Cargando…
Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running
Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506 |
_version_ | 1783416350060838912 |
---|---|
author | Björklund, Glenn Swarén, Mikael Born, Dennis-Peter Stöggl, Thomas |
author_facet | Björklund, Glenn Swarén, Mikael Born, Dennis-Peter Stöggl, Thomas |
author_sort | Björklund, Glenn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years; stature: 179.5 ± 0.8 cm; body mass: 69.1 ± 7.4 kg) performed laboratory tests to determine [Formula: see text] O(2 max), running economy (RE), and anthropometric characteristics. On a separate day they performed an outdoor trail running time trial (two 3.5 km laps, total climb: 486 m) while we collected kinetic and time data. Comparing lap 2 with lap 1 (19:40 ± 1:57 min vs. 21:08 ± 2:09 min, P < 0.001), runners lost most time on the uphill sections and least on technical downhills (-2.5 ± 9.1 s). Inter-individual performance varied most for the downhills (CV > 25%) and least on flat terrain (CV < 10%). Overall stride cycle and ground contact time (GCT) were shorter in downhill than uphill sections (0.64 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09 s; 0.26 ± 0.03 vs. 0.46 ± 0.90 s, both P < 0.001). Force impulse was greatest on uphill (248 ± 46 vs. 175 ± 24 Ns, P < 0.001) and related to GCT (r = 0.904, P < 0.001). Peak force was greater during downhill than during uphill running (1106 ± 135 vs. 959 ± 104 N, P < 0.01). Performance was related to absolute and relative [Formula: see text] O(2 max) (P < 0.01), vertical uphill treadmill speed (P < 0.001) and fat percent (P < 0.01). Running uphill involved the greatest impulse per step due to longer GCT while downhill running generated the highest peak forces. [Formula: see text] O(2 max), vertical running speed and fat percent are important predictors for trail running performance. Performance between runners varied the most on downhills throughout the course, while pacing resembled a reversed J pattern. Future studies should focus on longer competition distances to verify these findings and with application of measures of 3D kinematics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6503082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65030822019-05-21 Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running Björklund, Glenn Swarén, Mikael Born, Dennis-Peter Stöggl, Thomas Front Physiol Physiology Our aims were to measure anthropometric and oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) variables in the laboratory, to measure kinetic and stride characteristics during a trail running time trial, and then analyse the data for correlations with trail running performance. Runners (13 men, 4 women: mean age: 29 ± 5 years; stature: 179.5 ± 0.8 cm; body mass: 69.1 ± 7.4 kg) performed laboratory tests to determine [Formula: see text] O(2 max), running economy (RE), and anthropometric characteristics. On a separate day they performed an outdoor trail running time trial (two 3.5 km laps, total climb: 486 m) while we collected kinetic and time data. Comparing lap 2 with lap 1 (19:40 ± 1:57 min vs. 21:08 ± 2:09 min, P < 0.001), runners lost most time on the uphill sections and least on technical downhills (-2.5 ± 9.1 s). Inter-individual performance varied most for the downhills (CV > 25%) and least on flat terrain (CV < 10%). Overall stride cycle and ground contact time (GCT) were shorter in downhill than uphill sections (0.64 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.09 s; 0.26 ± 0.03 vs. 0.46 ± 0.90 s, both P < 0.001). Force impulse was greatest on uphill (248 ± 46 vs. 175 ± 24 Ns, P < 0.001) and related to GCT (r = 0.904, P < 0.001). Peak force was greater during downhill than during uphill running (1106 ± 135 vs. 959 ± 104 N, P < 0.01). Performance was related to absolute and relative [Formula: see text] O(2 max) (P < 0.01), vertical uphill treadmill speed (P < 0.001) and fat percent (P < 0.01). Running uphill involved the greatest impulse per step due to longer GCT while downhill running generated the highest peak forces. [Formula: see text] O(2 max), vertical running speed and fat percent are important predictors for trail running performance. Performance between runners varied the most on downhills throughout the course, while pacing resembled a reversed J pattern. Future studies should focus on longer competition distances to verify these findings and with application of measures of 3D kinematics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6503082/ /pubmed/31114511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506 Text en Copyright © 2019 Björklund, Swarén, Born and Stöggl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Björklund, Glenn Swarén, Mikael Born, Dennis-Peter Stöggl, Thomas Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title | Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_full | Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_short | Biomechanical Adaptations and Performance Indicators in Short Trail Running |
title_sort | biomechanical adaptations and performance indicators in short trail running |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bjorklundglenn biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning AT swarenmikael biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning AT borndennispeter biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning AT stogglthomas biomechanicaladaptationsandperformanceindicatorsinshorttrailrunning |