Cargando…
Comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system
Innovative solutions are necessary to enable the decentralized recycling of greywater for applications requiring high-quality water, such as hand washing. While physical barriers such as ultrafiltration membranes effectively prevent the passage of bacteria, and chemical and biological treatments can...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31119215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2018.100020 |
_version_ | 1783417404694462464 |
---|---|
author | Ziemba, Christopher Larivé, Odile Deck, Svenja Huisman, Theo Morgenroth, Eberhard |
author_facet | Ziemba, Christopher Larivé, Odile Deck, Svenja Huisman, Theo Morgenroth, Eberhard |
author_sort | Ziemba, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | Innovative solutions are necessary to enable the decentralized recycling of greywater for applications requiring high-quality water, such as hand washing. While physical barriers such as ultrafiltration membranes effectively prevent the passage of bacteria, and chemical and biological treatments can effectively reduce the carbon content of the treated water, there exists a knowledge gap regarding the application of anti-bacterial strategies to prevent the growth of harmful bacteria following treatment. In this study, the effluent water from a household-scale greywater treatment system was fed to seven parallel experimental post-treatment tanks: three receiving direct chlorination with free chlorine residuals of 0.2, 1 or 5 mg Cl(2)/L, three with chlorine produced through electrolysis at the same residual concentrations, and one control with no chlorine added. For increasing concentrations of direct chlorination, the median total cell count (TCC) values were 9 × 10(4), 2.9 × 10(4) and 1.8 × 10(3) cells/mL, respectively. Electrolysis treatment produced very similar TCC concentrations, 8.8 × 10(4), 1.1 × 10(4) and 2.3 × 10(3) cells/mL. The TCC concentrations were lower than the concentration of the water entering each tank (∼3 × 10(5) cells/mL). Intact cell count (ICC) measurements indicated that the viable cell concentrations, were less than 10% of the TCC values. Though electrolysis treatment can produce powerful oxidants, such as hydroxyl radical, there was no evidence that electrolysis in this system provided additional benefits beyond chlorine production for control of total or intact cell counts. Oxidation of bacteria by chlorine was the dominant anti-bacterial mechanism in our system. Monitoring of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and assimilable organic carbon (AOC) did not suggest that carbon-limitation significantly impacted cell counts when chlorination or electrolysis treatment was applied. This work demonstrates that either direct chlorination or electrolysis treatment are able to reduce bacteria concentrations over long-term operation of a hand washing water treatment system. We recommend selecting chlorine residual targets such that a chlorine residual is maintained during periods of challenging operating conditions. We observed that a target residual of 1 mg Cl(2)/L, in our system, maintained the TCC below the concentration found in Zürich drinking water. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6510329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65103292019-05-20 Comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system Ziemba, Christopher Larivé, Odile Deck, Svenja Huisman, Theo Morgenroth, Eberhard Water Res X Full Paper Innovative solutions are necessary to enable the decentralized recycling of greywater for applications requiring high-quality water, such as hand washing. While physical barriers such as ultrafiltration membranes effectively prevent the passage of bacteria, and chemical and biological treatments can effectively reduce the carbon content of the treated water, there exists a knowledge gap regarding the application of anti-bacterial strategies to prevent the growth of harmful bacteria following treatment. In this study, the effluent water from a household-scale greywater treatment system was fed to seven parallel experimental post-treatment tanks: three receiving direct chlorination with free chlorine residuals of 0.2, 1 or 5 mg Cl(2)/L, three with chlorine produced through electrolysis at the same residual concentrations, and one control with no chlorine added. For increasing concentrations of direct chlorination, the median total cell count (TCC) values were 9 × 10(4), 2.9 × 10(4) and 1.8 × 10(3) cells/mL, respectively. Electrolysis treatment produced very similar TCC concentrations, 8.8 × 10(4), 1.1 × 10(4) and 2.3 × 10(3) cells/mL. The TCC concentrations were lower than the concentration of the water entering each tank (∼3 × 10(5) cells/mL). Intact cell count (ICC) measurements indicated that the viable cell concentrations, were less than 10% of the TCC values. Though electrolysis treatment can produce powerful oxidants, such as hydroxyl radical, there was no evidence that electrolysis in this system provided additional benefits beyond chlorine production for control of total or intact cell counts. Oxidation of bacteria by chlorine was the dominant anti-bacterial mechanism in our system. Monitoring of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and assimilable organic carbon (AOC) did not suggest that carbon-limitation significantly impacted cell counts when chlorination or electrolysis treatment was applied. This work demonstrates that either direct chlorination or electrolysis treatment are able to reduce bacteria concentrations over long-term operation of a hand washing water treatment system. We recommend selecting chlorine residual targets such that a chlorine residual is maintained during periods of challenging operating conditions. We observed that a target residual of 1 mg Cl(2)/L, in our system, maintained the TCC below the concentration found in Zürich drinking water. Elsevier 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6510329/ /pubmed/31119215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2018.100020 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Full Paper Ziemba, Christopher Larivé, Odile Deck, Svenja Huisman, Theo Morgenroth, Eberhard Comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system |
title | Comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system |
title_full | Comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system |
title_fullStr | Comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system |
title_short | Comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system |
title_sort | comparing the anti-bacterial performance of chlorination and electrolysis post-treatments in a hand washing water recycling system |
topic | Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31119215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2018.100020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ziembachristopher comparingtheantibacterialperformanceofchlorinationandelectrolysisposttreatmentsinahandwashingwaterrecyclingsystem AT lariveodile comparingtheantibacterialperformanceofchlorinationandelectrolysisposttreatmentsinahandwashingwaterrecyclingsystem AT decksvenja comparingtheantibacterialperformanceofchlorinationandelectrolysisposttreatmentsinahandwashingwaterrecyclingsystem AT huismantheo comparingtheantibacterialperformanceofchlorinationandelectrolysisposttreatmentsinahandwashingwaterrecyclingsystem AT morgenrotheberhard comparingtheantibacterialperformanceofchlorinationandelectrolysisposttreatmentsinahandwashingwaterrecyclingsystem |