Cargando…
Susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacilli from hospital- and community-acquired intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: a 2016–2017 update of the Chinese SMART study
Objectives: To update the epidemiology and susceptibility of hospital-acquired (HA) and community-acquired (CA), as well as intensive care unit (ICU) vs non-ICU-derived intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens in Chinese hospitals. Methods: A total of 2,546 Gram-ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118698 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S203572 |
_version_ | 1783416382392631296 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Hui Johnson, Aaron Zhang, Ge Yang, Yang Zhang, Jingjia Li, Dongxue Duan, Simeng Yang, Qiwen Xu, Yingchun |
author_facet | Zhang, Hui Johnson, Aaron Zhang, Ge Yang, Yang Zhang, Jingjia Li, Dongxue Duan, Simeng Yang, Qiwen Xu, Yingchun |
author_sort | Zhang, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: To update the epidemiology and susceptibility of hospital-acquired (HA) and community-acquired (CA), as well as intensive care unit (ICU) vs non-ICU-derived intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens in Chinese hospitals. Methods: A total of 2,546 Gram-negative isolates from IAIs and 1,947 isolates from UTIs collected in 16 hospitals and 7 regions of China from 2016 to 2017 were analyzed. Results: E. coli and K. pneumoniae were the most common pathogens identified in HA (40.7%, 21.9%) and CA (49.2%, 21.3%) IAIs and in HA (59.0%, 17.3%) and CA (64.3%, 12.7%) UTIs, respectively. The overall rates of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive strains were 48.2% for E. coli and 26.4% for K. pneumoniae. The rates of ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains were significantly higher in HA than in CA IAIs (51.7% vs 42.4%, P=0.016 and 22.0% vs 20.6%, P<0.001). IAI E. coli ESBL-producing isolates were most susceptible to IPM (97.2%) and AMK (93.9%), and UTI-associated E. coli ESBL-producers were 94.74% susceptible to amikacin (AMK), 97.02% to imipenem (IPM), and 91.4% to ertapenem (ETP). IAI K. pneumoniae ESBL-producing isolates were most susceptible to AMK (84.43%) and IPM (82.79%), and UTI-associated K. pneumoniae ESBL-producers were 88.39% susceptible to AMK, 87.5% to IPM, and 82.14% to ETP. Overall, percentages of susceptible strains to ETP, IPM, AMK, and Piperacillin-Tazobactam (TZP) were in the range of 82.0% to 96.4%, to 5 cephalosporins in the range of 31.4%-69.6% and to 2 fluoroquinolones in the range of 37.8%-45.5% for E. coli and 65.5%-90.7%, 37.7%-75.3%, and 43.9%-73.2% for K. pneumoniae, respectively. Conclusion: E. coli and K. pneumoniae continued to be the main pathogens in Chinese UTIs and IAIs with high ESBL-positive rates between 2016 and 2017. Carbapenem- or amikacin-based therapies were the most effective to combat IAI and UTI pathogens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6503304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65033042019-05-22 Susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacilli from hospital- and community-acquired intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: a 2016–2017 update of the Chinese SMART study Zhang, Hui Johnson, Aaron Zhang, Ge Yang, Yang Zhang, Jingjia Li, Dongxue Duan, Simeng Yang, Qiwen Xu, Yingchun Infect Drug Resist Original Research Objectives: To update the epidemiology and susceptibility of hospital-acquired (HA) and community-acquired (CA), as well as intensive care unit (ICU) vs non-ICU-derived intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens in Chinese hospitals. Methods: A total of 2,546 Gram-negative isolates from IAIs and 1,947 isolates from UTIs collected in 16 hospitals and 7 regions of China from 2016 to 2017 were analyzed. Results: E. coli and K. pneumoniae were the most common pathogens identified in HA (40.7%, 21.9%) and CA (49.2%, 21.3%) IAIs and in HA (59.0%, 17.3%) and CA (64.3%, 12.7%) UTIs, respectively. The overall rates of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive strains were 48.2% for E. coli and 26.4% for K. pneumoniae. The rates of ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains were significantly higher in HA than in CA IAIs (51.7% vs 42.4%, P=0.016 and 22.0% vs 20.6%, P<0.001). IAI E. coli ESBL-producing isolates were most susceptible