Cargando…

What matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: A qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Reducing deaths from PPH is a global challenge. The voices of women and healthcare providers have been missing from the debate around best practices for PPH prevention. The aim of this review was to iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finlayson, Kenneth, Downe, Soo, Vogel, Joshua P., Oladapo, Olufemi T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31067245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215919
_version_ 1783416821655797760
author Finlayson, Kenneth
Downe, Soo
Vogel, Joshua P.
Oladapo, Olufemi T.
author_facet Finlayson, Kenneth
Downe, Soo
Vogel, Joshua P.
Oladapo, Olufemi T.
author_sort Finlayson, Kenneth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Reducing deaths from PPH is a global challenge. The voices of women and healthcare providers have been missing from the debate around best practices for PPH prevention. The aim of this review was to identify, appraise and synthesize available evidence about the views and experiences of women and healthcare providers on interventions to prevent PPH. METHODS: We searched eight electronic databases and reference lists of eligible studies published between 1996 and 2018, reporting qualitative data on views and experiences of PPH in general, and of any specific preventative intervention(s). Authors’ findings were extracted and synthesised using meta-ethnographic techniques. Confidence in the quality, coherence, relevance and adequacy of data underpinning the resulting themes was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. A line of argument synthesis was developed. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies from 29 countries met our inclusion criteria. Our results indicate that women and healthcare providers recognise the dangers of severe blood loss in the perinatal and postpartum period, but don’t always share the same beliefs about the causes and consequences of PPH. Skilled birth attendants and traditional birth attendants (TBA’s) want to prevent PPH but may lack the required resources and training. Women generally appreciate PPH prevention strategies, especially where their individual needs, beliefs and values are taken into account. Women and healthcare providers also recognize the value of using uterotonics (medications that contract the uterus) to prevent PPH but highlight safety concerns and potential misuse of the drugs as acceptability and implementation issues. CONCLUSIONS: Based on stakeholder views and experiences, PPH prevention strategies are more likely to be successful where all stakeholders agree on the causes and consequences of severe postpartum blood loss, especially in the context of sufficient resources and effective implementation by competent, suitably trained providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6505942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65059422019-05-23 What matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: A qualitative systematic review Finlayson, Kenneth Downe, Soo Vogel, Joshua P. Oladapo, Olufemi T. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Reducing deaths from PPH is a global challenge. The voices of women and healthcare providers have been missing from the debate around best practices for PPH prevention. The aim of this review was to identify, appraise and synthesize available evidence about the views and experiences of women and healthcare providers on interventions to prevent PPH. METHODS: We searched eight electronic databases and reference lists of eligible studies published between 1996 and 2018, reporting qualitative data on views and experiences of PPH in general, and of any specific preventative intervention(s). Authors’ findings were extracted and synthesised using meta-ethnographic techniques. Confidence in the quality, coherence, relevance and adequacy of data underpinning the resulting themes was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. A line of argument synthesis was developed. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies from 29 countries met our inclusion criteria. Our results indicate that women and healthcare providers recognise the dangers of severe blood loss in the perinatal and postpartum period, but don’t always share the same beliefs about the causes and consequences of PPH. Skilled birth attendants and traditional birth attendants (TBA’s) want to prevent PPH but may lack the required resources and training. Women generally appreciate PPH prevention strategies, especially where their individual needs, beliefs and values are taken into account. Women and healthcare providers also recognize the value of using uterotonics (medications that contract the uterus) to prevent PPH but highlight safety concerns and potential misuse of the drugs as acceptability and implementation issues. CONCLUSIONS: Based on stakeholder views and experiences, PPH prevention strategies are more likely to be successful where all stakeholders agree on the causes and consequences of severe postpartum blood loss, especially in the context of sufficient resources and effective implementation by competent, suitably trained providers. Public Library of Science 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6505942/ /pubmed/31067245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215919 Text en © 2019 Finlayson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Finlayson, Kenneth
Downe, Soo
Vogel, Joshua P.
Oladapo, Olufemi T.
What matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: A qualitative systematic review
title What matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: A qualitative systematic review
title_full What matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: A qualitative systematic review
title_fullStr What matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: A qualitative systematic review
title_full_unstemmed What matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: A qualitative systematic review
title_short What matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: A qualitative systematic review
title_sort what matters to women and healthcare providers in relation to interventions for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6505942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31067245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215919
work_keys_str_mv AT finlaysonkenneth whatmatterstowomenandhealthcareprovidersinrelationtointerventionsforthepreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaqualitativesystematicreview
AT downesoo whatmatterstowomenandhealthcareprovidersinrelationtointerventionsforthepreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaqualitativesystematicreview
AT vogeljoshuap whatmatterstowomenandhealthcareprovidersinrelationtointerventionsforthepreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaqualitativesystematicreview
AT oladapoolufemit whatmatterstowomenandhealthcareprovidersinrelationtointerventionsforthepreventionofpostpartumhaemorrhageaqualitativesystematicreview