Cargando…

Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab

The aim of the present study was to assess the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers (E-cadherin and vimentin) and their potential significance as prognostic markers in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in the INNOVATIONS trial,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villalobos, Matthias, Czapiewski, Piotr, Reinmuth, Niels, Fischer, Jürgen R., Andreas, Stefan, Kortsik, Cornelius, Serke, Monika, Wolf, Martin, Neuser, Petra, Reuss, Alexander, Schnabel, Philipp A., Thomas, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10153
_version_ 1783417028049108992
author Villalobos, Matthias
Czapiewski, Piotr
Reinmuth, Niels
Fischer, Jürgen R.
Andreas, Stefan
Kortsik, Cornelius
Serke, Monika
Wolf, Martin
Neuser, Petra
Reuss, Alexander
Schnabel, Philipp A.
Thomas, Michael
author_facet Villalobos, Matthias
Czapiewski, Piotr
Reinmuth, Niels
Fischer, Jürgen R.
Andreas, Stefan
Kortsik, Cornelius
Serke, Monika
Wolf, Martin
Neuser, Petra
Reuss, Alexander
Schnabel, Philipp A.
Thomas, Michael
author_sort Villalobos, Matthias
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to assess the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers (E-cadherin and vimentin) and their potential significance as prognostic markers in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in the INNOVATIONS trial, receiving treatment with either erlotinib/bevacizumab (EB) or cisplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab (PGB). The tumor tissues of 104 patients were retrospectively analyzed using immunohistochemistry to assess the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin. The distribution between the treatment arms was 46 patients in the EB-arm and 58 in the PGB-arm. Comparing the treatment arms according to E-cadherin and vimentin expression, the analysis revealed that progression-free survival (PFS) was increased in the PGB treatment group when compared with EB treatment in patients with low expression of E-cadherin [hazard ratio (HR)=0.353; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.189- 0.658; log-rank P=0.0007] and in those with high expression of vimentin [HR=0.276 (95% CI, 0.115- 0.659), log-rank P=0.0021]. In patients that exhibited high E-cadherin and were negative for vimentin, there was no difference in the PFS between the PGB and EB treatment groups. In conclusion, in non-squamous NSCLC with downregulated E-cadherin and upregulated vimentin, the efficacy of chemotherapy with PGB was superior compared with EB; but the same effect was not observed in patients with high E-cadherin and low vimentin. Although increased PFS was observed in patients with PGB treatment compared with EB treatment in the whole analysis populations, in the subgroup of patients with the mesenchymal phenotype, no prognostic or predictive value of either biomarker could be identified. The potential role of bevacizumab in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in the population with the mesenchymal phenotype has to be further explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6507446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65074462019-06-11 Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab Villalobos, Matthias Czapiewski, Piotr Reinmuth, Niels Fischer, Jürgen R. Andreas, Stefan Kortsik, Cornelius Serke, Monika Wolf, Martin Neuser, Petra Reuss, Alexander Schnabel, Philipp A. Thomas, Michael Oncol Lett Articles The aim of the present study was to assess the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers (E-cadherin and vimentin) and their potential significance as prognostic markers in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in the INNOVATIONS trial, receiving treatment with either erlotinib/bevacizumab (EB) or cisplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab (PGB). The tumor tissues of 104 patients were retrospectively analyzed using immunohistochemistry to assess the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin. The distribution between the treatment arms was 46 patients in the EB-arm and 58 in the PGB-arm. Comparing the treatment arms according to E-cadherin and vimentin expression, the analysis revealed that progression-free survival (PFS) was increased in the PGB treatment group when compared with EB treatment in patients with low expression of E-cadherin [hazard ratio (HR)=0.353; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.189- 0.658; log-rank P=0.0007] and in those with high expression of vimentin [HR=0.276 (95% CI, 0.115- 0.659), log-rank P=0.0021]. In patients that exhibited high E-cadherin and were negative for vimentin, there was no difference in the PFS between the PGB and EB treatment groups. In conclusion, in non-squamous NSCLC with downregulated E-cadherin and upregulated vimentin, the efficacy of chemotherapy with PGB was superior compared with EB; but the same effect was not observed in patients with high E-cadherin and low vimentin. Although increased PFS was observed in patients with PGB treatment compared with EB treatment in the whole analysis populations, in the subgroup of patients with the mesenchymal phenotype, no prognostic or predictive value of either biomarker could be identified. The potential role of bevacizumab in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in the population with the mesenchymal phenotype has to be further explored. D.A. Spandidos 2019-06 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6507446/ /pubmed/31186697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10153 Text en Copyright: © Villalobos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Villalobos, Matthias
Czapiewski, Piotr
Reinmuth, Niels
Fischer, Jürgen R.
Andreas, Stefan
Kortsik, Cornelius
Serke, Monika
Wolf, Martin
Neuser, Petra
Reuss, Alexander
Schnabel, Philipp A.
Thomas, Michael
Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab
title Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab
title_full Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab
title_fullStr Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab
title_full_unstemmed Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab
title_short Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab
title_sort impact of emt in stage iiib/iv nsclc treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10153
work_keys_str_mv AT villalobosmatthias impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT czapiewskipiotr impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT reinmuthniels impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT fischerjurgenr impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT andreasstefan impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT kortsikcornelius impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT serkemonika impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT wolfmartin impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT neuserpetra impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT reussalexander impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT schnabelphilippa impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab
AT thomasmichael impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab