Cargando…

Should we provide outreach rehabilitation to very old people living in Nursing Care Facilities after a hip fracture? A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: to determine whether a 4-week postoperative rehabilitation program delivered in Nursing Care Facilities (NCFs) would improve quality of life and mobility compared with receiving usual care. DESIGN: parallel randomised controlled trial with integrated health economic study. SETTING: NCFs,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crotty, Maria, Killington, Maggie, Liu, Enwu, Cameron, Ian D, Kurrle, Susan, Kaambwa, Billingsley, Davies, Owen, Miller, Michelle, Chehade, Mellick, Ratcliffe, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz005
_version_ 1783416490527031296
author Crotty, Maria
Killington, Maggie
Liu, Enwu
Cameron, Ian D
Kurrle, Susan
Kaambwa, Billingsley
Davies, Owen
Miller, Michelle
Chehade, Mellick
Ratcliffe, Julie
author_facet Crotty, Maria
Killington, Maggie
Liu, Enwu
Cameron, Ian D
Kurrle, Susan
Kaambwa, Billingsley
Davies, Owen
Miller, Michelle
Chehade, Mellick
Ratcliffe, Julie
author_sort Crotty, Maria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to determine whether a 4-week postoperative rehabilitation program delivered in Nursing Care Facilities (NCFs) would improve quality of life and mobility compared with receiving usual care. DESIGN: parallel randomised controlled trial with integrated health economic study. SETTING: NCFs, in Adelaide South Australia. SUBJECTS: people aged 70 years and older who were recovering from hip fracture surgery and were walking prior to hip fracture. MEASUREMENTS: primary outcomes: mobility (Nursing Home Life-Space Diameter (NHLSD)) and quality of life (DEMQOL) at 4 weeks and 12 months. RESULTS: participants were randomised to treatment (n = 121) or control (n = 119) groups. At 4 weeks, the treatment group had better mobility (NHLSD mean difference −1.9; 95% CI: −3.3, −0.57; P = 0.0055) and were more likely to be alive (log rank test P = 0.048) but there were no differences in quality of life. At 12 months, the treatment group had better quality of life (DEMQOL sum score mean difference = −7.4; 95% CI: −12.5 to −2.3; P = 0.0051), but there were no other differences between treatment and control groups. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over 12 months were 0.0063 higher per participant (95% CI: −0.0547 to 0.0686). The resulting incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $5,545 Australian dollars per unit increase in the NHLSD (95% CI: $244 to $15,159) and $328,685 per QALY gained (95% CI: $82,654 to $75,007,056). CONCLUSIONS: the benefits did not persist once the rehabilitation program ended but quality of life at 12 months in survivors was slightly higher. The case for funding outreach home rehabilitation in NCFs is weak from a traditional health economic perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12612000112864 registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Trial protocol available at https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id = 361980
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6503935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65039352019-05-09 Should we provide outreach rehabilitation to very old people living in Nursing Care Facilities after a hip fracture? A randomised controlled trial Crotty, Maria Killington, Maggie Liu, Enwu Cameron, Ian D Kurrle, Susan Kaambwa, Billingsley Davies, Owen Miller, Michelle Chehade, Mellick Ratcliffe, Julie Age Ageing Research Paper OBJECTIVE: to determine whether a 4-week postoperative rehabilitation program delivered in Nursing Care Facilities (NCFs) would improve quality of life and mobility compared with receiving usual care. DESIGN: parallel randomised controlled trial with integrated health economic study. SETTING: NCFs, in Adelaide South Australia. SUBJECTS: people aged 70 years and older who were recovering from hip fracture surgery and were walking prior to hip fracture. MEASUREMENTS: primary outcomes: mobility (Nursing Home Life-Space Diameter (NHLSD)) and quality of life (DEMQOL) at 4 weeks and 12 months. RESULTS: participants were randomised to treatment (n = 121) or control (n = 119) groups. At 4 weeks, the treatment group had better mobility (NHLSD mean difference −1.9; 95% CI: −3.3, −0.57; P = 0.0055) and were more likely to be alive (log rank test P = 0.048) but there were no differences in quality of life. At 12 months, the treatment group had better quality of life (DEMQOL sum score mean difference = −7.4; 95% CI: −12.5 to −2.3; P = 0.0051), but there were no other differences between treatment and control groups. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over 12 months were 0.0063 higher per participant (95% CI: −0.0547 to 0.0686). The resulting incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $5,545 Australian dollars per unit increase in the NHLSD (95% CI: $244 to $15,159) and $328,685 per QALY gained (95% CI: $82,654 to $75,007,056). CONCLUSIONS: the benefits did not persist once the rehabilitation program ended but quality of life at 12 months in survivors was slightly higher. The case for funding outreach home rehabilitation in NCFs is weak from a traditional health economic perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12612000112864 registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Trial protocol available at https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id = 361980 Oxford University Press 2019-05 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6503935/ /pubmed/30794284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz005 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Paper
Crotty, Maria
Killington, Maggie
Liu, Enwu
Cameron, Ian D
Kurrle, Susan
Kaambwa, Billingsley
Davies, Owen
Miller, Michelle
Chehade, Mellick
Ratcliffe, Julie
Should we provide outreach rehabilitation to very old people living in Nursing Care Facilities after a hip fracture? A randomised controlled trial
title Should we provide outreach rehabilitation to very old people living in Nursing Care Facilities after a hip fracture? A randomised controlled trial
title_full Should we provide outreach rehabilitation to very old people living in Nursing Care Facilities after a hip fracture? A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Should we provide outreach rehabilitation to very old people living in Nursing Care Facilities after a hip fracture? A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Should we provide outreach rehabilitation to very old people living in Nursing Care Facilities after a hip fracture? A randomised controlled trial
title_short Should we provide outreach rehabilitation to very old people living in Nursing Care Facilities after a hip fracture? A randomised controlled trial
title_sort should we provide outreach rehabilitation to very old people living in nursing care facilities after a hip fracture? a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6503935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz005
work_keys_str_mv AT crottymaria shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT killingtonmaggie shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT liuenwu shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cameroniand shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kurrlesusan shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kaambwabillingsley shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daviesowen shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT millermichelle shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chehademellick shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ratcliffejulie shouldweprovideoutreachrehabilitationtoveryoldpeoplelivinginnursingcarefacilitiesafterahipfracturearandomisedcontrolledtrial