Cargando…
Fistuloplasty using a radiation-and-time-saving sheathless balloon catheter
INTRODUCTION: Sheath placement in dialysis access interventions is traditionally necessary to obtain imaging, guide percutaneous angioplasty, and evaluate results. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing sheathless Arterio-venous (AV) access interventions using a novel perc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1129729818804991 |
_version_ | 1783416952215044096 |
---|---|
author | Crawford, Joel Kokkosis, Angela Kim, Pamela Gasparis, Antonios Labropoulos, Nicos |
author_facet | Crawford, Joel Kokkosis, Angela Kim, Pamela Gasparis, Antonios Labropoulos, Nicos |
author_sort | Crawford, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Sheath placement in dialysis access interventions is traditionally necessary to obtain imaging, guide percutaneous angioplasty, and evaluate results. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing sheathless Arterio-venous (AV) access interventions using a novel percutaneous angioplasty balloon catheter. METHODS: Between May and September 2017, data on all dialysis access interventions using a novel percutaneous angioplasty balloon with a dedicated injection port were collected. All procedures were performed without a sheath. Success was established as no conversion to sheath placement. Demographic data, location of lesion, time to perform procedure, amount of contrast used, radiation exposure, and access complications were recorded. Ultrasound was used to evaluate access site complications. RESULTS: Sheathless interventions were successful in 24 patients with the mean age of 62 years (29–94). There were 5 PTFE grafts and 19 native fistulas. Lesions were located anywhere from the arterial anastomosis to the cephalic arch. The average balloon size was 6 mm (5–7 mm), and the procedure time was 15.8 min (8–45 min). No access site complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Sheathless intervention is feasible with several potential advantages, including short procedure time, minimal contrast volume, and reduced radiation exposure. Finally, the lower profile at the access site may result in fewer complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6507052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65070522019-06-03 Fistuloplasty using a radiation-and-time-saving sheathless balloon catheter Crawford, Joel Kokkosis, Angela Kim, Pamela Gasparis, Antonios Labropoulos, Nicos J Vasc Access Original Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Sheath placement in dialysis access interventions is traditionally necessary to obtain imaging, guide percutaneous angioplasty, and evaluate results. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing sheathless Arterio-venous (AV) access interventions using a novel percutaneous angioplasty balloon catheter. METHODS: Between May and September 2017, data on all dialysis access interventions using a novel percutaneous angioplasty balloon with a dedicated injection port were collected. All procedures were performed without a sheath. Success was established as no conversion to sheath placement. Demographic data, location of lesion, time to perform procedure, amount of contrast used, radiation exposure, and access complications were recorded. Ultrasound was used to evaluate access site complications. RESULTS: Sheathless interventions were successful in 24 patients with the mean age of 62 years (29–94). There were 5 PTFE grafts and 19 native fistulas. Lesions were located anywhere from the arterial anastomosis to the cephalic arch. The average balloon size was 6 mm (5–7 mm), and the procedure time was 15.8 min (8–45 min). No access site complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Sheathless intervention is feasible with several potential advantages, including short procedure time, minimal contrast volume, and reduced radiation exposure. Finally, the lower profile at the access site may result in fewer complications. SAGE Publications 2018-10-14 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6507052/ /pubmed/30319012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1129729818804991 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Crawford, Joel Kokkosis, Angela Kim, Pamela Gasparis, Antonios Labropoulos, Nicos Fistuloplasty using a radiation-and-time-saving sheathless balloon catheter |
title | Fistuloplasty using a radiation-and-time-saving sheathless balloon
catheter |
title_full | Fistuloplasty using a radiation-and-time-saving sheathless balloon
catheter |
title_fullStr | Fistuloplasty using a radiation-and-time-saving sheathless balloon
catheter |
title_full_unstemmed | Fistuloplasty using a radiation-and-time-saving sheathless balloon
catheter |
title_short | Fistuloplasty using a radiation-and-time-saving sheathless balloon
catheter |
title_sort | fistuloplasty using a radiation-and-time-saving sheathless balloon
catheter |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1129729818804991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crawfordjoel fistuloplastyusingaradiationandtimesavingsheathlessballooncatheter AT kokkosisangela fistuloplastyusingaradiationandtimesavingsheathlessballooncatheter AT kimpamela fistuloplastyusingaradiationandtimesavingsheathlessballooncatheter AT gasparisantonios fistuloplastyusingaradiationandtimesavingsheathlessballooncatheter AT labropoulosnicos fistuloplastyusingaradiationandtimesavingsheathlessballooncatheter |