Cargando…
Requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis
INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic error is a major threat to patient safety in the context of family practice. The patient safety implications are severe for both patient and clinician. Traditional approaches to diagnostic decision support have lacked broad acceptance for a number of well‐documented reasons:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10026 |
_version_ | 1783417086359371776 |
---|---|
author | Corrigan, Derek Munnelly, Gary Kazienko, Przemysław Kajdanowicz, Tomasz Soler, Jean‐Karl Mahmoud, Samhar Porat, Talya Kostopoulou, Olga Curcin, Vasa Delaney, Brendan |
author_facet | Corrigan, Derek Munnelly, Gary Kazienko, Przemysław Kajdanowicz, Tomasz Soler, Jean‐Karl Mahmoud, Samhar Porat, Talya Kostopoulou, Olga Curcin, Vasa Delaney, Brendan |
author_sort | Corrigan, Derek |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic error is a major threat to patient safety in the context of family practice. The patient safety implications are severe for both patient and clinician. Traditional approaches to diagnostic decision support have lacked broad acceptance for a number of well‐documented reasons: poor integration with electronic health records and clinician workflow, static evidence that lacks transparency and trust, and use of proprietary technical standards hindering wider interoperability. The learning health system (LHS) provides a suitable infrastructure for development of a new breed of learning decision support tools. These tools exploit the potential for appropriate use of the growing volumes of aggregated sources of electronic health records. METHODS: We describe the experiences of the TRANSFoRm project developing a diagnostic decision support infrastructure consistent with the wider goals of the LHS. We describe an architecture that is model driven, service oriented, constructed using open standards, and supports evidence derived from electronic sources of patient data. We describe the architecture and implementation of 2 critical aspects for a successful LHS: the model representation and translation of clinical evidence into effective practice and the generation of curated clinical evidence that can be used to populate those models, thus closing the LHS loop. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Six core design requirements for implementing a diagnostic LHS are identified and successfully implemented as part of this research work. A number of significant technical and policy challenges are identified for the LHS community to consider, and these are discussed in the context of evaluating this work: medico‐legal responsibility for generated diagnostic evidence, developing trust in the LHS (particularly important from the perspective of decision support), and constraints imposed by clinical terminologies on evidence generation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6508515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65085152019-06-26 Requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis Corrigan, Derek Munnelly, Gary Kazienko, Przemysław Kajdanowicz, Tomasz Soler, Jean‐Karl Mahmoud, Samhar Porat, Talya Kostopoulou, Olga Curcin, Vasa Delaney, Brendan Learn Health Syst Technical Report INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic error is a major threat to patient safety in the context of family practice. The patient safety implications are severe for both patient and clinician. Traditional approaches to diagnostic decision support have lacked broad acceptance for a number of well‐documented reasons: poor integration with electronic health records and clinician workflow, static evidence that lacks transparency and trust, and use of proprietary technical standards hindering wider interoperability. The learning health system (LHS) provides a suitable infrastructure for development of a new breed of learning decision support tools. These tools exploit the potential for appropriate use of the growing volumes of aggregated sources of electronic health records. METHODS: We describe the experiences of the TRANSFoRm project developing a diagnostic decision support infrastructure consistent with the wider goals of the LHS. We describe an architecture that is model driven, service oriented, constructed using open standards, and supports evidence derived from electronic sources of patient data. We describe the architecture and implementation of 2 critical aspects for a successful LHS: the model representation and translation of clinical evidence into effective practice and the generation of curated clinical evidence that can be used to populate those models, thus closing the LHS loop. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Six core design requirements for implementing a diagnostic LHS are identified and successfully implemented as part of this research work. A number of significant technical and policy challenges are identified for the LHS community to consider, and these are discussed in the context of evaluating this work: medico‐legal responsibility for generated diagnostic evidence, developing trust in the LHS (particularly important from the perspective of decision support), and constraints imposed by clinical terminologies on evidence generation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6508515/ /pubmed/31245568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10026 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the University of Michigan This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Technical Report Corrigan, Derek Munnelly, Gary Kazienko, Przemysław Kajdanowicz, Tomasz Soler, Jean‐Karl Mahmoud, Samhar Porat, Talya Kostopoulou, Olga Curcin, Vasa Delaney, Brendan Requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis |
title | Requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis |
title_full | Requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis |
title_short | Requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis |
title_sort | requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis |
topic | Technical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corriganderek requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis AT munnellygary requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis AT kazienkoprzemysław requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis AT kajdanowicztomasz requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis AT solerjeankarl requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis AT mahmoudsamhar requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis AT porattalya requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis AT kostopoulouolga requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis AT curcinvasa requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis AT delaneybrendan requirementsandvalidationofaprototypelearninghealthsystemforclinicaldiagnosis |