Cargando…
Psychosocial working conditions, asthma self-management at work and asthma morbidity: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Adverse psychosocial working conditions—in particular poor job decision latitude and poor social support at work—may impair the effective implementation of asthma self-management behaviour at work and may be associated with increased asthma morbidity. In this study, we investigate for th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-019-0264-9 |
_version_ | 1783417312563429376 |
---|---|
author | Heinrichs, Katherina Hummel, Stefan Gholami, Jalal Schultz, Konrad Li, Jian Sheikh, Aziz Loerbroks, Adrian |
author_facet | Heinrichs, Katherina Hummel, Stefan Gholami, Jalal Schultz, Konrad Li, Jian Sheikh, Aziz Loerbroks, Adrian |
author_sort | Heinrichs, Katherina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adverse psychosocial working conditions—in particular poor job decision latitude and poor social support at work—may impair the effective implementation of asthma self-management behaviour at work and may be associated with increased asthma morbidity. In this study, we investigate for the first time the association of job decision latitude and social support at work with (1) four asthma-specific self-management behaviours at work (i.e., physical activity, trigger avoidance, acute symptom management, and communication) and with (2) asthma morbidity. METHODS: A total of 221 employees with asthma recruited through three rehabilitation clinics completed questionnaires (response rate = 29.3%). Job decision latitude and social support were measured using items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. The four asthma self-management behaviours were mainly assessed by self-developed items. We used the Asthma Control Test and the Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire to measure asthma morbidity. We dichotomized all variables and conducted logistic regression analyses to calculate odds ratios with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Low job decision latitude and low social support were significantly associated with poorer trigger avoidance (odds ratios ≥ 2.09) and poorer acute symptom management (odds ratios ≥ 2.29); low social support was further related to significantly less communication (odds ratio = 2.82). Low job decision latitude and low social support were also associated with significantly poorer asthma control (odds ratios ≥ 1.95) and poorer asthma-specific quality of life (odds ratios ≥ 2.05). The relationships with asthma morbidity were attenuated after adjustment for the four asthma self-management behaviours (odds ratios ranging from 1.1 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse psychosocial working conditions are associated with poorer asthma self-management behaviour at work and with increased asthma morbidity. The latter association may be mediated by asthma self-management behaviour. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, registration number: DRK S00011309, date of registration: 22.12.2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13601-019-0264-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6509772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65097722019-06-05 Psychosocial working conditions, asthma self-management at work and asthma morbidity: a cross-sectional study Heinrichs, Katherina Hummel, Stefan Gholami, Jalal Schultz, Konrad Li, Jian Sheikh, Aziz Loerbroks, Adrian Clin Transl Allergy Research BACKGROUND: Adverse psychosocial working conditions—in particular poor job decision latitude and poor social support at work—may impair the effective implementation of asthma self-management behaviour at work and may be associated with increased asthma morbidity. In this study, we investigate for the first time the association of job decision latitude and social support at work with (1) four asthma-specific self-management behaviours at work (i.e., physical activity, trigger avoidance, acute symptom management, and communication) and with (2) asthma morbidity. METHODS: A total of 221 employees with asthma recruited through three rehabilitation clinics completed questionnaires (response rate = 29.3%). Job decision latitude and social support were measured using items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. The four asthma self-management behaviours were mainly assessed by self-developed items. We used the Asthma Control Test and the Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire to measure asthma morbidity. We dichotomized all variables and conducted logistic regression analyses to calculate odds ratios with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Low job decision latitude and low social support were significantly associated with poorer trigger avoidance (odds ratios ≥ 2.09) and poorer acute symptom management (odds ratios ≥ 2.29); low social support was further related to significantly less communication (odds ratio = 2.82). Low job decision latitude and low social support were also associated with significantly poorer asthma control (odds ratios ≥ 1.95) and poorer asthma-specific quality of life (odds ratios ≥ 2.05). The relationships with asthma morbidity were attenuated after adjustment for the four asthma self-management behaviours (odds ratios ranging from 1.1 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse psychosocial working conditions are associated with poorer asthma self-management behaviour at work and with increased asthma morbidity. The latter association may be mediated by asthma self-management behaviour. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, registration number: DRK S00011309, date of registration: 22.12.2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13601-019-0264-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6509772/ /pubmed/31168356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-019-0264-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Heinrichs, Katherina Hummel, Stefan Gholami, Jalal Schultz, Konrad Li, Jian Sheikh, Aziz Loerbroks, Adrian Psychosocial working conditions, asthma self-management at work and asthma morbidity: a cross-sectional study |
title | Psychosocial working conditions, asthma self-management at work and asthma morbidity: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Psychosocial working conditions, asthma self-management at work and asthma morbidity: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Psychosocial working conditions, asthma self-management at work and asthma morbidity: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychosocial working conditions, asthma self-management at work and asthma morbidity: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Psychosocial working conditions, asthma self-management at work and asthma morbidity: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | psychosocial working conditions, asthma self-management at work and asthma morbidity: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-019-0264-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heinrichskatherina psychosocialworkingconditionsasthmaselfmanagementatworkandasthmamorbidityacrosssectionalstudy AT hummelstefan psychosocialworkingconditionsasthmaselfmanagementatworkandasthmamorbidityacrosssectionalstudy AT gholamijalal psychosocialworkingconditionsasthmaselfmanagementatworkandasthmamorbidityacrosssectionalstudy AT schultzkonrad psychosocialworkingconditionsasthmaselfmanagementatworkandasthmamorbidityacrosssectionalstudy AT lijian psychosocialworkingconditionsasthmaselfmanagementatworkandasthmamorbidityacrosssectionalstudy AT sheikhaziz psychosocialworkingconditionsasthmaselfmanagementatworkandasthmamorbidityacrosssectionalstudy AT loerbroksadrian psychosocialworkingconditionsasthmaselfmanagementatworkandasthmamorbidityacrosssectionalstudy |