Cargando…

Transparency and choice in learning healthcare systems

Learning healthcare systems rely on potentially sensitive data and biospecimens from patients who typically have no knowledge of secondary uses of these resources for research. While this failure to inform patients of these practices is consistent with human subject regulations for research, these p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Botkin, Jeffrey R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10049
_version_ 1783417141987377152
author Botkin, Jeffrey R.
author_facet Botkin, Jeffrey R.
author_sort Botkin, Jeffrey R.
collection PubMed
description Learning healthcare systems rely on potentially sensitive data and biospecimens from patients who typically have no knowledge of secondary uses of these resources for research. While this failure to inform patients of these practices is consistent with human subject regulations for research, these practices risk controversy and a loss of trust in the integrity of healthcare institutions. This article reviews recent controversies in this domain and argues for new institutional practices that entail patient education about secondary uses of data and biospecimens and the opportunity for patient choice in the form of an opt‐out system. This approach would enhance transparency and reduce the risk of a loss of public trust in the research enterprise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6508837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65088372019-06-26 Transparency and choice in learning healthcare systems Botkin, Jeffrey R. Learn Health Syst Experience Reports Learning healthcare systems rely on potentially sensitive data and biospecimens from patients who typically have no knowledge of secondary uses of these resources for research. While this failure to inform patients of these practices is consistent with human subject regulations for research, these practices risk controversy and a loss of trust in the integrity of healthcare institutions. This article reviews recent controversies in this domain and argues for new institutional practices that entail patient education about secondary uses of data and biospecimens and the opportunity for patient choice in the form of an opt‐out system. This approach would enhance transparency and reduce the risk of a loss of public trust in the research enterprise. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6508837/ /pubmed/31245576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10049 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the University of Michigan This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Experience Reports
Botkin, Jeffrey R.
Transparency and choice in learning healthcare systems
title Transparency and choice in learning healthcare systems
title_full Transparency and choice in learning healthcare systems
title_fullStr Transparency and choice in learning healthcare systems
title_full_unstemmed Transparency and choice in learning healthcare systems
title_short Transparency and choice in learning healthcare systems
title_sort transparency and choice in learning healthcare systems
topic Experience Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6508837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10049
work_keys_str_mv AT botkinjeffreyr transparencyandchoiceinlearninghealthcaresystems