Cargando…

International approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: It’s the same, but different

INTRODUCTION: Pre-registration / entry-level programmes of study provide the core knowledge, skills and abilities required for clinical practice. These programmes are where students are introduced to specialist domains of practice and begin to shape their professional interests. The aim of this rese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Cylie M., Nester, Chris, Morrison, Stewart C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-019-0339-9
_version_ 1783416976821977088
author Williams, Cylie M.
Nester, Chris
Morrison, Stewart C.
author_facet Williams, Cylie M.
Nester, Chris
Morrison, Stewart C.
author_sort Williams, Cylie M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pre-registration / entry-level programmes of study provide the core knowledge, skills and abilities required for clinical practice. These programmes are where students are introduced to specialist domains of practice and begin to shape their professional interests. The aim of this research was to describe paediatric curricula within pre-registration and entry level podiatry programmes across comparable universities and offer a contemporary synthesis of international practices. METHODS: An exploratory, cross-sectional, online survey was undertaken across a three-month period. Representatives from podiatry programmes delivering pre-registration or entry level podiatry degrees in which graduates are eligible for Professional and Statutory Body registration within their country (deemed at a Bachelor degree or higher), were invited to participate. The survey was administered online using Online Surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data due to the exploratory nature of the research question and design. RESULTS: There were responses from seven (54% of 13) universities in the United Kingdom (UK), nine (100% of nine) universities in Australia and four (50% of eight) of the invited universities external to the UK and Australia (New Zealand, Malta, Ireland, South Africa). There was some variation in curriculum content, but all universities reported to cover ontogeny and developmental milestones and general paediatric orthopaedic conditions. There was further discrepancy with the number of hours dedicated to paediatric podiatry within the curricula (ranging from < 5 h to > 26 h). CONCLUSION: The findings from this study highlight some disparity in the delivery of training for students relating to paediatrics. The data suggests that there is a need for international coordination in establishing priorities for the paediatric curricula. This will ensure consistency in baseline knowledge, modes of training, amount and nature of curriculum delivery during undergraduate or entry level podiatry training. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-019-0339-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6507174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65071742019-05-13 International approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: It’s the same, but different Williams, Cylie M. Nester, Chris Morrison, Stewart C. J Foot Ankle Res Research INTRODUCTION: Pre-registration / entry-level programmes of study provide the core knowledge, skills and abilities required for clinical practice. These programmes are where students are introduced to specialist domains of practice and begin to shape their professional interests. The aim of this research was to describe paediatric curricula within pre-registration and entry level podiatry programmes across comparable universities and offer a contemporary synthesis of international practices. METHODS: An exploratory, cross-sectional, online survey was undertaken across a three-month period. Representatives from podiatry programmes delivering pre-registration or entry level podiatry degrees in which graduates are eligible for Professional and Statutory Body registration within their country (deemed at a Bachelor degree or higher), were invited to participate. The survey was administered online using Online Surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data due to the exploratory nature of the research question and design. RESULTS: There were responses from seven (54% of 13) universities in the United Kingdom (UK), nine (100% of nine) universities in Australia and four (50% of eight) of the invited universities external to the UK and Australia (New Zealand, Malta, Ireland, South Africa). There was some variation in curriculum content, but all universities reported to cover ontogeny and developmental milestones and general paediatric orthopaedic conditions. There was further discrepancy with the number of hours dedicated to paediatric podiatry within the curricula (ranging from < 5 h to > 26 h). CONCLUSION: The findings from this study highlight some disparity in the delivery of training for students relating to paediatrics. The data suggests that there is a need for international coordination in establishing priorities for the paediatric curricula. This will ensure consistency in baseline knowledge, modes of training, amount and nature of curriculum delivery during undergraduate or entry level podiatry training. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-019-0339-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6507174/ /pubmed/31086569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-019-0339-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Williams, Cylie M.
Nester, Chris
Morrison, Stewart C.
International approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: It’s the same, but different
title International approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: It’s the same, but different
title_full International approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: It’s the same, but different
title_fullStr International approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: It’s the same, but different
title_full_unstemmed International approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: It’s the same, but different
title_short International approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: It’s the same, but different
title_sort international approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: it’s the same, but different
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-019-0339-9
work_keys_str_mv AT williamscyliem internationalapproachestopaediatricpodiatrycurriculaitsthesamebutdifferent
AT nesterchris internationalapproachestopaediatricpodiatrycurriculaitsthesamebutdifferent
AT morrisonstewartc internationalapproachestopaediatricpodiatrycurriculaitsthesamebutdifferent