Cargando…

Effects of MMP-1 1G/2G polymorphism on osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify the role of Matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1) -1607 1G/2G (rs1799750) polymorphism on the osteoarthritis (OA) risk. METHODS: Articles were selected by retrieving the Web of Science, Embase and Pubmed. The strength of the association between -1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Bo, Xing, Run-lin, Zhang, Li, Huang, Zheng-quan, Zhang, Nong-Shan, Mao, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2018.12.009
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify the role of Matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1) -1607 1G/2G (rs1799750) polymorphism on the osteoarthritis (OA) risk. METHODS: Articles were selected by retrieving the Web of Science, Embase and Pubmed. The strength of the association between -1607 1G/2G polymorphism and OA risk was assessed by odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study. RESULTS: No significant association between -1607 1G/2G polymorphism and OA risk was found in all the models overall (2G2G vs 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.69 (0.36–1.32), P = 0.54; 2G2G + 2G1G vs 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.88 (0.47–1.63), P = 0.69; 2G2G vs 2G1G + 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 1.30 (0.68–2.47), P = 0.41; 2 G vs 1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.90 (0.86–1.54), P = 0.66). By subgroup analysis, significant association was found in the “< 60 years” group (2G2G vs 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 3.46 (2.13–5.62), P = 0.00; 2G2G + 2G1G vs 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.49 (0.31–0.79), P = 0.00; 2G2G vs 2G1G + 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 2.74 (1.80–4.16, P = 0.00; 2 G vs 1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.56 (0.35–0.89), P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that -1607 1G/2G polymorphism may increase the susceptibility to OA among the younger populations (<60 years). More studies with detailed information are needed to validate our conclusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I Diagnostic Study.