Cargando…

The tertiary hospital laboratory; a novel avenue of opportunistic screening of familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common monogenic hereditary lipid disorder characterised by increased serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol) concentrations and high risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of FH identified in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirzaee, Sam, Choy, Kay W., Doery, James C.G., Zaman, Sarah, Cameron, James D., Nasis, Arthur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100354
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common monogenic hereditary lipid disorder characterised by increased serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol) concentrations and high risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of FH identified in a tertiary hospital laboratory was investigated by performing an opportunistic screen for index cases. METHODS: The prevalence of likely FH based on LDL-cholesterol thresholds >4.9 mmol/L as employed by the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria (DLCNC) score was evaluated retrospectively in a single tertiary hospital laboratory over a six-month period (July to December 2016). RESULTS: 4943 lipid profiles screened, 106 patients (mean age 53.2 ± 12.9 and 41% male) had LDL-cholesterol of >4.9 mmol/L after exclusion of 5 patients (0.1%) with secondary causes. Possible (n = 90) and probable/definite (n = 16) FH according to DLCNC score was seen in 1.8% and 0.4% of the overall screened population, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Point prevalence of screening for FH in patients undergoing lipid profile testing in a tertiary hospital laboratory was comparable with prevalence of FH in general population (based on 1 in 200–250). This supports the benefit of establishing an efficient “alert system” in conjunction with a trigger “reflex testing” to facilitate further formal FH scoring and exclusion of possible secondary causes of hyperlipidemia in potential index FH.