Cargando…
Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Six Different Settings and With Customized Automated Segmentation Software
PURPOSE: We investigate which spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) setting is superior when measuring subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT) and compared results to an automated segmentation software. METHODS: Thirty patients underwent enhanced depth imaging (EDI)-OCT. B-scans were extr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.5 |
_version_ | 1783416484488282112 |
---|---|
author | Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena Huf, Wolfgang Schaal, Karen B. Schürch, Kaspar Dysli, Chantal Dysli, Muriel Zenger, Anita Ceklic, Lala Ciller, Carlos Apostolopoulos, Stephanos De Zanet, Sandro Sznitman, Raphael Ebneter, Andreas Zinkernagel, Martin S. Wolf, Sebastian Munk, Marion R. |
author_facet | Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena Huf, Wolfgang Schaal, Karen B. Schürch, Kaspar Dysli, Chantal Dysli, Muriel Zenger, Anita Ceklic, Lala Ciller, Carlos Apostolopoulos, Stephanos De Zanet, Sandro Sznitman, Raphael Ebneter, Andreas Zinkernagel, Martin S. Wolf, Sebastian Munk, Marion R. |
author_sort | Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We investigate which spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) setting is superior when measuring subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT) and compared results to an automated segmentation software. METHODS: Thirty patients underwent enhanced depth imaging (EDI)-OCT. B-scans were extracted in six different settings (W+N = white background/normal contrast 9; W+H = white background/maximum contrast 16; B+N = black background/normal contrast 12; B+H = black background/maximum contrast 16; C+N = Color-encoded image on black background at predefined contrast of 9, and C+H = Color-encoded image on black background at high/maximal contrast of 16), resulting in 180 images. Subfoveal CT was manually measured by nine graders and by automated segmentation software. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was assessed. RESULTS: ICC was higher in normal than in high contrast images, and better for achromatic black than for white background images. Achromatic images were better than color images. Highest ICC was achieved in B+N (ICC = 0.64), followed by B+H (ICC = 0.54), W+N, and W+H (ICC = 0.5 each). Weakest ICC was obtained with Spectral-color (ICC = 0.47). Mean manual CT versus mean computer estimated CT showed a correlation of r = 0.6 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Black background with white image at normal contrast (B+N) seems the best setting to manually assess subfoveal CT. Automated assessment of CT seems to be a reliable tool for CT assessment. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: To define optimized OCT analysis settings to improve the evaluation of in vivo imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6503890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65038902019-05-20 Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Six Different Settings and With Customized Automated Segmentation Software Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena Huf, Wolfgang Schaal, Karen B. Schürch, Kaspar Dysli, Chantal Dysli, Muriel Zenger, Anita Ceklic, Lala Ciller, Carlos Apostolopoulos, Stephanos De Zanet, Sandro Sznitman, Raphael Ebneter, Andreas Zinkernagel, Martin S. Wolf, Sebastian Munk, Marion R. Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: We investigate which spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) setting is superior when measuring subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT) and compared results to an automated segmentation software. METHODS: Thirty patients underwent enhanced depth imaging (EDI)-OCT. B-scans were extracted in six different settings (W+N = white background/normal contrast 9; W+H = white background/maximum contrast 16; B+N = black background/normal contrast 12; B+H = black background/maximum contrast 16; C+N = Color-encoded image on black background at predefined contrast of 9, and C+H = Color-encoded image on black background at high/maximal contrast of 16), resulting in 180 images. Subfoveal CT was manually measured by nine graders and by automated segmentation software. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was assessed. RESULTS: ICC was higher in normal than in high contrast images, and better for achromatic black than for white background images. Achromatic images were better than color images. Highest ICC was achieved in B+N (ICC = 0.64), followed by B+H (ICC = 0.54), W+N, and W+H (ICC = 0.5 each). Weakest ICC was obtained with Spectral-color (ICC = 0.47). Mean manual CT versus mean computer estimated CT showed a correlation of r = 0.6 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Black background with white image at normal contrast (B+N) seems the best setting to manually assess subfoveal CT. Automated assessment of CT seems to be a reliable tool for CT assessment. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: To define optimized OCT analysis settings to improve the evaluation of in vivo imaging. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6503890/ /pubmed/31110908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.5 Text en Copyright 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Helena Huf, Wolfgang Schaal, Karen B. Schürch, Kaspar Dysli, Chantal Dysli, Muriel Zenger, Anita Ceklic, Lala Ciller, Carlos Apostolopoulos, Stephanos De Zanet, Sandro Sznitman, Raphael Ebneter, Andreas Zinkernagel, Martin S. Wolf, Sebastian Munk, Marion R. Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Six Different Settings and With Customized Automated Segmentation Software |
title | Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Six Different Settings and With Customized Automated Segmentation Software |
title_full | Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Six Different Settings and With Customized Automated Segmentation Software |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Six Different Settings and With Customized Automated Segmentation Software |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Six Different Settings and With Customized Automated Segmentation Software |
title_short | Comparison of Choroidal Thickness Measurements Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Six Different Settings and With Customized Automated Segmentation Software |
title_sort | comparison of choroidal thickness measurements using spectral domain optical coherence tomography in six different settings and with customized automated segmentation software |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giannakakizimmermannhelena comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT hufwolfgang comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT schaalkarenb comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT schurchkaspar comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT dyslichantal comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT dyslimuriel comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT zengeranita comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT cekliclala comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT cillercarlos comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT apostolopoulosstephanos comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT dezanetsandro comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT sznitmanraphael comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT ebneterandreas comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT zinkernagelmartins comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT wolfsebastian comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT munkmarionr comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware AT comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyinsixdifferentsettingsandwithcustomizedautomatedsegmentationsoftware |