Cargando…
Stakeholder perspectives regarding alternate approaches to informed consent for comparative effectiveness research
INTRODUCTION: Traditional informed consent approaches, involving separate discussions and lengthy consent forms, may be an imperfect fit for comparative effectiveness research (CER) that is integrated into usual care and compares non‐investigational treatments. However, systematic efforts to collect...
Autores principales: | Morain, Stephanie R., Tambor, Ellen, Moloney, Rachael, Kass, Nancy E., Tunis, Sean, Hallez, Kristina, Faden, Ruth R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10047 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Stakeholder perspectives regarding pragmatic clinical trial collateral findings
por: Morain, Stephanie R., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
One size does not fit all: Insights for engaging front‐line clinicians in pragmatic clinical trials
por: Tambor, Ellen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Post-consent assessment of dental subjects' understanding of informed consent in oral health research in Nigeria
por: Taiwo, Olaniyi O, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
A comprehensive systematic review of stakeholder attitudes to alternatives to prospective informed consent in paediatric acute care research
por: Furyk, Jeremy, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Informed Consent in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
por: Caspi, Opher, et al.
Publicado: (2011)