Cargando…

Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has become popular because of the lower incidence of wound complications. However, achieving an anatomic reduction that provides a satisfactory outcome is difficult using minimally invasive surgery. Our study aimed to evaluate the reduction and clinical outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Ye, Liu, Jianheng, Zhang, Gongzi, Ji, Xinran, Zhang, Wei, Zhang, Lihai, Tang, Peifu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1162-5
_version_ 1783416947320291328
author Peng, Ye
Liu, Jianheng
Zhang, Gongzi
Ji, Xinran
Zhang, Wei
Zhang, Lihai
Tang, Peifu
author_facet Peng, Ye
Liu, Jianheng
Zhang, Gongzi
Ji, Xinran
Zhang, Wei
Zhang, Lihai
Tang, Peifu
author_sort Peng, Ye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has become popular because of the lower incidence of wound complications. However, achieving an anatomic reduction that provides a satisfactory outcome is difficult using minimally invasive surgery. Our study aimed to evaluate the reduction and clinical outcomes of closed reduction and percutaneous fixation treatment using a closed reduction traction device for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures compared with traditional open reduction plate fixation using an extended lateral approach. METHODS: A total of 40 patients and 45 feet with calcaneus fractures from 2012 to 2016 were studied. The open reduction plate fixation group (24 feet) was compared to the closed reduction percutaneous fixation group (21 feet) with a traction device. The reduction assessments included length, width, height, Bohler’s angle, Gissane’s angle, and varus or valgus angle before and after surgery. The clinical outcomes included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot score and the visual analog score for pain, length of stay, and complication rate. RESULTS: The patients were followed up for an average of 16.53 ± 3.95 months. No significant differences in reduction were observed between the open and closed groups (P > 0.05). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores of the two groups were 80.29 ± 6.15 and 83.62 ± 6.95 (open versus closed) (P = 0.0957). The visual analog scores of the open and closed groups were 1.50 ± 1.22 and 0.81 ± 0.87 (P = 0.0364). The lengths of stay in the open and closed groups were 9.63 ± 2.72 days and 6.71 ± 1.85 days (P = 0.0002). The complication rates of the open and closed groups were 20.8% (5/24) and 4.8% (1/21) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The closed reduction percutaneous fixation with traction device method may provide equivalent reduction results and superior outcomes for the length of stay, VAS score, and complication rate for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6507023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65070232019-05-13 Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study Peng, Ye Liu, Jianheng Zhang, Gongzi Ji, Xinran Zhang, Wei Zhang, Lihai Tang, Peifu J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has become popular because of the lower incidence of wound complications. However, achieving an anatomic reduction that provides a satisfactory outcome is difficult using minimally invasive surgery. Our study aimed to evaluate the reduction and clinical outcomes of closed reduction and percutaneous fixation treatment using a closed reduction traction device for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures compared with traditional open reduction plate fixation using an extended lateral approach. METHODS: A total of 40 patients and 45 feet with calcaneus fractures from 2012 to 2016 were studied. The open reduction plate fixation group (24 feet) was compared to the closed reduction percutaneous fixation group (21 feet) with a traction device. The reduction assessments included length, width, height, Bohler’s angle, Gissane’s angle, and varus or valgus angle before and after surgery. The clinical outcomes included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot score and the visual analog score for pain, length of stay, and complication rate. RESULTS: The patients were followed up for an average of 16.53 ± 3.95 months. No significant differences in reduction were observed between the open and closed groups (P > 0.05). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores of the two groups were 80.29 ± 6.15 and 83.62 ± 6.95 (open versus closed) (P = 0.0957). The visual analog scores of the open and closed groups were 1.50 ± 1.22 and 0.81 ± 0.87 (P = 0.0364). The lengths of stay in the open and closed groups were 9.63 ± 2.72 days and 6.71 ± 1.85 days (P = 0.0002). The complication rates of the open and closed groups were 20.8% (5/24) and 4.8% (1/21) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The closed reduction percutaneous fixation with traction device method may provide equivalent reduction results and superior outcomes for the length of stay, VAS score, and complication rate for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. BioMed Central 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6507023/ /pubmed/31072333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1162-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peng, Ye
Liu, Jianheng
Zhang, Gongzi
Ji, Xinran
Zhang, Wei
Zhang, Lihai
Tang, Peifu
Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study
title Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study
title_full Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study
title_short Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study
title_sort reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1162-5
work_keys_str_mv AT pengye reductionandfunctionaloutcomeofopenreductionplatefixationversusminimallyinvasivereductionwithpercutaneousscrewfixationfordisplacedcalcaneusfracturearetrospectivestudy
AT liujianheng reductionandfunctionaloutcomeofopenreductionplatefixationversusminimallyinvasivereductionwithpercutaneousscrewfixationfordisplacedcalcaneusfracturearetrospectivestudy
AT zhanggongzi reductionandfunctionaloutcomeofopenreductionplatefixationversusminimallyinvasivereductionwithpercutaneousscrewfixationfordisplacedcalcaneusfracturearetrospectivestudy
AT jixinran reductionandfunctionaloutcomeofopenreductionplatefixationversusminimallyinvasivereductionwithpercutaneousscrewfixationfordisplacedcalcaneusfracturearetrospectivestudy
AT zhangwei reductionandfunctionaloutcomeofopenreductionplatefixationversusminimallyinvasivereductionwithpercutaneousscrewfixationfordisplacedcalcaneusfracturearetrospectivestudy
AT zhanglihai reductionandfunctionaloutcomeofopenreductionplatefixationversusminimallyinvasivereductionwithpercutaneousscrewfixationfordisplacedcalcaneusfracturearetrospectivestudy
AT tangpeifu reductionandfunctionaloutcomeofopenreductionplatefixationversusminimallyinvasivereductionwithpercutaneousscrewfixationfordisplacedcalcaneusfracturearetrospectivestudy