Cargando…

Women’s views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation

The scientific and ethical importance of including women of reproductive age in biomedical research is widely acknowledged. Concerns about preventing fetal exposure to research interventions have motivated requirements for contraception among reproductive aged women in biomedical studies–often irres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sullivan, Kristen A., Little, Margaret Olivia, Rosenberg, Nora E., Zimba, Chifundo, Jaffe, Elana, Gilbert, Sappho, Coleman, Jenell S., Hoffman, Irving, Mtande, Tiwonge, Anderson, Jean, Gross, Marielle S., Rahangdale, Lisa, Faden, Ruth, Lyerly, Anne Drapkin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31067273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216332
_version_ 1783416821159821312
author Sullivan, Kristen A.
Little, Margaret Olivia
Rosenberg, Nora E.
Zimba, Chifundo
Jaffe, Elana
Gilbert, Sappho
Coleman, Jenell S.
Hoffman, Irving
Mtande, Tiwonge
Anderson, Jean
Gross, Marielle S.
Rahangdale, Lisa
Faden, Ruth
Lyerly, Anne Drapkin
author_facet Sullivan, Kristen A.
Little, Margaret Olivia
Rosenberg, Nora E.
Zimba, Chifundo
Jaffe, Elana
Gilbert, Sappho
Coleman, Jenell S.
Hoffman, Irving
Mtande, Tiwonge
Anderson, Jean
Gross, Marielle S.
Rahangdale, Lisa
Faden, Ruth
Lyerly, Anne Drapkin
author_sort Sullivan, Kristen A.
collection PubMed
description The scientific and ethical importance of including women of reproductive age in biomedical research is widely acknowledged. Concerns about preventing fetal exposure to research interventions have motivated requirements for contraception among reproductive aged women in biomedical studies–often irrespective of risks and benefits or a woman’s actual potential for pregnancy, raising important questions about when such requirements are appropriate. The perspectives of women themselves on these issues are largely unexplored. We conducted 140 interviews, 70 in the U.S. and 70 in Malawi, with women either living with or at-risk for HIV, exploring their views about the practice of requiring contraception in clinical trials. A majority of women interviewed from both countries indicated overall support for the practice, with seven themes characterizing advantages and disadvantages raised: reproductive control, health effects, prevention of fetal harm, burden on women, deferral to authority, autonomy regarding enrollment and birth control method, and relationship concerns. While women in the US frequently raised prevention of fetal harm as a key advantage, many other positives noted by women in both countries were related to contraception use in general, not specific to a trial context. With regard to disadvantages, U.S. women tended to focus on biomedical risks such as side effects and impact on fertility, whereas Malawian women focused on the social risks of contraception requirements, including violations of trust in marital relations and suspicions of potential infidelity. Given the potential benefits and burdens highlighted, contraception in research should be sensitive to actual fetal risk assessments; directed where justified at optimizing effective pregnancy prevention; responsive to women’s reproductive preferences; and made available as an ancillary benefit even where risk thresholds do not justify requirement–in order to facilitate trials that are both ethical and robustly oriented around the interests and lives of women who will participate in them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6505940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65059402019-05-23 Women’s views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation Sullivan, Kristen A. Little, Margaret Olivia Rosenberg, Nora E. Zimba, Chifundo Jaffe, Elana Gilbert, Sappho Coleman, Jenell S. Hoffman, Irving Mtande, Tiwonge Anderson, Jean Gross, Marielle S. Rahangdale, Lisa Faden, Ruth Lyerly, Anne Drapkin PLoS One Research Article The scientific and ethical importance of including women of reproductive age in biomedical research is widely acknowledged. Concerns about preventing fetal exposure to research interventions have motivated requirements for contraception among reproductive aged women in biomedical studies–often irrespective of risks and benefits or a woman’s actual potential for pregnancy, raising important questions about when such requirements are appropriate. The perspectives of women themselves on these issues are largely unexplored. We conducted 140 interviews, 70 in the U.S. and 70 in Malawi, with women either living with or at-risk for HIV, exploring their views about the practice of requiring contraception in clinical trials. A majority of women interviewed from both countries indicated overall support for the practice, with seven themes characterizing advantages and disadvantages raised: reproductive control, health effects, prevention of fetal harm, burden on women, deferral to authority, autonomy regarding enrollment and birth control method, and relationship concerns. While women in the US frequently raised prevention of fetal harm as a key advantage, many other positives noted by women in both countries were related to contraception use in general, not specific to a trial context. With regard to disadvantages, U.S. women tended to focus on biomedical risks such as side effects and impact on fertility, whereas Malawian women focused on the social risks of contraception requirements, including violations of trust in marital relations and suspicions of potential infidelity. Given the potential benefits and burdens highlighted, contraception in research should be sensitive to actual fetal risk assessments; directed where justified at optimizing effective pregnancy prevention; responsive to women’s reproductive preferences; and made available as an ancillary benefit even where risk thresholds do not justify requirement–in order to facilitate trials that are both ethical and robustly oriented around the interests and lives of women who will participate in them. Public Library of Science 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6505940/ /pubmed/31067273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216332 Text en © 2019 Sullivan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sullivan, Kristen A.
Little, Margaret Olivia
Rosenberg, Nora E.
Zimba, Chifundo
Jaffe, Elana
Gilbert, Sappho
Coleman, Jenell S.
Hoffman, Irving
Mtande, Tiwonge
Anderson, Jean
Gross, Marielle S.
Rahangdale, Lisa
Faden, Ruth
Lyerly, Anne Drapkin
Women’s views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation
title Women’s views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation
title_full Women’s views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation
title_fullStr Women’s views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation
title_full_unstemmed Women’s views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation
title_short Women’s views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation
title_sort women’s views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31067273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216332
work_keys_str_mv AT sullivankristena womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT littlemargaretolivia womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT rosenbergnorae womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT zimbachifundo womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT jaffeelana womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT gilbertsappho womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT colemanjenells womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT hoffmanirving womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT mtandetiwonge womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT andersonjean womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT grossmarielles womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT rahangdalelisa womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT fadenruth womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation
AT lyerlyannedrapkin womensviewsaboutcontraceptionrequirementsforbiomedicalresearchparticipation