Cargando…

Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study

BACKGROUND: The ward round is a key element in everyday hospital inpatient care irrespective of the medical speciality. The underperformance in conducting ward rounds of junior clinicians has already been described. Therefore, necessary skills and competences of clinicians need to be defined, taught...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vietz, Elisa, März, Esther, Lottspeich, Christian, Wölfel, Teresa, Fischer, Martin R., Schmidmaier, Ralf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31068159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1554-6
_version_ 1783416942887960576
author Vietz, Elisa
März, Esther
Lottspeich, Christian
Wölfel, Teresa
Fischer, Martin R.
Schmidmaier, Ralf
author_facet Vietz, Elisa
März, Esther
Lottspeich, Christian
Wölfel, Teresa
Fischer, Martin R.
Schmidmaier, Ralf
author_sort Vietz, Elisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ward round is a key element in everyday hospital inpatient care irrespective of the medical speciality. The underperformance in conducting ward rounds of junior clinicians has already been described. Therefore, necessary skills and competences of clinicians need to be defined, taught and delivered for curricular instruction. In addition to published data on ward round competences in internal medicine this study aims to determine the common competences for surgical and psychiatric ward rounds in order to find differences depending on the speciality. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with surgical (N = 30) and psychiatric ward staff (N = 30) of a university hospital and five community hospitals were conducted. Competences necessary for performing ward rounds as well as structural aspects were identified by systematic content analysis and frequency analysis, supported by adequate statistics. RESULTS: Relevant competences for both fields are: collaborative clinical reasoning, communication with the patient and the team, organization, teamwork, management of difficult situations, self-management, error-management, teaching, empathy, nonverbal communication, patient-management and professionalism. Clinical skills were mentioned more often in surgical interviews, while nonverbal communication was described more often in psychiatric interviews. Empathy and communication with the team were more frequently attributed to psychiatric residents. CONCLUSION: The competences which were identified as necessary for conducting a ward round in surgery and psychiatry are similar and correspond to previously reported competences in internal medicine. Clinical skills are of greater importance in surgery than in psychiatry. Concerning empathy and nonverbal communication, further research is needed to determine whether they are of minor importance in surgery or whether there is a lack of awareness of these competences. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1554-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6506958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65069582019-05-13 Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study Vietz, Elisa März, Esther Lottspeich, Christian Wölfel, Teresa Fischer, Martin R. Schmidmaier, Ralf BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The ward round is a key element in everyday hospital inpatient care irrespective of the medical speciality. The underperformance in conducting ward rounds of junior clinicians has already been described. Therefore, necessary skills and competences of clinicians need to be defined, taught and delivered for curricular instruction. In addition to published data on ward round competences in internal medicine this study aims to determine the common competences for surgical and psychiatric ward rounds in order to find differences depending on the speciality. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with surgical (N = 30) and psychiatric ward staff (N = 30) of a university hospital and five community hospitals were conducted. Competences necessary for performing ward rounds as well as structural aspects were identified by systematic content analysis and frequency analysis, supported by adequate statistics. RESULTS: Relevant competences for both fields are: collaborative clinical reasoning, communication with the patient and the team, organization, teamwork, management of difficult situations, self-management, error-management, teaching, empathy, nonverbal communication, patient-management and professionalism. Clinical skills were mentioned more often in surgical interviews, while nonverbal communication was described more often in psychiatric interviews. Empathy and communication with the team were more frequently attributed to psychiatric residents. CONCLUSION: The competences which were identified as necessary for conducting a ward round in surgery and psychiatry are similar and correspond to previously reported competences in internal medicine. Clinical skills are of greater importance in surgery than in psychiatry. Concerning empathy and nonverbal communication, further research is needed to determine whether they are of minor importance in surgery or whether there is a lack of awareness of these competences. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1554-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6506958/ /pubmed/31068159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1554-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vietz, Elisa
März, Esther
Lottspeich, Christian
Wölfel, Teresa
Fischer, Martin R.
Schmidmaier, Ralf
Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study
title Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study
title_full Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study
title_fullStr Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study
title_full_unstemmed Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study
title_short Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study
title_sort ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6506958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31068159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1554-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vietzelisa wardroundcompetencesinsurgeryandpsychiatryacomparativemultidisciplinaryinterviewstudy
AT marzesther wardroundcompetencesinsurgeryandpsychiatryacomparativemultidisciplinaryinterviewstudy
AT lottspeichchristian wardroundcompetencesinsurgeryandpsychiatryacomparativemultidisciplinaryinterviewstudy
AT wolfelteresa wardroundcompetencesinsurgeryandpsychiatryacomparativemultidisciplinaryinterviewstudy
AT fischermartinr wardroundcompetencesinsurgeryandpsychiatryacomparativemultidisciplinaryinterviewstudy
AT schmidmaierralf wardroundcompetencesinsurgeryandpsychiatryacomparativemultidisciplinaryinterviewstudy