Cargando…

Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that acetate-buffered infusions result in better hemodynamic stabilization than 0.9% saline in patients undergoing major surgery. The choice of buffer in balanced crystalloid solutions may modify their hemodynamic effects. We therefore compared the inopressor req...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfortmueller, Carmen A., Faeh, Livia, Müller, Martin, Eberle, Balthasar, Jenni, Hansjörg, Zante, Björn, Prazak, Josef, Englberger, Lars, Takala, Jukka, Jakob, Stephan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8
_version_ 1783416400514121728
author Pfortmueller, Carmen A.
Faeh, Livia
Müller, Martin
Eberle, Balthasar
Jenni, Hansjörg
Zante, Björn
Prazak, Josef
Englberger, Lars
Takala, Jukka
Jakob, Stephan M.
author_facet Pfortmueller, Carmen A.
Faeh, Livia
Müller, Martin
Eberle, Balthasar
Jenni, Hansjörg
Zante, Björn
Prazak, Josef
Englberger, Lars
Takala, Jukka
Jakob, Stephan M.
author_sort Pfortmueller, Carmen A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that acetate-buffered infusions result in better hemodynamic stabilization than 0.9% saline in patients undergoing major surgery. The choice of buffer in balanced crystalloid solutions may modify their hemodynamic effects. We therefore compared the inopressor requirements of Ringer’s acetate and lactate for perioperative fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Using a randomized controlled double-blind design, we compared Ringer’s acetate (RA) to Ringer’s lactate (RL) with respect to the average rate of inopressor administered until postoperative hemodynamic stabilization was achieved. Secondary outcomes were the cumulative dose of inopressors, the duration of inopressor administration, the total fluid volume administered, and the changes in acid-base homeostasis. Patients undergoing elective valvular cardiac surgery were included. Patients with severe cardiac, renal, or liver disease were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were randomly allocated to the RA arm, 73 to the RL. The hemodynamic profiles were comparable between the groups. The groups did not differ with respect to the average rate of inopressors (RA 2.1 mcg/kg/h, IQR 0.5–8.1 vs. RL 1.7 mcg/kg/h, IQR 0.7–8.2, p = 0.989). Cumulative doses of inopressors and time on individual and combined inopressors did not differ between the groups. No differences were found in acid-base parameters and their evolution over time. CONCLUSION: In this study, hemodynamic profiles of patients receiving Ringer’s lactate and Ringer’s acetate were comparable, and the evolution of acid-base parameters was similar. These study findings should be evaluated in larger, multi-center studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02895659. Registered 16 September 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6503387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65033872019-05-10 Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT) Pfortmueller, Carmen A. Faeh, Livia Müller, Martin Eberle, Balthasar Jenni, Hansjörg Zante, Björn Prazak, Josef Englberger, Lars Takala, Jukka Jakob, Stephan M. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that acetate-buffered infusions result in better hemodynamic stabilization than 0.9% saline in patients undergoing major surgery. The choice of buffer in balanced crystalloid solutions may modify their hemodynamic effects. We therefore compared the inopressor requirements of Ringer’s acetate and lactate for perioperative fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Using a randomized controlled double-blind design, we compared Ringer’s acetate (RA) to Ringer’s lactate (RL) with respect to the average rate of inopressor administered until postoperative hemodynamic stabilization was achieved. Secondary outcomes were the cumulative dose of inopressors, the duration of inopressor administration, the total fluid volume administered, and the changes in acid-base homeostasis. Patients undergoing elective valvular cardiac surgery were included. Patients with severe cardiac, renal, or liver disease were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were randomly allocated to the RA arm, 73 to the RL. The hemodynamic profiles were comparable between the groups. The groups did not differ with respect to the average rate of inopressors (RA 2.1 mcg/kg/h, IQR 0.5–8.1 vs. RL 1.7 mcg/kg/h, IQR 0.7–8.2, p = 0.989). Cumulative doses of inopressors and time on individual and combined inopressors did not differ between the groups. No differences were found in acid-base parameters and their evolution over time. CONCLUSION: In this study, hemodynamic profiles of patients receiving Ringer’s lactate and Ringer’s acetate were comparable, and the evolution of acid-base parameters was similar. These study findings should be evaluated in larger, multi-center studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02895659. Registered 16 September 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6503387/ /pubmed/31060591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Pfortmueller, Carmen A.
Faeh, Livia
Müller, Martin
Eberle, Balthasar
Jenni, Hansjörg
Zante, Björn
Prazak, Josef
Englberger, Lars
Takala, Jukka
Jakob, Stephan M.
Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)
title Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)
title_full Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)
title_fullStr Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)
title_full_unstemmed Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)
title_short Fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (HEMACETAT)
title_sort fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: effects of an acetate- versus lactate-buffered balanced infusion solution on hemodynamic stability (hemacetat)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2423-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pfortmuellercarmena fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat
AT faehlivia fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat
AT mullermartin fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat
AT eberlebalthasar fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat
AT jennihansjorg fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat
AT zantebjorn fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat
AT prazakjosef fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat
AT englbergerlars fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat
AT takalajukka fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat
AT jakobstephanm fluidmanagementinpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryeffectsofanacetateversuslactatebufferedbalancedinfusionsolutiononhemodynamicstabilityhemacetat