Cargando…

Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity

BACKGROUND: The overall effectiveness of aspiration therapy (AT) for obesity relies on optimal aspiration timing after a meal, which can vary depending on a patient’s rate of gastric emptying (GE). Our aim was to identify if baseline GE rates were associated with differences in aspiration efficiency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vargas, Eric J, Storm, Andrew C, Bazerbachi, Fateh, Abu Dayyeh, Barham K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000273
_version_ 1783416832079691776
author Vargas, Eric J
Storm, Andrew C
Bazerbachi, Fateh
Abu Dayyeh, Barham K
author_facet Vargas, Eric J
Storm, Andrew C
Bazerbachi, Fateh
Abu Dayyeh, Barham K
author_sort Vargas, Eric J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The overall effectiveness of aspiration therapy (AT) for obesity relies on optimal aspiration timing after a meal, which can vary depending on a patient’s rate of gastric emptying (GE). Our aim was to identify if baseline GE rates were associated with differences in aspiration efficiency (AE). METHODS: Subjects from an ongoing AT clinical trial were enrolled in this study. AE was calculated as the absolute gastric residual and calories aspirated at 20 and 40 min. Participants were then divided by baseline GE rate into two groups (slow vs fast). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare AE at 20 and 40 min between the groups. Exploratory linear regression was used to assess relationship between GE and AE. RESULTS: 7 patients (85% female) were coenrolled in the study. Mean age and body mass index were 39.8±9.44 and 43±5, respectively. AE did not significantly differ between the 20 and 40 min time points for the group as a whole (34.3% vs 36.9%; p>0.5). However, those with fast GE aspirated more calories than those with slow GE (20 min: 200 kcal vs 72.5 kcal; 40 min: 154 kcal vs 63 kcal) (p=0.05). On linear regression, delayed GE was associated with poorer aspiration (20 min: β=−107 calories; p=0.019; R(2)=0.7). 4/7 patients had significant differences in residual/caloric aspiration across the two time points. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing AT may benefit from a GE test to optimise their AE. Paradoxically faster GE times saw better aspiration. Prospective studies are revealing a personalised approach to obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6506129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65061292019-05-28 Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity Vargas, Eric J Storm, Andrew C Bazerbachi, Fateh Abu Dayyeh, Barham K BMJ Open Gastroenterol Endoscopy BACKGROUND: The overall effectiveness of aspiration therapy (AT) for obesity relies on optimal aspiration timing after a meal, which can vary depending on a patient’s rate of gastric emptying (GE). Our aim was to identify if baseline GE rates were associated with differences in aspiration efficiency (AE). METHODS: Subjects from an ongoing AT clinical trial were enrolled in this study. AE was calculated as the absolute gastric residual and calories aspirated at 20 and 40 min. Participants were then divided by baseline GE rate into two groups (slow vs fast). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare AE at 20 and 40 min between the groups. Exploratory linear regression was used to assess relationship between GE and AE. RESULTS: 7 patients (85% female) were coenrolled in the study. Mean age and body mass index were 39.8±9.44 and 43±5, respectively. AE did not significantly differ between the 20 and 40 min time points for the group as a whole (34.3% vs 36.9%; p>0.5). However, those with fast GE aspirated more calories than those with slow GE (20 min: 200 kcal vs 72.5 kcal; 40 min: 154 kcal vs 63 kcal) (p=0.05). On linear regression, delayed GE was associated with poorer aspiration (20 min: β=−107 calories; p=0.019; R(2)=0.7). 4/7 patients had significant differences in residual/caloric aspiration across the two time points. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing AT may benefit from a GE test to optimise their AE. Paradoxically faster GE times saw better aspiration. Prospective studies are revealing a personalised approach to obesity. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6506129/ /pubmed/31139425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000273 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Endoscopy
Vargas, Eric J
Storm, Andrew C
Bazerbachi, Fateh
Abu Dayyeh, Barham K
Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_full Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_fullStr Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_full_unstemmed Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_short Accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
title_sort accelerated gastric emptying is associated with improved aspiration efficiency in obesity
topic Endoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000273
work_keys_str_mv AT vargasericj acceleratedgastricemptyingisassociatedwithimprovedaspirationefficiencyinobesity
AT stormandrewc acceleratedgastricemptyingisassociatedwithimprovedaspirationefficiencyinobesity
AT bazerbachifateh acceleratedgastricemptyingisassociatedwithimprovedaspirationefficiencyinobesity
AT abudayyehbarhamk acceleratedgastricemptyingisassociatedwithimprovedaspirationefficiencyinobesity