Cargando…

Comparative transcriptome analysis of trout skin pigment cells

BACKGROUND: Enormous variability in skin colour and patterning is a characteristic of teleost fish, including Salmonidae fishes, which present themselves as a suitable model for studying mechanisms of pigment patterning. In order to screen for candidate genes potentially involved in the specific ski...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Djurdjevič, Ida, Furmanek, Tomasz, Miyazawa, Seita, Sušnik Bajec, Simona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5714-1
_version_ 1783417330646122496
author Djurdjevič, Ida
Furmanek, Tomasz
Miyazawa, Seita
Sušnik Bajec, Simona
author_facet Djurdjevič, Ida
Furmanek, Tomasz
Miyazawa, Seita
Sušnik Bajec, Simona
author_sort Djurdjevič, Ida
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enormous variability in skin colour and patterning is a characteristic of teleost fish, including Salmonidae fishes, which present themselves as a suitable model for studying mechanisms of pigment patterning. In order to screen for candidate genes potentially involved in the specific skin pigment pattern in marble trout (labyrinthine skin pattern) and brown trout (spotted skin pattern), we conducted comparative transcriptome analysis between differently pigmented dermis sections of the adult skin of the two species. RESULTS: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) possibly associated with skin pigment pattern were identified. The expression profile of 27 DEGs was further tested with quantitative real-time PCR on a larger number of samples. Expression of a subset of ten of these genes was analysed in hybrid (marble x brown) trout individuals and compared with the complexity of their skin pigment pattern. A correlation between the phenotype and the expression profile assessed for hybrid individuals was detected for four (gja5, clcn2, cdkn1a and tjp1) of the ten candidate genes tested. The potential role of these genes in skin pigment pattern maintenance is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the maintenance of different pigment patterns in trout is dependent upon specific communication—involving gap junctions, tight junctions and ion channels—between chromatophores present in differentially pigmented skin regions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5714-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6509846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65098462019-06-05 Comparative transcriptome analysis of trout skin pigment cells Djurdjevič, Ida Furmanek, Tomasz Miyazawa, Seita Sušnik Bajec, Simona BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Enormous variability in skin colour and patterning is a characteristic of teleost fish, including Salmonidae fishes, which present themselves as a suitable model for studying mechanisms of pigment patterning. In order to screen for candidate genes potentially involved in the specific skin pigment pattern in marble trout (labyrinthine skin pattern) and brown trout (spotted skin pattern), we conducted comparative transcriptome analysis between differently pigmented dermis sections of the adult skin of the two species. RESULTS: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) possibly associated with skin pigment pattern were identified. The expression profile of 27 DEGs was further tested with quantitative real-time PCR on a larger number of samples. Expression of a subset of ten of these genes was analysed in hybrid (marble x brown) trout individuals and compared with the complexity of their skin pigment pattern. A correlation between the phenotype and the expression profile assessed for hybrid individuals was detected for four (gja5, clcn2, cdkn1a and tjp1) of the ten candidate genes tested. The potential role of these genes in skin pigment pattern maintenance is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the maintenance of different pigment patterns in trout is dependent upon specific communication—involving gap junctions, tight junctions and ion channels—between chromatophores present in differentially pigmented skin regions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5714-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6509846/ /pubmed/31072301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5714-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Djurdjevič, Ida
Furmanek, Tomasz
Miyazawa, Seita
Sušnik Bajec, Simona
Comparative transcriptome analysis of trout skin pigment cells
title Comparative transcriptome analysis of trout skin pigment cells
title_full Comparative transcriptome analysis of trout skin pigment cells
title_fullStr Comparative transcriptome analysis of trout skin pigment cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparative transcriptome analysis of trout skin pigment cells
title_short Comparative transcriptome analysis of trout skin pigment cells
title_sort comparative transcriptome analysis of trout skin pigment cells
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31072301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5714-1
work_keys_str_mv AT djurdjevicida comparativetranscriptomeanalysisoftroutskinpigmentcells
AT furmanektomasz comparativetranscriptomeanalysisoftroutskinpigmentcells
AT miyazawaseita comparativetranscriptomeanalysisoftroutskinpigmentcells
AT susnikbajecsimona comparativetranscriptomeanalysisoftroutskinpigmentcells