Cargando…

Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of geographic access to inpatient palliative and end of life care (PEoLC) facilities in place of death and how geographic access varies by settlement (urban and rural). This study aims to fill this evidence gap. METHODS: Individual-level death data in 2014...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chukwusa, Emeka, Verne, Julia, Polato, Giovanna, Taylor, Ros, J Higginson, Irene, Gao, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-019-0172-1
_version_ 1783416411759050752
author Chukwusa, Emeka
Verne, Julia
Polato, Giovanna
Taylor, Ros
J Higginson, Irene
Gao, Wei
author_facet Chukwusa, Emeka
Verne, Julia
Polato, Giovanna
Taylor, Ros
J Higginson, Irene
Gao, Wei
author_sort Chukwusa, Emeka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of geographic access to inpatient palliative and end of life care (PEoLC) facilities in place of death and how geographic access varies by settlement (urban and rural). This study aims to fill this evidence gap. METHODS: Individual-level death data in 2014 (N = 430,467, aged 25 +) were extracted from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) death registry and linked to the ONS postcode directory file to derive settlement of the deceased. Drive times from patients’ place of residence to nearest inpatient PEoLC facilities were used as a proxy estimate of geographic access. A modified Poisson regression was used to examine the association between geographic access to PEoLC facilities and place of death, adjusting for patients’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Two models were developed to evaluate the association between geographic access to inpatient PEoLC facilities and place of death. Model 1 compared access to hospice, for hospice deaths versus home deaths, and Model 2 compared access to hospitals, for hospital deaths versus home deaths. The magnitude of association was measured using adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs). RESULTS: We found an inverse association between drive time to hospice and hospice deaths (Model 1), with a dose–response relationship. Patients who lived more than 10 min away from inpatient PEoLC facilities in rural areas (Model 1: APR range 0.49–0.80; Model 2: APR range 0.79–0.98) and urban areas (Model 1: APR range 0.50–0.83; Model 2: APR range 0.98–0.99) were less likely to die there, compared to those who lived closer (i.e. ≤ 10 min drive time). The effects were larger in rural areas compared to urban areas. CONCLUSION: Geographic access to inpatient PEoLC facilities is associated with where people die, with a stronger association seen for patients who lived in rural areas. The findings highlight the need for the formulation of end of life care policies/strategies that consider differences in settlements types. Findings should feed into local end of life policies and strategies of both developed and developing countries to improve equity in health care delivery for those approaching the end of life. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12942-019-0172-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6503436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65034362019-05-10 Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK Chukwusa, Emeka Verne, Julia Polato, Giovanna Taylor, Ros J Higginson, Irene Gao, Wei Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of geographic access to inpatient palliative and end of life care (PEoLC) facilities in place of death and how geographic access varies by settlement (urban and rural). This study aims to fill this evidence gap. METHODS: Individual-level death data in 2014 (N = 430,467, aged 25 +) were extracted from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) death registry and linked to the ONS postcode directory file to derive settlement of the deceased. Drive times from patients’ place of residence to nearest inpatient PEoLC facilities were used as a proxy estimate of geographic access. A modified Poisson regression was used to examine the association between geographic access to PEoLC facilities and place of death, adjusting for patients’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Two models were developed to evaluate the association between geographic access to inpatient PEoLC facilities and place of death. Model 1 compared access to hospice, for hospice deaths versus home deaths, and Model 2 compared access to hospitals, for hospital deaths versus home deaths. The magnitude of association was measured using adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs). RESULTS: We found an inverse association between drive time to hospice and hospice deaths (Model 1), with a dose–response relationship. Patients who lived more than 10 min away from inpatient PEoLC facilities in rural areas (Model 1: APR range 0.49–0.80; Model 2: APR range 0.79–0.98) and urban areas (Model 1: APR range 0.50–0.83; Model 2: APR range 0.98–0.99) were less likely to die there, compared to those who lived closer (i.e. ≤ 10 min drive time). The effects were larger in rural areas compared to urban areas. CONCLUSION: Geographic access to inpatient PEoLC facilities is associated with where people die, with a stronger association seen for patients who lived in rural areas. The findings highlight the need for the formulation of end of life care policies/strategies that consider differences in settlements types. Findings should feed into local end of life policies and strategies of both developed and developing countries to improve equity in health care delivery for those approaching the end of life. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12942-019-0172-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6503436/ /pubmed/31060555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-019-0172-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chukwusa, Emeka
Verne, Julia
Polato, Giovanna
Taylor, Ros
J Higginson, Irene
Gao, Wei
Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK
title Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK
title_full Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK
title_fullStr Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK
title_full_unstemmed Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK
title_short Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in England, UK
title_sort urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (peolc) facilities and place of death: a national population-based study in england, uk
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-019-0172-1
work_keys_str_mv AT chukwusaemeka urbanandruraldifferencesingeographicalaccessibilitytoinpatientpalliativeandendoflifepeolcfacilitiesandplaceofdeathanationalpopulationbasedstudyinenglanduk
AT vernejulia urbanandruraldifferencesingeographicalaccessibilitytoinpatientpalliativeandendoflifepeolcfacilitiesandplaceofdeathanationalpopulationbasedstudyinenglanduk
AT polatogiovanna urbanandruraldifferencesingeographicalaccessibilitytoinpatientpalliativeandendoflifepeolcfacilitiesandplaceofdeathanationalpopulationbasedstudyinenglanduk
AT taylorros urbanandruraldifferencesingeographicalaccessibilitytoinpatientpalliativeandendoflifepeolcfacilitiesandplaceofdeathanationalpopulationbasedstudyinenglanduk
AT jhigginsonirene urbanandruraldifferencesingeographicalaccessibilitytoinpatientpalliativeandendoflifepeolcfacilitiesandplaceofdeathanationalpopulationbasedstudyinenglanduk
AT gaowei urbanandruraldifferencesingeographicalaccessibilitytoinpatientpalliativeandendoflifepeolcfacilitiesandplaceofdeathanationalpopulationbasedstudyinenglanduk