Cargando…

The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The optimal securement method of endotracheal tubes is unknown but should prevent dislodgement while minimizing complications. The use of an endotracheal tube fastener might reduce complications among critically ill adults undergoing endotracheal intubation. METHODS: In this pragmatic, s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landsperger, Janna S., Byram, Jesse M., Lloyd, Bradley D., Rice, Todd W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31064406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2440-7
_version_ 1783416695346429952
author Landsperger, Janna S.
Byram, Jesse M.
Lloyd, Bradley D.
Rice, Todd W.
author_facet Landsperger, Janna S.
Byram, Jesse M.
Lloyd, Bradley D.
Rice, Todd W.
author_sort Landsperger, Janna S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal securement method of endotracheal tubes is unknown but should prevent dislodgement while minimizing complications. The use of an endotracheal tube fastener might reduce complications among critically ill adults undergoing endotracheal intubation. METHODS: In this pragmatic, single-center, randomized trial, critically ill adults admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and expected to require invasive mechanical ventilation for greater than 24 h were randomized to adhesive tape or endotracheal tube fastener at the time of intubation. The primary endpoint was a composite of any of the following: presence of lip ulcer, endotracheal tube dislodgement (defined as moving at least 2 cm), ventilator-associated pneumonia, or facial skin tears anytime between randomization and the earlier of death or 48 h after extubation. Secondary endpoints included duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 500 patients randomized over a 12-month period, 162 had a duration of mechanical ventilation less than 24 h and 40 had missing outcome data, leaving 153 evaluable patients randomized to tube fastener and 145 evaluable patients randomized to adhesive tape. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The primary endpoint occurred 13 times in 12 (7.8%) patients in the tube fastener group and 30 times in 25 (17.2%) patients in the adhesive tape group (p = 0.014) for an overall incidence of 22.0 versus 52.6 per 1000 ventilator days, respectively (p = 0.020). Lip ulcers occurred in 4 (2.6%) versus 11 (7.3%) patients, or an incidence rate of 6.5 versus 19.5 per 1000 patient ventilator days (p = 0.053) in the fastener and tape groups, respectively. The endotracheal tube was dislodged 7 times in 6 (3.9%) patients in the tube fastener group and 16 times in 15 (10.3%) patients in the tape group (p = 0.03), reflecting incidences of 11.9 and 28.1 per 1000 ventilator days, respectively. Facial skin tears were similar between the groups. Mechanical ventilation duration and ICU and hospital mortality did not differ. CONCLUSION: The use of the endotracheal tube fastener to secure the endotracheal tubes reduces the rate of a composite outcome that included lip ulcers, facial skin tears, or endotracheal tube dislodgement compared to adhesive tape. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03760510. Retrospectively registered on November 30, 2018
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6505126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65051262019-05-10 The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial Landsperger, Janna S. Byram, Jesse M. Lloyd, Bradley D. Rice, Todd W. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: The optimal securement method of endotracheal tubes is unknown but should prevent dislodgement while minimizing complications. The use of an endotracheal tube fastener might reduce complications among critically ill adults undergoing endotracheal intubation. METHODS: In this pragmatic, single-center, randomized trial, critically ill adults admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and expected to require invasive mechanical ventilation for greater than 24 h were randomized to adhesive tape or endotracheal tube fastener at the time of intubation. The primary endpoint was a composite of any of the following: presence of lip ulcer, endotracheal tube dislodgement (defined as moving at least 2 cm), ventilator-associated pneumonia, or facial skin tears anytime between randomization and the earlier of death or 48 h after extubation. Secondary endpoints included duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 500 patients randomized over a 12-month period, 162 had a duration of mechanical ventilation less than 24 h and 40 had missing outcome data, leaving 153 evaluable patients randomized to tube fastener and 145 evaluable patients randomized to adhesive tape. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The primary endpoint occurred 13 times in 12 (7.8%) patients in the tube fastener group and 30 times in 25 (17.2%) patients in the adhesive tape group (p = 0.014) for an overall incidence of 22.0 versus 52.6 per 1000 ventilator days, respectively (p = 0.020). Lip ulcers occurred in 4 (2.6%) versus 11 (7.3%) patients, or an incidence rate of 6.5 versus 19.5 per 1000 patient ventilator days (p = 0.053) in the fastener and tape groups, respectively. The endotracheal tube was dislodged 7 times in 6 (3.9%) patients in the tube fastener group and 16 times in 15 (10.3%) patients in the tape group (p = 0.03), reflecting incidences of 11.9 and 28.1 per 1000 ventilator days, respectively. Facial skin tears were similar between the groups. Mechanical ventilation duration and ICU and hospital mortality did not differ. CONCLUSION: The use of the endotracheal tube fastener to secure the endotracheal tubes reduces the rate of a composite outcome that included lip ulcers, facial skin tears, or endotracheal tube dislodgement compared to adhesive tape. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03760510. Retrospectively registered on November 30, 2018 BioMed Central 2019-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6505126/ /pubmed/31064406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2440-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Landsperger, Janna S.
Byram, Jesse M.
Lloyd, Bradley D.
Rice, Todd W.
The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial
title The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial
title_full The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial
title_short The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (etts) randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31064406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2440-7
work_keys_str_mv AT landspergerjannas theeffectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT byramjessem theeffectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lloydbradleyd theeffectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ricetoddw theeffectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT theeffectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT landspergerjannas effectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT byramjessem effectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lloydbradleyd effectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ricetoddw effectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT effectofadhesivetapeversusendotrachealtubefastenerincriticallyilladultstheendotrachealtubesecurementettsrandomizedcontrolledtrial