Cargando…
Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that acetate-buffered infusions result in better hemodynamic stabilization than 0.9% saline in patients undergoing major surgery. The choice of buffer in balanced crystalloid solutions may modify their hemodynamic effects. We therefore compared the inopressor req...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8 |
_version_ | 1783416400514121728 |
---|---|
author | Pfortmueller, Carmen A. Faeh, Livia Müller, Martin Eberle, Balthasar Jenni, Hansjörg Zante, Björn Prazak, Josef Englberger, Lars Takala, Jukka Jakob, Stephan M. |
author_facet | Pfortmueller, Carmen A. Faeh, Livia Müller, Martin Eberle, Balthasar Jenni, Hansjörg Zante, Björn Prazak, Josef Englberger, Lars Takala, Jukka Jakob, Stephan M. |
author_sort | Pfortmueller, Carmen A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that acetate-buffered infusions result in better hemodynamic stabilization than 0.9% saline in patients undergoing major surgery. The choice of buffer in balanced crystalloid solutions may modify their hemodynamic effects. We therefore compared the inopressor requirements of Ringer’s acetate and lactate for perioperative fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Using a randomized controlled double-blind design, we compared Ringer’s acetate (RA) to Ringer’s lactate (RL) with respect to the average rate of inopressor administered until postoperative hemodynamic stabilization was achieved. Secondary outcomes were the cumulative dose of inopressors, the duration of inopressor administration, the total fluid volume administered, and the changes in acid-base homeostasis. Patients undergoing elective valvular cardiac surgery were included. Patients with severe cardiac, renal, or liver disease were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were randomly allocated to the RA arm, 73 to the RL. The hemodynamic profiles were comparable between the groups. The groups did not differ with respect to the average rate of inopressors (RA 2.1 mcg/kg/h, IQR 0.5–8.1 vs. RL 1.7 mcg/kg/h, IQR 0.7–8.2, p = 0.989). Cumulative doses of inopressors and time on individual and combined inopressors did not differ between the groups. No differences were found in acid-base parameters and their evolution over time. CONCLUSION: In this study, hemodynamic profiles of patients receiving Ringer’s lactate and Ringer’s acetate were comparable, and the evolution of acid-base parameters was similar. These study findings should be evaluated in larger, multi-center studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02895659. Registered 16 September 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6503387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65033872019-05-10 Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT) Pfortmueller, Carmen A. Faeh, Livia Müller, Martin Eberle, Balthasar Jenni, Hansjörg Zante, Björn Prazak, Josef Englberger, Lars Takala, Jukka Jakob, Stephan M. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that acetate-buffered infusions result in better hemodynamic stabilization than 0.9% saline in patients undergoing major surgery. The choice of buffer in balanced crystalloid solutions may modify their hemodynamic effects. We therefore compared the inopressor requirements of Ringer’s acetate and lactate for perioperative fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Using a randomized controlled double-blind design, we compared Ringer’s acetate (RA) to Ringer’s lactate (RL) with respect to the average rate of inopressor administered until postoperative hemodynamic stabilization was achieved. Secondary outcomes were the cumulative dose of inopressors, the duration of inopressor administration, the total fluid volume administered, and the changes in acid-base homeostasis. Patients undergoing elective valvular cardiac surgery were included. Patients with severe cardiac, renal, or liver disease were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were randomly allocated to the RA arm, 73 to the RL. The hemodynamic profiles were comparable between the groups. The groups did not differ with respect to the average rate of inopressors (RA 2.1 mcg/kg/h, IQR 0.5–8.1 vs. RL 1.7 mcg/kg/h, IQR 0.7–8.2, p = 0.989). Cumulative doses of inopressors and time on individual and combined inopressors did not differ between the groups. No differences were found in acid-base parameters and their evolution over time. CONCLUSION: In this study, hemodynamic profiles of patients receiving Ringer’s lactate and Ringer’s acetate were comparable, and the evolution of acid-base parameters was similar. These study findings should be evaluated in larger, multi-center studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02895659. Registered 16 September 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6503387/ /pubmed/31060591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Pfortmueller, Carmen A. Faeh, Livia Müller, Martin Eberle, Balthasar Jenni, Hansjörg Zante, Björn Prazak, Josef Englberger, Lars Takala, Jukka Jakob, Stephan M. Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT) |
title | Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT) |
title_full | Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT) |
title_fullStr | Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT) |
title_short | Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT) |
title_sort | fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (hemacetat) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pfortmuellercarmena fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat AT faehlivia fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat AT mullermartin fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat AT eberlebalthasar fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat AT jennihansjorg fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat AT zantebjorn fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat AT prazakjosef fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat AT englbergerlars fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat AT takalajukka fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat AT jakobstephanm fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat |