Cargando…

Clinical implications of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main reason for premature death in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hyperglycemia, the hallmark of diabetes, has long been considered the link between diabetes and CVD, and many trials focused on preventing CVD manifestations by means of tight glucose control. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mellbin, L. G., Wang, A., Rydén, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-4789-4
_version_ 1783417034229415936
author Mellbin, L. G.
Wang, A.
Rydén, L.
author_facet Mellbin, L. G.
Wang, A.
Rydén, L.
author_sort Mellbin, L. G.
collection PubMed
description Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main reason for premature death in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hyperglycemia, the hallmark of diabetes, has long been considered the link between diabetes and CVD, and many trials focused on preventing CVD manifestations by means of tight glucose control. However, diabetes is a multifactorial disease in which, e. g., insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, and factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia contribute. Thus, treatment needs to be multifactorial and take cardiovascular aspects into account. Newer classes of drugs, originally launched for glucose lowering, among them dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, sodium–glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists, have been studied in large cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT). Several SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists are associated with a reduction of cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke). Although the mechanisms behind the effects are not fully understood, an important reason for the benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors seems be a reduction in heart failure, while GLP-1 receptor agonists may retard the development of the atherosclerotic vascular disease or may be effective by stabilizing plaques. The outcomes of these studies have been taken into account in recently issued guidelines and an important task for diabetologists, cardiologists, and general practitioners is to incorporate the findings of these trials into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6507479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65074792019-05-28 Clinical implications of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes Mellbin, L. G. Wang, A. Rydén, L. Herz Main Topic Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main reason for premature death in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hyperglycemia, the hallmark of diabetes, has long been considered the link between diabetes and CVD, and many trials focused on preventing CVD manifestations by means of tight glucose control. However, diabetes is a multifactorial disease in which, e. g., insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, and factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia contribute. Thus, treatment needs to be multifactorial and take cardiovascular aspects into account. Newer classes of drugs, originally launched for glucose lowering, among them dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, sodium–glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists, have been studied in large cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT). Several SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists are associated with a reduction of cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke). Although the mechanisms behind the effects are not fully understood, an important reason for the benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors seems be a reduction in heart failure, while GLP-1 receptor agonists may retard the development of the atherosclerotic vascular disease or may be effective by stabilizing plaques. The outcomes of these studies have been taken into account in recently issued guidelines and an important task for diabetologists, cardiologists, and general practitioners is to incorporate the findings of these trials into clinical practice. Springer Medizin 2019-02-25 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6507479/ /pubmed/30805659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-4789-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Main Topic
Mellbin, L. G.
Wang, A.
Rydén, L.
Clinical implications of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes
title Clinical implications of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes
title_full Clinical implications of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Clinical implications of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Clinical implications of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes
title_short Clinical implications of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes
title_sort clinical implications of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes
topic Main Topic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-4789-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mellbinlg clinicalimplicationsofcardiovascularoutcometrialsintype2diabetes
AT wanga clinicalimplicationsofcardiovascularoutcometrialsintype2diabetes
AT rydenl clinicalimplicationsofcardiovascularoutcometrialsintype2diabetes