Cargando…
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Skin Rash Prophylaxis in a Community Oncology Setting
Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs) can potentially cause a debilitating rash despite use of reactive-based treatment. Prophylactic rash management is a controversial rash-mitigating approach. The impact of a prophylactic rash treatment protocol for EGFRIs at a community hospital wa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Harborside Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086685 |
_version_ | 1783416779420205056 |
---|---|
author | Pepper, Micah S. May, Megan |
author_facet | Pepper, Micah S. May, Megan |
author_sort | Pepper, Micah S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs) can potentially cause a debilitating rash despite use of reactive-based treatment. Prophylactic rash management is a controversial rash-mitigating approach. The impact of a prophylactic rash treatment protocol for EGFRIs at a community hospital was evaluated. This was a retrospective, institutional review board–approved examination of patient data for those patients who received EGFRIs from August 1, 2012, through May 31, 2015. Patients were grouped according to treatment with EGFRIs prior to standardized prophylactic rash management protocol (August 1, 2012, through July 31, 2014) and treatment after protocol implementation (September 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015). The outcomes measured included incidence of rash within the 6-week treatment period and occurrence of EGFRI dose reductions and/or delays. Of the 44 patients eligible for the analysis, 29 were evaluated in the reactive treatment group and 15 in the rash prophylaxis group. The incidence of rash over the 6-week EGFRI treatment period was 76% and 47% for the reactive treatment and rash prophylaxis groups, respectively (p = .09). There was a lower incidence of EGFRI dose delays and modifications in the rash prophylaxis group compared to the reactive treatment group: 26.7% and 6.7% compared to 41.4% and 20.7%, respectively. There was an overall decrease in rash incidence seen in patients who received prophylactic intervention; however, due to the failure to meet statistical significance and power, it is not possible to determine if rash prophylaxis decreases EGFRI rash incidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6505548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Harborside Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65055482019-05-13 Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Skin Rash Prophylaxis in a Community Oncology Setting Pepper, Micah S. May, Megan J Adv Pract Oncol Review Article Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs) can potentially cause a debilitating rash despite use of reactive-based treatment. Prophylactic rash management is a controversial rash-mitigating approach. The impact of a prophylactic rash treatment protocol for EGFRIs at a community hospital was evaluated. This was a retrospective, institutional review board–approved examination of patient data for those patients who received EGFRIs from August 1, 2012, through May 31, 2015. Patients were grouped according to treatment with EGFRIs prior to standardized prophylactic rash management protocol (August 1, 2012, through July 31, 2014) and treatment after protocol implementation (September 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015). The outcomes measured included incidence of rash within the 6-week treatment period and occurrence of EGFRI dose reductions and/or delays. Of the 44 patients eligible for the analysis, 29 were evaluated in the reactive treatment group and 15 in the rash prophylaxis group. The incidence of rash over the 6-week EGFRI treatment period was 76% and 47% for the reactive treatment and rash prophylaxis groups, respectively (p = .09). There was a lower incidence of EGFRI dose delays and modifications in the rash prophylaxis group compared to the reactive treatment group: 26.7% and 6.7% compared to 41.4% and 20.7%, respectively. There was an overall decrease in rash incidence seen in patients who received prophylactic intervention; however, due to the failure to meet statistical significance and power, it is not possible to determine if rash prophylaxis decreases EGFRI rash incidence. Harborside Press 2018 2018-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6505548/ /pubmed/31086685 Text en Copyright © 2018, Harborside Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Pepper, Micah S. May, Megan Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Skin Rash Prophylaxis in a Community Oncology Setting |
title | Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Skin Rash Prophylaxis in a Community Oncology Setting |
title_full | Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Skin Rash Prophylaxis in a Community Oncology Setting |
title_fullStr | Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Skin Rash Prophylaxis in a Community Oncology Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Skin Rash Prophylaxis in a Community Oncology Setting |
title_short | Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Skin Rash Prophylaxis in a Community Oncology Setting |
title_sort | epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor skin rash prophylaxis in a community oncology setting |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peppermicahs epidermalgrowthfactorreceptorinhibitorskinrashprophylaxisinacommunityoncologysetting AT maymegan epidermalgrowthfactorreceptorinhibitorskinrashprophylaxisinacommunityoncologysetting |