Cargando…

Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize‐GAMER)

We created a new high‐coverage, robust, and reproducible functional annotation of maize protein‐coding genes based on Gene Ontology (GO) term assignments. Whereas the existing Phytozome and Gramene maize GO annotation sets only cover 41% and 56% of maize protein‐coding genes, respectively, this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wimalanathan, Kokulapalan, Friedberg, Iddo, Andorf, Carson M., Lawrence‐Dill, Carolyn J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.52
_version_ 1783417088288751616
author Wimalanathan, Kokulapalan
Friedberg, Iddo
Andorf, Carson M.
Lawrence‐Dill, Carolyn J.
author_facet Wimalanathan, Kokulapalan
Friedberg, Iddo
Andorf, Carson M.
Lawrence‐Dill, Carolyn J.
author_sort Wimalanathan, Kokulapalan
collection PubMed
description We created a new high‐coverage, robust, and reproducible functional annotation of maize protein‐coding genes based on Gene Ontology (GO) term assignments. Whereas the existing Phytozome and Gramene maize GO annotation sets only cover 41% and 56% of maize protein‐coding genes, respectively, this study provides annotations for 100% of the genes. We also compared the quality of our newly derived annotations with the existing Gramene and Phytozome functional annotation sets by comparing all three to a manually annotated gold standard set of 1,619 genes where annotations were primarily inferred from direct assay or mutant phenotype. Evaluations based on the gold standard indicate that our new annotation set is measurably more accurate than those from Phytozome and Gramene. To derive this new high‐coverage, high‐confidence annotation set, we used sequence similarity and protein domain presence methods as well as mixed‐method pipelines that were developed for the Critical Assessment of Function Annotation (CAFA) challenge. Our project to improve maize annotations is called maize‐GAMER (GO Annotation Method, Evaluation, and Review), and the newly derived annotations are accessible via MaizeGDB (http://download.maizegdb.org/maize-GAMER) and CyVerse (B73 RefGen_v3 5b+ at doi.org/10.7946/P2S62P and B73 RefGen_v4 Zm00001d.2 at doi.org/10.7946/P2M925).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6508527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65085272019-06-26 Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize‐GAMER) Wimalanathan, Kokulapalan Friedberg, Iddo Andorf, Carson M. Lawrence‐Dill, Carolyn J. Plant Direct Original Research We created a new high‐coverage, robust, and reproducible functional annotation of maize protein‐coding genes based on Gene Ontology (GO) term assignments. Whereas the existing Phytozome and Gramene maize GO annotation sets only cover 41% and 56% of maize protein‐coding genes, respectively, this study provides annotations for 100% of the genes. We also compared the quality of our newly derived annotations with the existing Gramene and Phytozome functional annotation sets by comparing all three to a manually annotated gold standard set of 1,619 genes where annotations were primarily inferred from direct assay or mutant phenotype. Evaluations based on the gold standard indicate that our new annotation set is measurably more accurate than those from Phytozome and Gramene. To derive this new high‐coverage, high‐confidence annotation set, we used sequence similarity and protein domain presence methods as well as mixed‐method pipelines that were developed for the Critical Assessment of Function Annotation (CAFA) challenge. Our project to improve maize annotations is called maize‐GAMER (GO Annotation Method, Evaluation, and Review), and the newly derived annotations are accessible via MaizeGDB (http://download.maizegdb.org/maize-GAMER) and CyVerse (B73 RefGen_v3 5b+ at doi.org/10.7946/P2S62P and B73 RefGen_v4 Zm00001d.2 at doi.org/10.7946/P2M925). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6508527/ /pubmed/31245718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.52 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Plant Direct published by American Society of Plant Biologists, Society for Experimental Biology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wimalanathan, Kokulapalan
Friedberg, Iddo
Andorf, Carson M.
Lawrence‐Dill, Carolyn J.
Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize‐GAMER)
title Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize‐GAMER)
title_full Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize‐GAMER)
title_fullStr Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize‐GAMER)
title_full_unstemmed Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize‐GAMER)
title_short Maize GO Annotation—Methods, Evaluation, and Review (maize‐GAMER)
title_sort maize go annotation—methods, evaluation, and review (maize‐gamer)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.52
work_keys_str_mv AT wimalanathankokulapalan maizegoannotationmethodsevaluationandreviewmaizegamer
AT friedbergiddo maizegoannotationmethodsevaluationandreviewmaizegamer
AT andorfcarsonm maizegoannotationmethodsevaluationandreviewmaizegamer
AT lawrencedillcarolynj maizegoannotationmethodsevaluationandreviewmaizegamer