Cargando…
Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa
The subsistence of Neolithic populations is based on agriculture, whereas that of previous populations was based on hunting and gathering. Neolithic spreads due to dispersal of populations are called demic, and those due to the incorporation of hunter-gatherers are called cultural. It is well-known...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31067220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215573 |
_version_ | 1783416832801112064 |
---|---|
author | Isern, Neus Fort, Joaquim |
author_facet | Isern, Neus Fort, Joaquim |
author_sort | Isern, Neus |
collection | PubMed |
description | The subsistence of Neolithic populations is based on agriculture, whereas that of previous populations was based on hunting and gathering. Neolithic spreads due to dispersal of populations are called demic, and those due to the incorporation of hunter-gatherers are called cultural. It is well-known that, after agriculture appeared in West Africa, it spread across most of subequatorial Africa. It has been proposed that this spread took place alongside with that of Bantu languages. In eastern and southeastern Africa, it is also linked to the Early Iron Age. From the beginning of the last millennium BC, cereal agriculture spread rapidly from the Great Lakes area eastwards to the East African coast, and southwards to northeastern South Africa. Here we show that the southwards spread took place substantially more rapidly (1.50–2.27 km/y) than the eastwards spread (0.59–1.27 km/y). Such a faster southwards spread could be the result of a stronger cultural effect. To assess this possibility, we compare these observed ranges to those obtained from a demic-cultural wave-of-advance model. We find that both spreads were driven by demic diffusion, in agreement with most archaeological, linguistic and genetic results. Nonetheless, the southwards spread seems to have indeed a stronger cultural component, which could lead support to the hypothesis that, at the southern areas, the interaction with pastoralist people may have played a significant role. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6506142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65061422019-05-23 Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa Isern, Neus Fort, Joaquim PLoS One Research Article The subsistence of Neolithic populations is based on agriculture, whereas that of previous populations was based on hunting and gathering. Neolithic spreads due to dispersal of populations are called demic, and those due to the incorporation of hunter-gatherers are called cultural. It is well-known that, after agriculture appeared in West Africa, it spread across most of subequatorial Africa. It has been proposed that this spread took place alongside with that of Bantu languages. In eastern and southeastern Africa, it is also linked to the Early Iron Age. From the beginning of the last millennium BC, cereal agriculture spread rapidly from the Great Lakes area eastwards to the East African coast, and southwards to northeastern South Africa. Here we show that the southwards spread took place substantially more rapidly (1.50–2.27 km/y) than the eastwards spread (0.59–1.27 km/y). Such a faster southwards spread could be the result of a stronger cultural effect. To assess this possibility, we compare these observed ranges to those obtained from a demic-cultural wave-of-advance model. We find that both spreads were driven by demic diffusion, in agreement with most archaeological, linguistic and genetic results. Nonetheless, the southwards spread seems to have indeed a stronger cultural component, which could lead support to the hypothesis that, at the southern areas, the interaction with pastoralist people may have played a significant role. Public Library of Science 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6506142/ /pubmed/31067220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215573 Text en © 2019 Isern, Fort http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Isern, Neus Fort, Joaquim Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa |
title | Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa |
title_full | Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa |
title_fullStr | Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa |
title_short | Assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the Bantu spread into southeastern Africa |
title_sort | assessing the importance of cultural diffusion in the bantu spread into southeastern africa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31067220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215573 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isernneus assessingtheimportanceofculturaldiffusioninthebantuspreadintosoutheasternafrica AT fortjoaquim assessingtheimportanceofculturaldiffusioninthebantuspreadintosoutheasternafrica |