Cargando…

Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements

Recently, evidence has been accumulating that untreated hearing loss can lead to neurophysiological changes that affect speech processing abilities in noise. To shed more light on how aiding may impact these effects, this study explored the influence of hearing aid (HA) experience on the cognitive p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habicht, Julia, Behler, Oliver, Kollmeier, Birger, Neher, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31130836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00420
_version_ 1783417244502458368
author Habicht, Julia
Behler, Oliver
Kollmeier, Birger
Neher, Tobias
author_facet Habicht, Julia
Behler, Oliver
Kollmeier, Birger
Neher, Tobias
author_sort Habicht, Julia
collection PubMed
description Recently, evidence has been accumulating that untreated hearing loss can lead to neurophysiological changes that affect speech processing abilities in noise. To shed more light on how aiding may impact these effects, this study explored the influence of hearing aid (HA) experience on the cognitive processes underlying speech comprehension. Eye-tracking and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements were carried out with acoustic sentence-in-noise (SiN) stimuli complemented by pairs of pictures that either correctly (target picture) or incorrectly (competitor picture) depicted the sentence meanings. For the eye-tracking measurements, the time taken by the participants to start fixating the target picture (the ‘processing time’) was measured. For the fMRI measurements, brain activation inferred from blood-oxygen-level dependent responses following sentence comprehension was measured. A noise-only condition was also included. Groups of older hearing-impaired individuals matched in terms of age, hearing loss, and working memory capacity with (eHA; N = 13) or without (iHA; N = 14) HA experience participated. All acoustic stimuli were presented via earphones with individual linear amplification to ensure audibility. Consistent with previous findings, the iHA group had significantly longer (poorer) processing times than the eHA group, despite no differences in speech recognition performance. Concerning the fMRI measurements, there were indications of less brain activation in some right frontal areas for SiN relative to noise-only stimuli in the eHA group compared to the iHA group. Together, these results suggest that HA experience leads to faster speech-in-noise processing, possibly related to less recruitment of brain regions outside the core sentence-comprehension network. Follow-up research is needed to substantiate the findings related to changes in cortical speech processing with HA use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6509414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65094142019-05-24 Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements Habicht, Julia Behler, Oliver Kollmeier, Birger Neher, Tobias Front Neurosci Neuroscience Recently, evidence has been accumulating that untreated hearing loss can lead to neurophysiological changes that affect speech processing abilities in noise. To shed more light on how aiding may impact these effects, this study explored the influence of hearing aid (HA) experience on the cognitive processes underlying speech comprehension. Eye-tracking and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements were carried out with acoustic sentence-in-noise (SiN) stimuli complemented by pairs of pictures that either correctly (target picture) or incorrectly (competitor picture) depicted the sentence meanings. For the eye-tracking measurements, the time taken by the participants to start fixating the target picture (the ‘processing time’) was measured. For the fMRI measurements, brain activation inferred from blood-oxygen-level dependent responses following sentence comprehension was measured. A noise-only condition was also included. Groups of older hearing-impaired individuals matched in terms of age, hearing loss, and working memory capacity with (eHA; N = 13) or without (iHA; N = 14) HA experience participated. All acoustic stimuli were presented via earphones with individual linear amplification to ensure audibility. Consistent with previous findings, the iHA group had significantly longer (poorer) processing times than the eHA group, despite no differences in speech recognition performance. Concerning the fMRI measurements, there were indications of less brain activation in some right frontal areas for SiN relative to noise-only stimuli in the eHA group compared to the iHA group. Together, these results suggest that HA experience leads to faster speech-in-noise processing, possibly related to less recruitment of brain regions outside the core sentence-comprehension network. Follow-up research is needed to substantiate the findings related to changes in cortical speech processing with HA use. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6509414/ /pubmed/31130836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00420 Text en Copyright © 2019 Habicht, Behler, Kollmeier and Neher. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Habicht, Julia
Behler, Oliver
Kollmeier, Birger
Neher, Tobias
Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements
title Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements
title_full Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements
title_fullStr Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements
title_short Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements
title_sort exploring differences in speech processing among older hearing-impaired listeners with or without hearing aid experience: eye-tracking and fmri measurements
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31130836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00420
work_keys_str_mv AT habichtjulia exploringdifferencesinspeechprocessingamongolderhearingimpairedlistenerswithorwithouthearingaidexperienceeyetrackingandfmrimeasurements
AT behleroliver exploringdifferencesinspeechprocessingamongolderhearingimpairedlistenerswithorwithouthearingaidexperienceeyetrackingandfmrimeasurements
AT kollmeierbirger exploringdifferencesinspeechprocessingamongolderhearingimpairedlistenerswithorwithouthearingaidexperienceeyetrackingandfmrimeasurements
AT nehertobias exploringdifferencesinspeechprocessingamongolderhearingimpairedlistenerswithorwithouthearingaidexperienceeyetrackingandfmrimeasurements