Cargando…

“Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit

BACKGROUND: The Stoptober temporary abstinence campaign challenges smokers to engage in a collective quit attempt for 28 days. The campaign is based on social contagion theory, SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-sensitive) goal setting and PRIME (i.e., Plans, Responses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Troelstra, Sigrid A., Kunst, Anton E., Harting, Janneke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31064349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6833-y
_version_ 1783416743334510592
author Troelstra, Sigrid A.
Kunst, Anton E.
Harting, Janneke
author_facet Troelstra, Sigrid A.
Kunst, Anton E.
Harting, Janneke
author_sort Troelstra, Sigrid A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Stoptober temporary abstinence campaign challenges smokers to engage in a collective quit attempt for 28 days. The campaign is based on social contagion theory, SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-sensitive) goal setting and PRIME (i.e., Plans, Responses, Impulses, Motives and Evaluations) theory. Although Stoptober was found to yield impressive 28-day quit rates, relapse rates remained substantial. Therefore, we examined how Stoptober supported smokers in their attempt to quit and how the campaign’s effectiveness could be strengthened. METHODS: In 2016, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 Stoptober participants in the Netherlands. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Respondents explained how social contagion-based components had familiarized them with Stoptober, motivated them to participate, and created a pro-smoking cessation social norm. Setting SMART goals was reported as “fooling yourself”, since it distracted respondents from their goal of quitting for good and helped them perceive that temporary abstinence was achievable. Respondents also illustrated the usefulness of PRIME theory. They typically used an individual selection of available supports that varied over time. To achieve long-term abstinence, respondents expressed the need for additional social network support and interactive, personalized and professional support during and after the campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Stoptober supports smokers in their attempts to quit and generally according to the campaign’s theoretical principles. Added to available evidence, this finding supports the continuation and wider implementation of Stoptober, while connecting the campaign to social networks and regular smoking-cessation services to help improve long-term abstinence rates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6833-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6505303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65053032019-05-10 “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit Troelstra, Sigrid A. Kunst, Anton E. Harting, Janneke BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The Stoptober temporary abstinence campaign challenges smokers to engage in a collective quit attempt for 28 days. The campaign is based on social contagion theory, SMART (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time-sensitive) goal setting and PRIME (i.e., Plans, Responses, Impulses, Motives and Evaluations) theory. Although Stoptober was found to yield impressive 28-day quit rates, relapse rates remained substantial. Therefore, we examined how Stoptober supported smokers in their attempt to quit and how the campaign’s effectiveness could be strengthened. METHODS: In 2016, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 Stoptober participants in the Netherlands. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Respondents explained how social contagion-based components had familiarized them with Stoptober, motivated them to participate, and created a pro-smoking cessation social norm. Setting SMART goals was reported as “fooling yourself”, since it distracted respondents from their goal of quitting for good and helped them perceive that temporary abstinence was achievable. Respondents also illustrated the usefulness of PRIME theory. They typically used an individual selection of available supports that varied over time. To achieve long-term abstinence, respondents expressed the need for additional social network support and interactive, personalized and professional support during and after the campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Stoptober supports smokers in their attempts to quit and generally according to the campaign’s theoretical principles. Added to available evidence, this finding supports the continuation and wider implementation of Stoptober, while connecting the campaign to social networks and regular smoking-cessation services to help improve long-term abstinence rates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6833-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6505303/ /pubmed/31064349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6833-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Troelstra, Sigrid A.
Kunst, Anton E.
Harting, Janneke
“Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_full “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_fullStr “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_full_unstemmed “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_short “Like you are fooling yourself”: how the “Stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports Dutch smokers attempting to quit
title_sort “like you are fooling yourself”: how the “stoptober” temporary abstinence campaign supports dutch smokers attempting to quit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31064349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6833-y
work_keys_str_mv AT troelstrasigrida likeyouarefoolingyourselfhowthestoptobertemporaryabstinencecampaignsupportsdutchsmokersattemptingtoquit
AT kunstantone likeyouarefoolingyourselfhowthestoptobertemporaryabstinencecampaignsupportsdutchsmokersattemptingtoquit
AT hartingjanneke likeyouarefoolingyourselfhowthestoptobertemporaryabstinencecampaignsupportsdutchsmokersattemptingtoquit