Cargando…

Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Belgium: characteristics and influencing factors

Background and study aims  Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is an important quality parameter of colonoscopy. Most studies have shown that the risk for colorectal cancer is reduced after an index colonoscopy for screening or diagnostic purposes with or without polypectomy. In this study, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macken, Elisabeth, Van Dongen, Stefan, De Brabander, Isabel, Francque, Sven, Driessen, Ann, Van Hal, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0751-2660
_version_ 1783416843318329344
author Macken, Elisabeth
Van Dongen, Stefan
De Brabander, Isabel
Francque, Sven
Driessen, Ann
Van Hal, Guido
author_facet Macken, Elisabeth
Van Dongen, Stefan
De Brabander, Isabel
Francque, Sven
Driessen, Ann
Van Hal, Guido
author_sort Macken, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is an important quality parameter of colonoscopy. Most studies have shown that the risk for colorectal cancer is reduced after an index colonoscopy for screening or diagnostic purposes with or without polypectomy. In this study, we aimed to quantify and describe PCCRC in Belgium, including the possible relationships with patient, physician, and colonoscopy characteristics. Patients and methods  Reimbursement data on colorectal related medical procedures from the Intermutualistic Agency (IMA-AIM) were linked with data on clinical and pathological staging of colorectal cancer (CRC) available at the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR) over a period covering 9 years (2002 – 2010). Results  In total, 63 518 colorectal cancers were identified in 61 616 patients between 2002 and 2010. We calculated a mean PCCRC rate of 7.6 %. PCCRC was significantly higher in older people and correlated significantly with polyp detection rate and the number of resections and procedures performed per year per physician. Conditional observed survival, given still alive 3 years since first colonoscopy, for PCCRC was worse than for CRC. Older patients and patients with invasive carcinomas had a worse outcome. Conclusions  Although no quality register exists in Belgium, we were able to demonstrate that PCCRC in Belgium is directly related to the experience of the physician performing the procedure. In the absence of a quality register, utilization of population-based data sources proved to be a valuable tool to identify quality parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6506335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65063352019-05-09 Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Belgium: characteristics and influencing factors Macken, Elisabeth Van Dongen, Stefan De Brabander, Isabel Francque, Sven Driessen, Ann Van Hal, Guido Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is an important quality parameter of colonoscopy. Most studies have shown that the risk for colorectal cancer is reduced after an index colonoscopy for screening or diagnostic purposes with or without polypectomy. In this study, we aimed to quantify and describe PCCRC in Belgium, including the possible relationships with patient, physician, and colonoscopy characteristics. Patients and methods  Reimbursement data on colorectal related medical procedures from the Intermutualistic Agency (IMA-AIM) were linked with data on clinical and pathological staging of colorectal cancer (CRC) available at the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR) over a period covering 9 years (2002 – 2010). Results  In total, 63 518 colorectal cancers were identified in 61 616 patients between 2002 and 2010. We calculated a mean PCCRC rate of 7.6 %. PCCRC was significantly higher in older people and correlated significantly with polyp detection rate and the number of resections and procedures performed per year per physician. Conditional observed survival, given still alive 3 years since first colonoscopy, for PCCRC was worse than for CRC. Older patients and patients with invasive carcinomas had a worse outcome. Conclusions  Although no quality register exists in Belgium, we were able to demonstrate that PCCRC in Belgium is directly related to the experience of the physician performing the procedure. In the absence of a quality register, utilization of population-based data sources proved to be a valuable tool to identify quality parameters. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-05 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6506335/ /pubmed/31073539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0751-2660 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Macken, Elisabeth
Van Dongen, Stefan
De Brabander, Isabel
Francque, Sven
Driessen, Ann
Van Hal, Guido
Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Belgium: characteristics and influencing factors
title Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Belgium: characteristics and influencing factors
title_full Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Belgium: characteristics and influencing factors
title_fullStr Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Belgium: characteristics and influencing factors
title_full_unstemmed Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Belgium: characteristics and influencing factors
title_short Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Belgium: characteristics and influencing factors
title_sort post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in belgium: characteristics and influencing factors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0751-2660
work_keys_str_mv AT mackenelisabeth postcolonoscopycolorectalcancerinbelgiumcharacteristicsandinfluencingfactors
AT vandongenstefan postcolonoscopycolorectalcancerinbelgiumcharacteristicsandinfluencingfactors
AT debrabanderisabel postcolonoscopycolorectalcancerinbelgiumcharacteristicsandinfluencingfactors
AT francquesven postcolonoscopycolorectalcancerinbelgiumcharacteristicsandinfluencingfactors
AT driessenann postcolonoscopycolorectalcancerinbelgiumcharacteristicsandinfluencingfactors
AT vanhalguido postcolonoscopycolorectalcancerinbelgiumcharacteristicsandinfluencingfactors