Cargando…

Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya

BACKGROUND: Universal health coverage (UHC) is growing as a national political priority, within the context of recently devolved decision-making processes in Kenya. Increasingly voices within these discussions are highlighting the need for actions towards UHC to focus on quality of services, as well...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCollum, Rosalind, Taegtmeyer, Miriam, Otiso, Lilian, Mireku, Maryline, Muturi, Nelly, Martineau, Tim, Theobald, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31064355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0967-5
_version_ 1783416730184318976
author McCollum, Rosalind
Taegtmeyer, Miriam
Otiso, Lilian
Mireku, Maryline
Muturi, Nelly
Martineau, Tim
Theobald, Sally
author_facet McCollum, Rosalind
Taegtmeyer, Miriam
Otiso, Lilian
Mireku, Maryline
Muturi, Nelly
Martineau, Tim
Theobald, Sally
author_sort McCollum, Rosalind
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Universal health coverage (UHC) is growing as a national political priority, within the context of recently devolved decision-making processes in Kenya. Increasingly voices within these discussions are highlighting the need for actions towards UHC to focus on quality of services, as well as improving coverage through expansion of national health insurance fund (NHIF) enrolment. Improving health equity is one of the most frequently described objectives for devolution of health services. Previous studies, however, highlight the complexity and unpredictability of devolution processes, potentially contributing to widening rather than reducing disparities. Our study applied Tanahashi’s equity model (according to availability, accessibility, acceptability, contact with and quality) to review perceived equity of health services by actors across the health system and at community level, following changes to the priority-setting process at sub-national levels post devolution in Kenya. METHODS: We carried out a qualitative study between March 2015 and April 2016, involving 269 key informant and in-depth interviews from different levels of the health system in ten counties and 14 focus group discussions with community members in two of these counties. Qualitative data were analysed using the framework approach. RESULTS: Our findings reveal that devolution in Kenya has focused on improving the supply side of health services, by expanding the availability, geographic and financial accessibility of health services across many counties. However, there has been limited emphasis and investment in promoting the demand side, including restricted efforts to promote acceptability or use of services. Respondents perceived that the quality of health services has typically been neglected within priority-setting to date. CONCLUSIONS: If Kenya is to achieve universal health coverage for all citizens, then county governments must address all aspects of equity, including quality. Through application of the Tanahashi framework, we find that community health services can play a crucial role towards achieving health equity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6505258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65052582019-05-10 Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya McCollum, Rosalind Taegtmeyer, Miriam Otiso, Lilian Mireku, Maryline Muturi, Nelly Martineau, Tim Theobald, Sally Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Universal health coverage (UHC) is growing as a national political priority, within the context of recently devolved decision-making processes in Kenya. Increasingly voices within these discussions are highlighting the need for actions towards UHC to focus on quality of services, as well as improving coverage through expansion of national health insurance fund (NHIF) enrolment. Improving health equity is one of the most frequently described objectives for devolution of health services. Previous studies, however, highlight the complexity and unpredictability of devolution processes, potentially contributing to widening rather than reducing disparities. Our study applied Tanahashi’s equity model (according to availability, accessibility, acceptability, contact with and quality) to review perceived equity of health services by actors across the health system and at community level, following changes to the priority-setting process at sub-national levels post devolution in Kenya. METHODS: We carried out a qualitative study between March 2015 and April 2016, involving 269 key informant and in-depth interviews from different levels of the health system in ten counties and 14 focus group discussions with community members in two of these counties. Qualitative data were analysed using the framework approach. RESULTS: Our findings reveal that devolution in Kenya has focused on improving the supply side of health services, by expanding the availability, geographic and financial accessibility of health services across many counties. However, there has been limited emphasis and investment in promoting the demand side, including restricted efforts to promote acceptability or use of services. Respondents perceived that the quality of health services has typically been neglected within priority-setting to date. CONCLUSIONS: If Kenya is to achieve universal health coverage for all citizens, then county governments must address all aspects of equity, including quality. Through application of the Tanahashi framework, we find that community health services can play a crucial role towards achieving health equity. BioMed Central 2019-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6505258/ /pubmed/31064355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0967-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
McCollum, Rosalind
Taegtmeyer, Miriam
Otiso, Lilian
Mireku, Maryline
Muturi, Nelly
Martineau, Tim
Theobald, Sally
Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya
title Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya
title_full Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya
title_fullStr Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya
title_short Healthcare equity analysis: applying the Tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in Kenya
title_sort healthcare equity analysis: applying the tanahashi model of health service coverage to community health systems following devolution in kenya
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31064355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0967-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mccollumrosalind healthcareequityanalysisapplyingthetanahashimodelofhealthservicecoveragetocommunityhealthsystemsfollowingdevolutioninkenya
AT taegtmeyermiriam healthcareequityanalysisapplyingthetanahashimodelofhealthservicecoveragetocommunityhealthsystemsfollowingdevolutioninkenya
AT otisolilian healthcareequityanalysisapplyingthetanahashimodelofhealthservicecoveragetocommunityhealthsystemsfollowingdevolutioninkenya
AT mirekumaryline healthcareequityanalysisapplyingthetanahashimodelofhealthservicecoveragetocommunityhealthsystemsfollowingdevolutioninkenya
AT muturinelly healthcareequityanalysisapplyingthetanahashimodelofhealthservicecoveragetocommunityhealthsystemsfollowingdevolutioninkenya
AT martineautim healthcareequityanalysisapplyingthetanahashimodelofhealthservicecoveragetocommunityhealthsystemsfollowingdevolutioninkenya
AT theobaldsally healthcareequityanalysisapplyingthetanahashimodelofhealthservicecoveragetocommunityhealthsystemsfollowingdevolutioninkenya