Cargando…
Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN
Engaging patients, clinicians, and community members in the development of a research network creates opportunities and challenges beyond engagement in discrete learning activities. This paper describes our experiences establishing and maintaining a stakeholder engagement infrastructure for the Chic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10079 |
_version_ | 1783417130367057920 |
---|---|
author | Tambor, Ellen Shalowitz, Madeleine Harrington, Joseph M. Hull, Kevin Watson, Natalie Sital, Shelly Al Naber, Jennifer Miller, Doriane |
author_facet | Tambor, Ellen Shalowitz, Madeleine Harrington, Joseph M. Hull, Kevin Watson, Natalie Sital, Shelly Al Naber, Jennifer Miller, Doriane |
author_sort | Tambor, Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Engaging patients, clinicians, and community members in the development of a research network creates opportunities and challenges beyond engagement in discrete learning activities. This paper describes our experiences establishing and maintaining a stakeholder engagement infrastructure for the Chicago Area Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Network (CAPriCORN) and highlights important lessons learned over the first 4 years. During this time, the CAPriCORN Patient and Community Advisory Committee (PCAC) appointed patient, clinician, and community representatives to governance and advisory groups throughout the network, developed a process and criteria for patient‐ and clinician‐centered review of research proposals, and evolved from a large, diverse group to a smaller yet still diverse, more actively engaged group with connections to the broader community. Key challenges faced by the PCAC have included determining the optimal size and composition of the group, understanding the complex structure of the network as a whole, coordinating with other network entities and functions, and integrating the patient and community voice into the research review process. Efforts to engage stakeholders in clinical data research networks should anticipate and develop solutions to address these challenges. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6508783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65087832019-06-26 Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN Tambor, Ellen Shalowitz, Madeleine Harrington, Joseph M. Hull, Kevin Watson, Natalie Sital, Shelly Al Naber, Jennifer Miller, Doriane Learn Health Syst Experience Report Engaging patients, clinicians, and community members in the development of a research network creates opportunities and challenges beyond engagement in discrete learning activities. This paper describes our experiences establishing and maintaining a stakeholder engagement infrastructure for the Chicago Area Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Network (CAPriCORN) and highlights important lessons learned over the first 4 years. During this time, the CAPriCORN Patient and Community Advisory Committee (PCAC) appointed patient, clinician, and community representatives to governance and advisory groups throughout the network, developed a process and criteria for patient‐ and clinician‐centered review of research proposals, and evolved from a large, diverse group to a smaller yet still diverse, more actively engaged group with connections to the broader community. Key challenges faced by the PCAC have included determining the optimal size and composition of the group, understanding the complex structure of the network as a whole, coordinating with other network entities and functions, and integrating the patient and community voice into the research review process. Efforts to engage stakeholders in clinical data research networks should anticipate and develop solutions to address these challenges. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6508783/ /pubmed/31245603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10079 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the University of Michigan This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Experience Report Tambor, Ellen Shalowitz, Madeleine Harrington, Joseph M. Hull, Kevin Watson, Natalie Sital, Shelly Al Naber, Jennifer Miller, Doriane Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN |
title | Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN |
title_full | Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN |
title_fullStr | Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN |
title_full_unstemmed | Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN |
title_short | Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN |
title_sort | engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a clinical data research network: lessons learned from the capricorn cdrn |
topic | Experience Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tamborellen engagingpatientscliniciansandthecommunityinaclinicaldataresearchnetworklessonslearnedfromthecapricorncdrn AT shalowitzmadeleine engagingpatientscliniciansandthecommunityinaclinicaldataresearchnetworklessonslearnedfromthecapricorncdrn AT harringtonjosephm engagingpatientscliniciansandthecommunityinaclinicaldataresearchnetworklessonslearnedfromthecapricorncdrn AT hullkevin engagingpatientscliniciansandthecommunityinaclinicaldataresearchnetworklessonslearnedfromthecapricorncdrn AT watsonnatalie engagingpatientscliniciansandthecommunityinaclinicaldataresearchnetworklessonslearnedfromthecapricorncdrn AT sitalshelly engagingpatientscliniciansandthecommunityinaclinicaldataresearchnetworklessonslearnedfromthecapricorncdrn AT alnaberjennifer engagingpatientscliniciansandthecommunityinaclinicaldataresearchnetworklessonslearnedfromthecapricorncdrn AT millerdoriane engagingpatientscliniciansandthecommunityinaclinicaldataresearchnetworklessonslearnedfromthecapricorncdrn |