Cargando…
Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab
The aim of the present study was to assess the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers (E-cadherin and vimentin) and their potential significance as prognostic markers in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in the INNOVATIONS trial,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10153 |
_version_ | 1783417028049108992 |
---|---|
author | Villalobos, Matthias Czapiewski, Piotr Reinmuth, Niels Fischer, Jürgen R. Andreas, Stefan Kortsik, Cornelius Serke, Monika Wolf, Martin Neuser, Petra Reuss, Alexander Schnabel, Philipp A. Thomas, Michael |
author_facet | Villalobos, Matthias Czapiewski, Piotr Reinmuth, Niels Fischer, Jürgen R. Andreas, Stefan Kortsik, Cornelius Serke, Monika Wolf, Martin Neuser, Petra Reuss, Alexander Schnabel, Philipp A. Thomas, Michael |
author_sort | Villalobos, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to assess the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers (E-cadherin and vimentin) and their potential significance as prognostic markers in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in the INNOVATIONS trial, receiving treatment with either erlotinib/bevacizumab (EB) or cisplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab (PGB). The tumor tissues of 104 patients were retrospectively analyzed using immunohistochemistry to assess the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin. The distribution between the treatment arms was 46 patients in the EB-arm and 58 in the PGB-arm. Comparing the treatment arms according to E-cadherin and vimentin expression, the analysis revealed that progression-free survival (PFS) was increased in the PGB treatment group when compared with EB treatment in patients with low expression of E-cadherin [hazard ratio (HR)=0.353; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.189- 0.658; log-rank P=0.0007] and in those with high expression of vimentin [HR=0.276 (95% CI, 0.115- 0.659), log-rank P=0.0021]. In patients that exhibited high E-cadherin and were negative for vimentin, there was no difference in the PFS between the PGB and EB treatment groups. In conclusion, in non-squamous NSCLC with downregulated E-cadherin and upregulated vimentin, the efficacy of chemotherapy with PGB was superior compared with EB; but the same effect was not observed in patients with high E-cadherin and low vimentin. Although increased PFS was observed in patients with PGB treatment compared with EB treatment in the whole analysis populations, in the subgroup of patients with the mesenchymal phenotype, no prognostic or predictive value of either biomarker could be identified. The potential role of bevacizumab in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in the population with the mesenchymal phenotype has to be further explored. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6507446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65074462019-06-11 Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab Villalobos, Matthias Czapiewski, Piotr Reinmuth, Niels Fischer, Jürgen R. Andreas, Stefan Kortsik, Cornelius Serke, Monika Wolf, Martin Neuser, Petra Reuss, Alexander Schnabel, Philipp A. Thomas, Michael Oncol Lett Articles The aim of the present study was to assess the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition biomarkers (E-cadherin and vimentin) and their potential significance as prognostic markers in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in the INNOVATIONS trial, receiving treatment with either erlotinib/bevacizumab (EB) or cisplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab (PGB). The tumor tissues of 104 patients were retrospectively analyzed using immunohistochemistry to assess the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin. The distribution between the treatment arms was 46 patients in the EB-arm and 58 in the PGB-arm. Comparing the treatment arms according to E-cadherin and vimentin expression, the analysis revealed that progression-free survival (PFS) was increased in the PGB treatment group when compared with EB treatment in patients with low expression of E-cadherin [hazard ratio (HR)=0.353; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.189- 0.658; log-rank P=0.0007] and in those with high expression of vimentin [HR=0.276 (95% CI, 0.115- 0.659), log-rank P=0.0021]. In patients that exhibited high E-cadherin and were negative for vimentin, there was no difference in the PFS between the PGB and EB treatment groups. In conclusion, in non-squamous NSCLC with downregulated E-cadherin and upregulated vimentin, the efficacy of chemotherapy with PGB was superior compared with EB; but the same effect was not observed in patients with high E-cadherin and low vimentin. Although increased PFS was observed in patients with PGB treatment compared with EB treatment in the whole analysis populations, in the subgroup of patients with the mesenchymal phenotype, no prognostic or predictive value of either biomarker could be identified. The potential role of bevacizumab in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in the population with the mesenchymal phenotype has to be further explored. D.A. Spandidos 2019-06 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6507446/ /pubmed/31186697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10153 Text en Copyright: © Villalobos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Villalobos, Matthias Czapiewski, Piotr Reinmuth, Niels Fischer, Jürgen R. Andreas, Stefan Kortsik, Cornelius Serke, Monika Wolf, Martin Neuser, Petra Reuss, Alexander Schnabel, Philipp A. Thomas, Michael Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab |
title | Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab |
title_full | Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab |
title_fullStr | Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab |
title_short | Impact of EMT in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab |
title_sort | impact of emt in stage iiib/iv nsclc treated with erlotinib and bevacizumab when compared with cisplatin, gemcitabine and bevacizumab |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villalobosmatthias impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT czapiewskipiotr impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT reinmuthniels impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT fischerjurgenr impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT andreasstefan impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT kortsikcornelius impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT serkemonika impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT wolfmartin impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT neuserpetra impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT reussalexander impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT schnabelphilippa impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab AT thomasmichael impactofemtinstageiiibivnsclctreatedwitherlotinibandbevacizumabwhencomparedwithcisplatingemcitabineandbevacizumab |