Cargando…
People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others
One can never know the internal workings of another person—one can only infer others' mental states based on external cues. In contrast, each person has direct access to the contents of their own mind. Here, we test the hypothesis that this privileged access shapes the way people represent inte...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10083-6 |
_version_ | 1783417179320877056 |
---|---|
author | Thornton, Mark A. Weaverdyck, Miriam E. Mildner, Judith N. Tamir, Diana I. |
author_facet | Thornton, Mark A. Weaverdyck, Miriam E. Mildner, Judith N. Tamir, Diana I. |
author_sort | Thornton, Mark A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | One can never know the internal workings of another person—one can only infer others' mental states based on external cues. In contrast, each person has direct access to the contents of their own mind. Here, we test the hypothesis that this privileged access shapes the way people represent internal mental experiences, such that they represent their own mental states more distinctly than the states of others. Across four studies, participants considered their own and others' mental states; analyses measured the distinctiveness of mental state representations. Two fMRI studies used representational similarity analyses to demonstrate that the social brain manifests more distinct activity patterns when thinking about one's own states vs. others'. Two behavioral studies complement these findings, and demonstrate that people differentiate between states less as social distance increases. Together, these results suggest that we represent our own mind with greater granularity than the minds of others. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6509111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65091112019-05-13 People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others Thornton, Mark A. Weaverdyck, Miriam E. Mildner, Judith N. Tamir, Diana I. Nat Commun Article One can never know the internal workings of another person—one can only infer others' mental states based on external cues. In contrast, each person has direct access to the contents of their own mind. Here, we test the hypothesis that this privileged access shapes the way people represent internal mental experiences, such that they represent their own mental states more distinctly than the states of others. Across four studies, participants considered their own and others' mental states; analyses measured the distinctiveness of mental state representations. Two fMRI studies used representational similarity analyses to demonstrate that the social brain manifests more distinct activity patterns when thinking about one's own states vs. others'. Two behavioral studies complement these findings, and demonstrate that people differentiate between states less as social distance increases. Together, these results suggest that we represent our own mind with greater granularity than the minds of others. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6509111/ /pubmed/31073156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10083-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Thornton, Mark A. Weaverdyck, Miriam E. Mildner, Judith N. Tamir, Diana I. People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others |
title | People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others |
title_full | People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others |
title_fullStr | People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others |
title_full_unstemmed | People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others |
title_short | People represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others |
title_sort | people represent their own mental states more distinctly than those of others |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31073156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10083-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thorntonmarka peoplerepresenttheirownmentalstatesmoredistinctlythanthoseofothers AT weaverdyckmiriame peoplerepresenttheirownmentalstatesmoredistinctlythanthoseofothers AT mildnerjudithn peoplerepresenttheirownmentalstatesmoredistinctlythanthoseofothers AT tamirdianai peoplerepresenttheirownmentalstatesmoredistinctlythanthoseofothers |