Cargando…

Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running

Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Björklund, Glenn, Swarén, Mikael, Born, Dennis-Peter, Stöggl, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506
_version_ 1783416350060838912
author Björklund, Glenn
Swarén, Mikael
Born, Dennis-Peter
Stöggl, Thomas
author_facet Björklund, Glenn
Swarén, Mikael
Born, Dennis-Peter
Stöggl, Thomas
author_sort Björklund, Glenn
collection PubMed
description Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years; stature: 179.5 ± 0.8 cm; body mass: 69.1 ± 7.4 kg) performed laboratory tests to determine [Formula: see text] O(2 max), running economy (RE), and anthropometric characteristics. On a separate day they performed an outdoor trail running time trial (two 3.5 km laps, total climb: 486 m) while we collected kinetic and time data. Comparing lap 2 with lap 1 (19:40 ± 1:57 min vs. 21:08 ± 2:09 min, P < 0.001), runners lost most time on the uphill sections and least on technical downhills (-2.5 ± 9.1 s). Inter-individual performance varied most for the downhills (CV > 25%) and least on flat terrain (CV < 10%). Overall stride cycle and ground contact time (GCT) were shorter in downhill than uphill sections (0.64 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09 s; 0.26 ± 0.03 vs. 0.46 ± 0.90 s, both P < 0.001). Force impulse was greatest on uphill (248 ± 46 vs. 175 ± 24 Ns, P < 0.001) and related to GCT (r = 0.904, P < 0.001). Peak force was greater during downhill than during uphill running (1106 ± 135 vs. 959 ± 104 N, P < 0.01). Performance was related to absolute and relative [Formula: see text] O(2 max) (P < 0.01), vertical uphill treadmill speed (P < 0.001) and fat percent (P < 0.01). Running uphill involved the greatest impulse per step due to longer GCT while downhill running generated the highest peak forces. [Formula: see text] O(2 max), vertical running speed and fat percent are important predictors for trail running performance. Performance between runners varied the most on downhills throughout the course, while pacing resembled a reversed J pattern. Future studies should focus on longer competition distances to verify these findings and with application of measures of 3D kinematics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6503082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65030822019-05-21 Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running Björklund, Glenn Swarén, Mikael Born, Dennis-Peter Stöggl, Thomas Front Physiol Physiology Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years; stature: 179.5 ± 0.8 cm; body mass: 69.1 ± 7.4 kg) performed laboratory tests to determine [Formula: see text] O(2 max), running economy (RE), and anthropometric characteristics. On a separate day they performed an outdoor trail running time trial (two 3.5 km laps, total climb: 486 m) while we collected kinetic and time data. Comparing lap 2 with lap 1 (19:40 ± 1:57 min vs. 21:08 ± 2:09 min, P < 0.001), runners lost most time on the uphill sections and least on technical downhills (-2.5 ± 9.1 s). Inter-individual performance varied most for the downhills (CV > 25%) and least on flat terrain (CV < 10%). Overall stride cycle and ground contact time (GCT) were shorter in downhill than uphill sections (0.64 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09 s; 0.26 ± 0.03 vs. 0.46 ± 0.90 s, both P < 0.001). Force impulse was greatest on uphill (248 ± 46 vs. 175 ± 24 Ns, P < 0.001) and related to GCT (r = 0.904, P < 0.001). Peak force was greater during downhill than during uphill running (1106 ± 135 vs. 959 ± 104 N, P < 0.01). Performance was related to absolute and relative [Formula: see text] O(2 max) (P < 0.01), vertical uphill treadmill speed (P < 0.001) and fat percent (P < 0.01). Running uphill involved the greatest impulse per step due to longer GCT while downhill running generated the highest peak forces. [Formula: see text] O(2 max), vertical running speed and fat percent are important predictors for trail running performance. Performance between runners varied the most on downhills throughout the course, while pacing resembled a reversed J pattern. Future studies should focus on longer competition distances to verify these findings and with application of measures of 3D kinematics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6503082/ /pubmed/31114511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506 Text en Copyright © 2019 Björklund, Swarén, Born and Stöggl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Björklund, Glenn
Swarén, Mikael
Born, Dennis-Peter
Stöggl, Thomas
Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_full Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_fullStr Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_short Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
title_sort biomechanical adaptations and performance indicators in short trail running
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506
work_keys_str_mv AT bjorklundglenn biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning
AT swarenmikael biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning
AT borndennispeter biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning
AT stogglthomas biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning