Cargando…

Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?

OBJECTIVES: Small animal maxillofacial models, such as non-segmental critical size defects (CSDs) in the rabbit mandible, need to be standardized for use as preclinical models of bone regeneration to mimic clinical conditions such as maxillofacial trauma. The objective of this study is the establish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlisle, Patricia L., Guda, Teja, Silliman, David T., Hale, Robert G., Brown Baer, Pamela R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106138
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.2.97
_version_ 1783416279762206720
author Carlisle, Patricia L.
Guda, Teja
Silliman, David T.
Hale, Robert G.
Brown Baer, Pamela R.
author_facet Carlisle, Patricia L.
Guda, Teja
Silliman, David T.
Hale, Robert G.
Brown Baer, Pamela R.
author_sort Carlisle, Patricia L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Small animal maxillofacial models, such as non-segmental critical size defects (CSDs) in the rabbit mandible, need to be standardized for use as preclinical models of bone regeneration to mimic clinical conditions such as maxillofacial trauma. The objective of this study is the establishment of a mechanically competent CSD model in the rabbit mandible to allow standardized evaluation of bone regeneration therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three sizes of bony defect were generated in the mandibular body of rabbit hemi-mandibles: 12 mm×5 mm, 12 mm×8 mm, and 15 mm×10 mm. The hemi-mandibles were tested to failure in 3-point flexure. The 12 mm×5 mm defect was then chosen for the defect size created in the mandibles of 26 rabbits with or without cautery of the defect margins and bone regeneration was assessed after 6 and 12 weeks. Regenerated bone density and volume were evaluated using radiography, micro-computed tomography, and histology. RESULTS: Flexural strength of the 12 mm×5 mm defect was similar to its contralateral; whereas the 12 mm×8 mm and 15 mm×10 mm groups carried significantly less load than their respective contralaterals (P<0.05). This demonstrated that the 12 mm×5 mm defect did not significantly compromise mandibular mechanical integrity. Significantly less (P<0.05) bone was regenerated at 6 weeks in cauterized defect margins compared to controls without cautery. After 12 weeks, the bone volume of the group with cautery increased to that of the control without cautery after 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: An empty defect size of 12 mm×5 mm in the rabbit mandibular model maintains sufficient mechanical stability to not require additional stabilization. However, this defect size allows for bone regeneration across the defect. Cautery of the defect only delays regeneration by 6 weeks suggesting that the performance of bone graft materials in mandibular defects of this size should be considered with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6502752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65027522019-05-17 Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible? Carlisle, Patricia L. Guda, Teja Silliman, David T. Hale, Robert G. Brown Baer, Pamela R. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: Small animal maxillofacial models, such as non-segmental critical size defects (CSDs) in the rabbit mandible, need to be standardized for use as preclinical models of bone regeneration to mimic clinical conditions such as maxillofacial trauma. The objective of this study is the establishment of a mechanically competent CSD model in the rabbit mandible to allow standardized evaluation of bone regeneration therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three sizes of bony defect were generated in the mandibular body of rabbit hemi-mandibles: 12 mm×5 mm, 12 mm×8 mm, and 15 mm×10 mm. The hemi-mandibles were tested to failure in 3-point flexure. The 12 mm×5 mm defect was then chosen for the defect size created in the mandibles of 26 rabbits with or without cautery of the defect margins and bone regeneration was assessed after 6 and 12 weeks. Regenerated bone density and volume were evaluated using radiography, micro-computed tomography, and histology. RESULTS: Flexural strength of the 12 mm×5 mm defect was similar to its contralateral; whereas the 12 mm×8 mm and 15 mm×10 mm groups carried significantly less load than their respective contralaterals (P<0.05). This demonstrated that the 12 mm×5 mm defect did not significantly compromise mandibular mechanical integrity. Significantly less (P<0.05) bone was regenerated at 6 weeks in cauterized defect margins compared to controls without cautery. After 12 weeks, the bone volume of the group with cautery increased to that of the control without cautery after 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: An empty defect size of 12 mm×5 mm in the rabbit mandibular model maintains sufficient mechanical stability to not require additional stabilization. However, this defect size allows for bone regeneration across the defect. Cautery of the defect only delays regeneration by 6 weeks suggesting that the performance of bone graft materials in mandibular defects of this size should be considered with caution. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2019-04 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6502752/ /pubmed/31106138 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.2.97 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Carlisle, Patricia L.
Guda, Teja
Silliman, David T.
Hale, Robert G.
Brown Baer, Pamela R.
Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?
title Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?
title_full Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?
title_fullStr Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?
title_full_unstemmed Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?
title_short Are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?
title_sort are critical size bone notch defects possible in the rabbit mandible?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31106138
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.2.97
work_keys_str_mv AT carlislepatricial arecriticalsizebonenotchdefectspossibleintherabbitmandible
AT gudateja arecriticalsizebonenotchdefectspossibleintherabbitmandible
AT sillimandavidt arecriticalsizebonenotchdefectspossibleintherabbitmandible
AT halerobertg arecriticalsizebonenotchdefectspossibleintherabbitmandible
AT brownbaerpamelar arecriticalsizebonenotchdefectspossibleintherabbitmandible