu, Ren-Ai Infect Drug Resist Original Research Background: In clinical practice, common problem polypharmacy could result in the increased risks of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Co-administered imatinib (IMA) and voriconazole (VOR) as one treatment protocol in cancer patients with fungal infections are common.Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the potential DDIs associated with the concurrent use of IMA and VOR in rat liver microsomes (RLMs) and in rats.Methods and results: The concentration levels of IMA, VOR, and their metabolites N-desmethyl IMA (CGP74588) and N-oxide voriconazole (N-oxide VOR) were determined by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In vitro study of RLMs, VOR inhibited the IMA metabolism with the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of 105.20 μM, while IC(50) for IMA against VOR was 61.30 μM. After co-administered IMA and VOR in rats, the C(max) of IMA was increased significantly, while the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and C(max) of CGP74588 were decreased significantly. In addition, similar results were also found that the main pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), MRT(0→∞), T(max,) and C(max)) of VOR were increased significantly, while the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and C(max) of N-oxide VOR were decreased significantly. Incorporation of all the results indicated that both drugs had a inhibitory effect on each other’s metabolism in vitro and in vivo.Conclusion: Thus, it is of great value to monitor the concomitant use of IMA and VOR in the clinic to reduce the risks of unexpected clinical outcomes. Dove 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6502443/ /pubmed/31118708 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S199526 Text en © 2019 Lin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lin, Qianmeng
Xie, Saili
Qiu, Xiangjun
Chen, Jingjing
Xu, Ren-Ai
Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo
title Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo
title_full Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo
title_fullStr Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo
title_full_unstemmed Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo
title_short Drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo
title_sort drug–drug interaction study of imatinib and voriconazole in vitro and in vivo
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118708
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S199526
work_keys_str_mv AT linqianmeng drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo
AT xiesaili drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo
AT qiuxiangjun drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo
AT chenjingjing drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo
AT xurenai drugdruginteractionstudyofimatinibandvoriconazoleinvitroandinvivo