Cargando…

Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND: The small incisions of minimally invasive surgery have the proposed benefit of less surgical trauma, less pain, and faster recovery. This study was done to compare minimally invasive techniques for aortic valve replacement, including right anterior mini-thoracotomy and mini-sternotomy, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olds, Anna, Saadat, Siavash, Azzolini, Anthony, Dombrovskiy, Viktor, Odroniec, Karen, Lemaire, Anthony, Ghaly, Aziz, Lee, Leonard Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0912-0
_version_ 1783417308760244224
author Olds, Anna
Saadat, Siavash
Azzolini, Anthony
Dombrovskiy, Viktor
Odroniec, Karen
Lemaire, Anthony
Ghaly, Aziz
Lee, Leonard Y.
author_facet Olds, Anna
Saadat, Siavash
Azzolini, Anthony
Dombrovskiy, Viktor
Odroniec, Karen
Lemaire, Anthony
Ghaly, Aziz
Lee, Leonard Y.
author_sort Olds, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The small incisions of minimally invasive surgery have the proposed benefit of less surgical trauma, less pain, and faster recovery. This study was done to compare minimally invasive techniques for aortic valve replacement, including right anterior mini-thoracotomy and mini-sternotomy, to conventional sternotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 503 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement at our institution from 2012 to 2015 using one of three techniques: 1) Mini-thoracotomy, 2) Mini-sternotomy, 3) Conventional sternotomy. Demographics, operative morbidity, mortality, and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: Of the 503 cases, 267 (53.1%) were mini-thoracotomy, 120 (23.8%) were mini-sternotomy, and 116 (23.1%) were conventional sternotomy. Mini-thoracotomy patients, compared to mini-sternotomy and conventional sternotomy, had significantly shorter bypass times [82 (IQ 67–113) minutes; vs. 117 (93.5–139.5); vs. 102.5 (85.5–132.5), respectively (p < 0.0001)], a lower incidence of prolonged ventilator support [3.75% vs. 9.17 and 12.9%, respectively (p = 0.0034)], and required significantly shorter ICU and postoperative stays, resulting in an overall shorter hospitalization [6 (IQ 5–9) days; vs. 7 (5–14.5); vs 9 (6–15.5), respectively (p < 0.05)]. Incidence of other postoperative complications were lower in the mini-thoracotomy group compared to mini-sternotomy and conventional sternotomy, without significance. Minimally invasive techniques trended towards better survival [mini-thoracotomy 1.5%, mini-sternotomy 1.67%, and conventional sternotomy 5.17% (p = 0.13)]. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement approaches are safe, effective alternatives to conventional sternotomy. The mini-thoracotomy approach showed decreased operative times, decreased lengths of stay, decreased incidence of prolonged ventilator time, and a trend towards lower mortality when compared to mini-sternotomy and conventional sternotomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6509756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65097562019-06-05 Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement Olds, Anna Saadat, Siavash Azzolini, Anthony Dombrovskiy, Viktor Odroniec, Karen Lemaire, Anthony Ghaly, Aziz Lee, Leonard Y. J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The small incisions of minimally invasive surgery have the proposed benefit of less surgical trauma, less pain, and faster recovery. This study was done to compare minimally invasive techniques for aortic valve replacement, including right anterior mini-thoracotomy and mini-sternotomy, to conventional sternotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 503 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement at our institution from 2012 to 2015 using one of three techniques: 1) Mini-thoracotomy, 2) Mini-sternotomy, 3) Conventional sternotomy. Demographics, operative morbidity, mortality, and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: Of the 503 cases, 267 (53.1%) were mini-thoracotomy, 120 (23.8%) were mini-sternotomy, and 116 (23.1%) were conventional sternotomy. Mini-thoracotomy patients, compared to mini-sternotomy and conventional sternotomy, had significantly shorter bypass times [82 (IQ 67–113) minutes; vs. 117 (93.5–139.5); vs. 102.5 (85.5–132.5), respectively (p < 0.0001)], a lower incidence of prolonged ventilator support [3.75% vs. 9.17 and 12.9%, respectively (p = 0.0034)], and required significantly shorter ICU and postoperative stays, resulting in an overall shorter hospitalization [6 (IQ 5–9) days; vs. 7 (5–14.5); vs 9 (6–15.5), respectively (p < 0.05)]. Incidence of other postoperative complications were lower in the mini-thoracotomy group compared to mini-sternotomy and conventional sternotomy, without significance. Minimally invasive techniques trended towards better survival [mini-thoracotomy 1.5%, mini-sternotomy 1.67%, and conventional sternotomy 5.17% (p = 0.13)]. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement approaches are safe, effective alternatives to conventional sternotomy. The mini-thoracotomy approach showed decreased operative times, decreased lengths of stay, decreased incidence of prolonged ventilator time, and a trend towards lower mortality when compared to mini-sternotomy and conventional sternotomy. BioMed Central 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6509756/ /pubmed/31072356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0912-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olds, Anna
Saadat, Siavash
Azzolini, Anthony
Dombrovskiy, Viktor
Odroniec, Karen
Lemaire, Anthony
Ghaly, Aziz
Lee, Leonard Y.
Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement
title Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement
title_full Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement
title_fullStr Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement
title_short Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement
title_sort improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0912-0
work_keys_str_mv AT oldsanna improvedoperativeandrecoverytimeswithminithoracotomyaorticvalvereplacement
AT saadatsiavash improvedoperativeandrecoverytimeswithminithoracotomyaorticvalvereplacement
AT azzolinianthony improvedoperativeandrecoverytimeswithminithoracotomyaorticvalvereplacement
AT dombrovskiyviktor improvedoperativeandrecoverytimeswithminithoracotomyaorticvalvereplacement
AT odronieckaren improvedoperativeandrecoverytimeswithminithoracotomyaorticvalvereplacement
AT lemaireanthony improvedoperativeandrecoverytimeswithminithoracotomyaorticvalvereplacement
AT ghalyaziz improvedoperativeandrecoverytimeswithminithoracotomyaorticvalvereplacement
AT leeleonardy improvedoperativeandrecoverytimeswithminithoracotomyaorticvalvereplacement