Cargando…

Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry

The prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging. The aim of current analysis was to investigate the time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after AF catheter ablation during long-term follow-up. The study included 879 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kornej, Jelena, Schumacher, Katja, Zeynalova, Samira, Sommer, Philipp, Arya, Arash, Weiß, Manuela, Piorkowski, Christopher, Husser, Daniela, Bollmann, Andreas, Lip, Gregory Y. H., Hindricks, Gerhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31068651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43644-2
_version_ 1783416862465327104
author Kornej, Jelena
Schumacher, Katja
Zeynalova, Samira
Sommer, Philipp
Arya, Arash
Weiß, Manuela
Piorkowski, Christopher
Husser, Daniela
Bollmann, Andreas
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Hindricks, Gerhard
author_facet Kornej, Jelena
Schumacher, Katja
Zeynalova, Samira
Sommer, Philipp
Arya, Arash
Weiß, Manuela
Piorkowski, Christopher
Husser, Daniela
Bollmann, Andreas
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Hindricks, Gerhard
author_sort Kornej, Jelena
collection PubMed
description The prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging. The aim of current analysis was to investigate the time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after AF catheter ablation during long-term follow-up. The study included 879 patients (61 ± 10 years; 64% males; 39% persistent AF) undergoing first AF catheter ablation. Rhythm outcomes were documented using 7-days Holter monitoring. The APPLE score (Age, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR, Left atrium (LA), EF) was calculated at baseline, while MB-LATER score (Male gender, Bundle branch block, LA, AF Type, Early Recurrences) 3 months after ablation. The median follow-up time was 37 months [95%CI 35;39]. ERAF and LRAF occurred in 45% and 64%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, ERAF (HR 2.095, 95%CI 1.762–2.490, p < 0.001) was strongly associated with LRAF. The APPLE (HR 1.385, 95%CI 1.276–1.505, p < 0.001) and MB-LATER (HR 1.326, 95%CI 1.239–1.419, p < 0.001) scores significantly predicted LRAF during follow-up. On the ROC analysis, APPLE (AUC 0.640, 95%CI 0.602–0.677, p < 0.001) and MB-LATER (AUC 0.654, 95%CI 0.616–0.691, p < 0.001) demonstrated moderate prediction. Summarizing, ERAF was the strongest predictor for LRAF in time-dependent manner. The APPLE and MB-LATER scores demonstrated moderate prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6506496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65064962019-05-21 Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry Kornej, Jelena Schumacher, Katja Zeynalova, Samira Sommer, Philipp Arya, Arash Weiß, Manuela Piorkowski, Christopher Husser, Daniela Bollmann, Andreas Lip, Gregory Y. H. Hindricks, Gerhard Sci Rep Article The prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging. The aim of current analysis was to investigate the time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences after AF catheter ablation during long-term follow-up. The study included 879 patients (61 ± 10 years; 64% males; 39% persistent AF) undergoing first AF catheter ablation. Rhythm outcomes were documented using 7-days Holter monitoring. The APPLE score (Age, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR, Left atrium (LA), EF) was calculated at baseline, while MB-LATER score (Male gender, Bundle branch block, LA, AF Type, Early Recurrences) 3 months after ablation. The median follow-up time was 37 months [95%CI 35;39]. ERAF and LRAF occurred in 45% and 64%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, ERAF (HR 2.095, 95%CI 1.762–2.490, p < 0.001) was strongly associated with LRAF. The APPLE (HR 1.385, 95%CI 1.276–1.505, p < 0.001) and MB-LATER (HR 1.326, 95%CI 1.239–1.419, p < 0.001) scores significantly predicted LRAF during follow-up. On the ROC analysis, APPLE (AUC 0.640, 95%CI 0.602–0.677, p < 0.001) and MB-LATER (AUC 0.654, 95%CI 0.616–0.691, p < 0.001) demonstrated moderate prediction. Summarizing, ERAF was the strongest predictor for LRAF in time-dependent manner. The APPLE and MB-LATER scores demonstrated moderate prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long term follow-up. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6506496/ /pubmed/31068651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43644-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kornej, Jelena
Schumacher, Katja
Zeynalova, Samira
Sommer, Philipp
Arya, Arash
Weiß, Manuela
Piorkowski, Christopher
Husser, Daniela
Bollmann, Andreas
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Hindricks, Gerhard
Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry
title Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry
title_full Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry
title_fullStr Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry
title_full_unstemmed Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry
title_short Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry
title_sort time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the leipzig heart center af ablation registry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31068651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43644-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kornejjelena timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT schumacherkatja timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT zeynalovasamira timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT sommerphilipp timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT aryaarash timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT weißmanuela timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT piorkowskichristopher timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT husserdaniela timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT bollmannandreas timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT lipgregoryyh timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry
AT hindricksgerhard timedependentpredictionofarrhythmiarecurrencesduringlongtermfollowupinpatientsundergoingcatheterablationofatrialfibrillationtheleipzigheartcenterafablationregistry