Cargando…

Continuous Objective Assessment of Near Work

Evidence regarding the role of near work in myopia is conflicting. We developed the RangeLife, a device for continuous, objective measurement of working distance. Four devices were built, calibrated, and validated. Then, adult subjects wore the device on weekdays and weekend days, while simultaneous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Rachel, Bakshi, Suyash, Ostrin, Edwin J., Ostrin, Lisa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43408-y
_version_ 1783416359607074816
author Williams, Rachel
Bakshi, Suyash
Ostrin, Edwin J.
Ostrin, Lisa A.
author_facet Williams, Rachel
Bakshi, Suyash
Ostrin, Edwin J.
Ostrin, Lisa A.
author_sort Williams, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Evidence regarding the role of near work in myopia is conflicting. We developed the RangeLife, a device for continuous, objective measurement of working distance. Four devices were built, calibrated, and validated. Then, adult subjects wore the device on weekdays and weekend days, while simultaneously wearing an actigraph device for objective measurements of light exposure and activity. Subjects maintained an activity log and answered a visual activity questionnaire. RangeLife data were downloaded and binned into 0.10 m intervals. Objective diopter hours (dh), a weighted measure of near work, were calculated. Diopter hours for all subjects were significantly higher on weekdays (14.73 ± 4.67 dh) compared to weekends (11.90 ± 4.84 dh, p = 0.05). 94 ± 1.85% of near and intermediate viewing distances were recorded when the subjects were exposed to mesopic and indoor photopic light levels (<1000 lux), and 80.03 ± 2.11% during periods of sedentary physical activity (<320 counts per minute). Subjective reports of time viewing near and intermediate distances significantly overestimated objective measures (p = 0.002). The RangeLife was shown to provide reliable measures of viewing distance, and can be further utilized to understand potential influences of viewing behaviors on refractive error.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6503122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65031222019-05-20 Continuous Objective Assessment of Near Work Williams, Rachel Bakshi, Suyash Ostrin, Edwin J. Ostrin, Lisa A. Sci Rep Article Evidence regarding the role of near work in myopia is conflicting. We developed the RangeLife, a device for continuous, objective measurement of working distance. Four devices were built, calibrated, and validated. Then, adult subjects wore the device on weekdays and weekend days, while simultaneously wearing an actigraph device for objective measurements of light exposure and activity. Subjects maintained an activity log and answered a visual activity questionnaire. RangeLife data were downloaded and binned into 0.10 m intervals. Objective diopter hours (dh), a weighted measure of near work, were calculated. Diopter hours for all subjects were significantly higher on weekdays (14.73 ± 4.67 dh) compared to weekends (11.90 ± 4.84 dh, p = 0.05). 94 ± 1.85% of near and intermediate viewing distances were recorded when the subjects were exposed to mesopic and indoor photopic light levels (<1000 lux), and 80.03 ± 2.11% during periods of sedentary physical activity (<320 counts per minute). Subjective reports of time viewing near and intermediate distances significantly overestimated objective measures (p = 0.002). The RangeLife was shown to provide reliable measures of viewing distance, and can be further utilized to understand potential influences of viewing behaviors on refractive error. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6503122/ /pubmed/31061427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43408-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Williams, Rachel
Bakshi, Suyash
Ostrin, Edwin J.
Ostrin, Lisa A.
Continuous Objective Assessment of Near Work
title Continuous Objective Assessment of Near Work
title_full Continuous Objective Assessment of Near Work
title_fullStr Continuous Objective Assessment of Near Work
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Objective Assessment of Near Work
title_short Continuous Objective Assessment of Near Work
title_sort continuous objective assessment of near work
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43408-y
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsrachel continuousobjectiveassessmentofnearwork
AT bakshisuyash continuousobjectiveassessmentofnearwork
AT ostrinedwinj continuousobjectiveassessmentofnearwork
AT ostrinlisaa continuousobjectiveassessmentofnearwork