Cargando…

People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others

One can never know the internal workings of another person—one can only infer others' mental states based on external cues. In contrast, each person has direct access to the contents of their own mind. Here, we test the hypothesis that this privileged access shapes the way people represent inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thornton, Mark A., Weaverdyck, Miriam E., Mildner, Judith N., Tamir, Diana I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10083-6
_version_ 1783417179320877056
author Thornton, Mark A.
Weaverdyck, Miriam E.
Mildner, Judith N.
Tamir, Diana I.
author_facet Thornton, Mark A.
Weaverdyck, Miriam E.
Mildner, Judith N.
Tamir, Diana I.
author_sort Thornton, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description One can never know the internal workings of another person—one can only infer others' mental states based on external cues. In contrast, each person has direct access to the contents of their own mind. Here, we test the hypothesis that this privileged access shapes the way people represent internal mental experiences, such that they represent their own mental states more distinctly than the states of others. Across four studies, participants considered their own and others' mental states; analyses measured the distinctiveness of mental state representations. Two fMRI studies used representational similarity analyses to demonstrate that the social brain manifests more distinct activity patterns when thinking about one's own states vs. others'. Two behavioral studies complement these findings, and demonstrate that people differentiate between states less as social distance increases. Together, these results suggest that we represent our own mind with greater granularity than the minds of others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6509111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65091112019-05-13 People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others Thornton, Mark A. Weaverdyck, Miriam E. Mildner, Judith N. Tamir, Diana I. Nat Commun Article One can never know the internal workings of another person—one can only infer others' mental states based on external cues. In contrast, each person has direct access to the contents of their own mind. Here, we test the hypothesis that this privileged access shapes the way people represent internal mental experiences, such that they represent their own mental states more distinctly than the states of others. Across four studies, participants considered their own and others' mental states; analyses measured the distinctiveness of mental state representations. Two fMRI studies used representational similarity analyses to demonstrate that the social brain manifests more distinct activity patterns when thinking about one's own states vs. others'. Two behavioral studies complement these findings, and demonstrate that people differentiate between states less as social distance increases. Together, these results suggest that we represent our own mind with greater granularity than the minds of others. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6509111/ /pubmed/31073156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10083-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Thornton, Mark A.
Weaverdyck, Miriam E.
Mildner, Judith N.
Tamir, Diana I.
People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others
title People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others
title_full People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others
title_fullStr People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others
title_full_unstemmed People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others
title_short People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others
title_sort people represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10083-6
work_keys_str_mv AT thorntonmarka peoplerepresenttheirownmentalstatesmoredistinctlythanthoseofothers
AT weaverdyckmiriame peoplerepresenttheirownmentalstatesmoredistinctlythanthoseofothers
AT mildnerjudithn peoplerepresenttheirownmentalstatesmoredistinctlythanthoseofothers
AT tamirdianai peoplerepresenttheirownmentalstatesmoredistinctlythanthoseofothers