Cargando…

‘Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?’ Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking

The percentage of live births attended by a skilled birth attendant (SBA) is a key global indicator and proxy for monitoring progress in maternal and newborn health. Yet, the discrepancy between rising SBA coverage and non-commensurate declines in maternal and neonatal mortality in many low-income a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radovich, Emma, Benova, Lenka, Penn-Kekana, Loveday, Wong, Kerry, Campbell, Oona Maeve Renee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001367
_version_ 1783417275144994816
author Radovich, Emma
Benova, Lenka
Penn-Kekana, Loveday
Wong, Kerry
Campbell, Oona Maeve Renee
author_facet Radovich, Emma
Benova, Lenka
Penn-Kekana, Loveday
Wong, Kerry
Campbell, Oona Maeve Renee
author_sort Radovich, Emma
collection PubMed
description The percentage of live births attended by a skilled birth attendant (SBA) is a key global indicator and proxy for monitoring progress in maternal and newborn health. Yet, the discrepancy between rising SBA coverage and non-commensurate declines in maternal and neonatal mortality in many low-income and middle-income countries has brought increasing attention to the challenge of what the indicator of SBA coverage actually measures, and whether the indicator can be improved. In response to the 2018 revised definition of SBA and the push for improved measurement of progress in maternal and newborn health, this paper examines the evidence on what women can tell us about who assisted them during childbirth and methodological issues in estimating SBA coverage via population-based surveys. We present analyses based on Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys conducted since 2015 for 23 countries. Our findings show SBA coverage can be reasonably estimated from population-based surveys in settings of high coverage, though women have difficulty reporting specific cadres. We propose improvements in how skilled cadres are classified and documented, how linkages can be made to facility-based data to examine the enabling environment and further ways data can be disaggregated to understand the complexity of delivery care. We also reflect on the limitations of what SBA coverage reveals about the quality and circumstances of childbirth care. While improvements to the indicator are possible, we call for the use of multiple indicators to inform local efforts to improve the health of women and newborns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6509598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65095982019-05-28 ‘Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?’ Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking Radovich, Emma Benova, Lenka Penn-Kekana, Loveday Wong, Kerry Campbell, Oona Maeve Renee BMJ Glob Health Analysis The percentage of live births attended by a skilled birth attendant (SBA) is a key global indicator and proxy for monitoring progress in maternal and newborn health. Yet, the discrepancy between rising SBA coverage and non-commensurate declines in maternal and neonatal mortality in many low-income and middle-income countries has brought increasing attention to the challenge of what the indicator of SBA coverage actually measures, and whether the indicator can be improved. In response to the 2018 revised definition of SBA and the push for improved measurement of progress in maternal and newborn health, this paper examines the evidence on what women can tell us about who assisted them during childbirth and methodological issues in estimating SBA coverage via population-based surveys. We present analyses based on Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys conducted since 2015 for 23 countries. Our findings show SBA coverage can be reasonably estimated from population-based surveys in settings of high coverage, though women have difficulty reporting specific cadres. We propose improvements in how skilled cadres are classified and documented, how linkages can be made to facility-based data to examine the enabling environment and further ways data can be disaggregated to understand the complexity of delivery care. We also reflect on the limitations of what SBA coverage reveals about the quality and circumstances of childbirth care. While improvements to the indicator are possible, we call for the use of multiple indicators to inform local efforts to improve the health of women and newborns. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6509598/ /pubmed/31139455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001367 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Analysis
Radovich, Emma
Benova, Lenka
Penn-Kekana, Loveday
Wong, Kerry
Campbell, Oona Maeve Renee
‘Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?’ Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking
title ‘Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?’ Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking
title_full ‘Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?’ Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking
title_fullStr ‘Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?’ Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking
title_full_unstemmed ‘Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?’ Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking
title_short ‘Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?’ Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking
title_sort ‘who assisted with the delivery of (name)?’ issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking
topic Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001367
work_keys_str_mv AT radovichemma whoassistedwiththedeliveryofnameissuesinestimatingskilledbirthattendantcoveragethroughpopulationbasedsurveysandimplicationsforimprovingglobaltracking
AT benovalenka whoassistedwiththedeliveryofnameissuesinestimatingskilledbirthattendantcoveragethroughpopulationbasedsurveysandimplicationsforimprovingglobaltracking
AT pennkekanaloveday whoassistedwiththedeliveryofnameissuesinestimatingskilledbirthattendantcoveragethroughpopulationbasedsurveysandimplicationsforimprovingglobaltracking
AT wongkerry whoassistedwiththedeliveryofnameissuesinestimatingskilledbirthattendantcoveragethroughpopulationbasedsurveysandimplicationsforimprovingglobaltracking
AT campbelloonamaeverenee whoassistedwiththedeliveryofnameissuesinestimatingskilledbirthattendantcoveragethroughpopulationbasedsurveysandimplicationsforimprovingglobaltracking