Cargando…

Oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: An interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients have a four- to fivefold greater risk of thrombosis than the general population. Recommended treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis is 3–6 months of low-molecular-weight heparin. The ‘select-d’ trial is an open-label, randomised, multi-centre pilot trial in patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hutchinson, Ann, Rees, Sophie, Young, Annie, Maraveyas, Anthony, Date, Kathryn, Johnson, Miriam J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30488789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216318815377
_version_ 1783416929897152512
author Hutchinson, Ann
Rees, Sophie
Young, Annie
Maraveyas, Anthony
Date, Kathryn
Johnson, Miriam J
author_facet Hutchinson, Ann
Rees, Sophie
Young, Annie
Maraveyas, Anthony
Date, Kathryn
Johnson, Miriam J
author_sort Hutchinson, Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer patients have a four- to fivefold greater risk of thrombosis than the general population. Recommended treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis is 3–6 months of low-molecular-weight heparin. The ‘select-d’ trial is an open-label, randomised, multi-centre pilot trial in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, utilising dalteparin (low-molecular-weight heparin) versus rivaroxaban (a direct oral anticoagulant), to assess effectiveness and safety. AIM: To explore patient and informal carers’ experiences of cancer-associated thrombosis and their experience and understanding of the risk–benefit of thrombosis treatment. DESIGN: Qualitative substudy of the select-d trial, using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were purposively sampled (n = 37 patients; 46% male; age 40–89; 9 with carer present). RESULTS: Three themes were found: experience of cancer-associated thrombosis, experience of anticoagulation and risk–benefit balance of the two modes of administration. Some were shocked by their thrombosis diagnosis (most were unaware of their risk), but others found it insignificant compared with cancer. Most patients found tablets more convenient, but injections were acceptable in the context of having cancer. While most were happy to follow medical advice, others weighed preference on the basis of effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Lack of awareness of thrombosis risk is concerning; cancer patients must be informed to enable prompt help-seeking. Tablets could provide a welcome choice for patients if there is equivalent risk–benefit to injected anticoagulants. Patients trust their clinicians to tailor their treatment. Future research could explore the effect of routine information giving about the risk of thrombosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6506899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65068992019-06-03 Oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: An interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial Hutchinson, Ann Rees, Sophie Young, Annie Maraveyas, Anthony Date, Kathryn Johnson, Miriam J Palliat Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Cancer patients have a four- to fivefold greater risk of thrombosis than the general population. Recommended treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis is 3–6 months of low-molecular-weight heparin. The ‘select-d’ trial is an open-label, randomised, multi-centre pilot trial in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, utilising dalteparin (low-molecular-weight heparin) versus rivaroxaban (a direct oral anticoagulant), to assess effectiveness and safety. AIM: To explore patient and informal carers’ experiences of cancer-associated thrombosis and their experience and understanding of the risk–benefit of thrombosis treatment. DESIGN: Qualitative substudy of the select-d trial, using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were purposively sampled (n = 37 patients; 46% male; age 40–89; 9 with carer present). RESULTS: Three themes were found: experience of cancer-associated thrombosis, experience of anticoagulation and risk–benefit balance of the two modes of administration. Some were shocked by their thrombosis diagnosis (most were unaware of their risk), but others found it insignificant compared with cancer. Most patients found tablets more convenient, but injections were acceptable in the context of having cancer. While most were happy to follow medical advice, others weighed preference on the basis of effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Lack of awareness of thrombosis risk is concerning; cancer patients must be informed to enable prompt help-seeking. Tablets could provide a welcome choice for patients if there is equivalent risk–benefit to injected anticoagulants. Patients trust their clinicians to tailor their treatment. Future research could explore the effect of routine information giving about the risk of thrombosis. SAGE Publications 2018-11-29 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6506899/ /pubmed/30488789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216318815377 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hutchinson, Ann
Rees, Sophie
Young, Annie
Maraveyas, Anthony
Date, Kathryn
Johnson, Miriam J
Oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: An interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial
title Oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: An interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial
title_full Oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: An interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial
title_fullStr Oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: An interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial
title_full_unstemmed Oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: An interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial
title_short Oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: An interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial
title_sort oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: an interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30488789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216318815377
work_keys_str_mv AT hutchinsonann oralanticoagulationispreferabletoinjectedbutonlyifitissafeandeffectiveaninterviewstudyofpatientandcarerexperienceoforalandinjectedanticoagulanttherapyforcancerassociatedthrombosisintheselectdtrial
AT reessophie oralanticoagulationispreferabletoinjectedbutonlyifitissafeandeffectiveaninterviewstudyofpatientandcarerexperienceoforalandinjectedanticoagulanttherapyforcancerassociatedthrombosisintheselectdtrial
AT youngannie oralanticoagulationispreferabletoinjectedbutonlyifitissafeandeffectiveaninterviewstudyofpatientandcarerexperienceoforalandinjectedanticoagulanttherapyforcancerassociatedthrombosisintheselectdtrial
AT maraveyasanthony oralanticoagulationispreferabletoinjectedbutonlyifitissafeandeffectiveaninterviewstudyofpatientandcarerexperienceoforalandinjectedanticoagulanttherapyforcancerassociatedthrombosisintheselectdtrial
AT datekathryn oralanticoagulationispreferabletoinjectedbutonlyifitissafeandeffectiveaninterviewstudyofpatientandcarerexperienceoforalandinjectedanticoagulanttherapyforcancerassociatedthrombosisintheselectdtrial
AT johnsonmiriamj oralanticoagulationispreferabletoinjectedbutonlyifitissafeandeffectiveaninterviewstudyofpatientandcarerexperienceoforalandinjectedanticoagulanttherapyforcancerassociatedthrombosisintheselectdtrial