to IPM (97.2%) and AMK (93.9%), and UTI-associated E. coli ESBL-producers were 94.74% susceptible to amikacin (AMK), 97.02% to imipenem (IPM), and 91.4% to ertapenem (ETP). IAI K. pneumoniae ESBL-producing isolates were most susceptible to AMK (84.43%) and IPM (82.79%), and UTI-associated K. pneumoniae ESBL-producers were 88.39% susceptible to AMK, 87.5% to IPM, and 82.14% to ETP. Overall, percentages of susceptible strains to ETP, IPM, AMK, and Piperacillin-Tazobactam (TZP) were in the range of 82.0% to 96.4%, to 5 cephalosporins in the range of 31.4%-69.6% and to 2 fluoroquinolones in the range of 37.8%-45.5% for E. coli and 65.5%-90.7%, 37.7%-75.3%, and 43.9%-73.2% for K. pneumoniae, respectively. Conclusion: E. coli and K. pneumoniae continued to be the main pathogens in Chinese UTIs and IAIs with high ESBL-positive rates between 2016 and 2017. Carbapenem- or amikacin-based therapies were the most effective to combat IAI and UTI pathogens. Dove 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6503304/ /pubmed/31118698 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S203572 Text en © 2019 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zhang, Hui Johnson, Aaron Zhang, Ge Yang, Yang Zhang, Jingjia Li, Dongxue Duan, Simeng Yang, Qiwen Xu, Yingchun Susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacilli from hospital- and community-acquired intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: a 2016–2017 update of the Chinese SMART study |
title | Susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacilli from hospital- and community-acquired intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: a 2016–2017 update of the Chinese SMART study |
title_full | Susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacilli from hospital- and community-acquired intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: a 2016–2017 update of the Chinese SMART study |
title_fullStr | Susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacilli from hospital- and community-acquired intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: a 2016–2017 update of the Chinese SMART study |
title_full_unstemmed | Susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacilli from hospital- and community-acquired intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: a 2016–2017 update of the Chinese SMART study |
title_short | Susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacilli from hospital- and community-acquired intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: a 2016–2017 update of the Chinese SMART study |
title_sort | susceptibilities of gram-negative bacilli from hospital- and community-acquired intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections: a 2016–2017 update of the chinese smart study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118698 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S203572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghui susceptibilitiesofgramnegativebacillifromhospitalandcommunityacquiredintraabdominalandurinarytractinfectionsa20162017updateofthechinesesmartstudy AT johnsonaaron susceptibilitiesofgramnegativebacillifromhospitalandcommunityacquiredintraabdominalandurinarytractinfectionsa20162017updateofthechinesesmartstudy AT zhangge susceptibilitiesofgramnegativebacillifromhospitalandcommunityacquiredintraabdominalandurinarytractinfectionsa20162017updateofthechinesesmartstudy AT yangyang susceptibilitiesofgramnegativebacillifromhospitalandcommunityacquiredintraabdominalandurinarytractinfectionsa20162017updateofthechinesesmartstudy AT zhangjingjia susceptibilitiesofgramnegativebacillifromhospitalandcommunityacquiredintraabdominalandurinarytractinfectionsa20162017updateofthechinesesmartstudy AT lidongxue susceptibilitiesofgramnegativebacillifromhospitalandcommunityacquiredintraabdominalandurinarytractinfectionsa20162017updateofthechinesesmartstudy AT duansimeng susceptibilitiesofgramnegativebacillifromhospitalandcommunityacquiredintraabdominalandurinarytractinfectionsa20162017updateofthechinesesmartstudy AT yangqiwen susceptibilitiesofgramnegativebacillifromhospitalandcommunityacquiredintraabdominalandurinarytractinfectionsa20162017updateofthechinesesmartstudy AT xuyingchun susceptibilitiesofgramnegativebacillifromhospitalandcommunityacquiredintraabdominalandurinarytractinfectionsa20162017updateofthechinesesmartstudy |