Cargando…

Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Conditions

BACKGROUND: Quantitative biomechanical characterization of pelvic supportive structures and functions in vivo is thought to provide insight into pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). An innovative approach—vaginal tactile imaging—allows biomechanical mapping of the female pelvic floor to q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egorov, Vladimir, Shobeiri, S. Abbas, Takacs, Peter, Hoyte, Lennox, Lucente, Vincent, van Raalte, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080695
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2018.810093
_version_ 1783417104747200512
author Egorov, Vladimir
Shobeiri, S. Abbas
Takacs, Peter
Hoyte, Lennox
Lucente, Vincent
van Raalte, Heather
author_facet Egorov, Vladimir
Shobeiri, S. Abbas
Takacs, Peter
Hoyte, Lennox
Lucente, Vincent
van Raalte, Heather
author_sort Egorov, Vladimir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantitative biomechanical characterization of pelvic supportive structures and functions in vivo is thought to provide insight into pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). An innovative approach—vaginal tactile imaging—allows biomechanical mapping of the female pelvic floor to quantify tissue elasticity, pelvic support, and pelvic muscle functions. The Vaginal Tactile Imager (VTI) records high definition pressure patterns from vaginal walls under an applied tissue deformation and during pelvic floor muscle contractions. OBJECTIVE: To explore an extended set of 52 biomechanical parameters for differentiation and characterization of POP relative to normal pelvic floor conditions. METHODS: 96 subjects with normal and POP conditions were included in the data analysis from multi-site observational, case-controlled studies; 42 subjects had normal pelvic floor conditions and 54 subjects had POP. The VTI, model 2S, was used with an analytical software package to calculate automatically 52 biomechanical parameters for 8 VTI test procedures (probe insertion, elevation, rotation, Valsalva maneuver, voluntary muscle contractions in 2 planes, relaxation, and reflex contraction). The groups were equalized for subject age and parity. RESULTS: The ranges, mean values, and standard deviations for all 52 VTI parameters were established. 33 of 52 parameters were identified as statistically sensitive (p < 0.05; t-test) to the POP development. Among these 33 parameters, 11 parameters show changes (decrease) in tissue elasticity, 8 parameters show deteriorations in pelvic support and 14 parameters show weakness in muscle functions for POP versus normal conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical mapping of the female pelvic floor with the VTI provides a unique set of parameters characterizing POP versus normal conditions. These objectively measurable biomechanical transformations of pelvic tissues, support structures, and functions under POP may be used in future research and practical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6508651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65086512019-05-09 Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Conditions Egorov, Vladimir Shobeiri, S. Abbas Takacs, Peter Hoyte, Lennox Lucente, Vincent van Raalte, Heather Open J Obstet Gynecol Article BACKGROUND: Quantitative biomechanical characterization of pelvic supportive structures and functions in vivo is thought to provide insight into pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). An innovative approach—vaginal tactile imaging—allows biomechanical mapping of the female pelvic floor to quantify tissue elasticity, pelvic support, and pelvic muscle functions. The Vaginal Tactile Imager (VTI) records high definition pressure patterns from vaginal walls under an applied tissue deformation and during pelvic floor muscle contractions. OBJECTIVE: To explore an extended set of 52 biomechanical parameters for differentiation and characterization of POP relative to normal pelvic floor conditions. METHODS: 96 subjects with normal and POP conditions were included in the data analysis from multi-site observational, case-controlled studies; 42 subjects had normal pelvic floor conditions and 54 subjects had POP. The VTI, model 2S, was used with an analytical software package to calculate automatically 52 biomechanical parameters for 8 VTI test procedures (probe insertion, elevation, rotation, Valsalva maneuver, voluntary muscle contractions in 2 planes, relaxation, and reflex contraction). The groups were equalized for subject age and parity. RESULTS: The ranges, mean values, and standard deviations for all 52 VTI parameters were established. 33 of 52 parameters were identified as statistically sensitive (p < 0.05; t-test) to the POP development. Among these 33 parameters, 11 parameters show changes (decrease) in tissue elasticity, 8 parameters show deteriorations in pelvic support and 14 parameters show weakness in muscle functions for POP versus normal conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical mapping of the female pelvic floor with the VTI provides a unique set of parameters characterizing POP versus normal conditions. These objectively measurable biomechanical transformations of pelvic tissues, support structures, and functions under POP may be used in future research and practical applications. 2018-08-31 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6508651/ /pubmed/31080695 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2018.810093 Text en This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Egorov, Vladimir
Shobeiri, S. Abbas
Takacs, Peter
Hoyte, Lennox
Lucente, Vincent
van Raalte, Heather
Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Conditions
title Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Conditions
title_full Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Conditions
title_fullStr Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Conditions
title_short Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Conditions
title_sort biomechanical mapping of the female pelvic floor: prolapse versus normal conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080695
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2018.810093
work_keys_str_mv AT egorovvladimir biomechanicalmappingofthefemalepelvicfloorprolapseversusnormalconditions
AT shobeirisabbas biomechanicalmappingofthefemalepelvicfloorprolapseversusnormalconditions
AT takacspeter biomechanicalmappingofthefemalepelvicfloorprolapseversusnormalconditions
AT hoytelennox biomechanicalmappingofthefemalepelvicfloorprolapseversusnormalconditions
AT lucentevincent biomechanicalmappingofthefemalepelvicfloorprolapseversusnormalconditions
AT vanraalteheather biomechanicalmappingofthefemalepelvicfloorprolapseversusnormalconditions